Search results
Page title matches
- '''Opinion change is a [[feature]] of an [[campaign]]''' ...ges. If a certain proportion of the [[campaigner]]s call for a [[vote]] on opinion change such a vote will be arranged and as a result a "fierce" call for [[b571 bytes (98 words) - 00:39, 2 June 2003
- .... [[Trolls]] argue that the Content Wiki will be about consensus so the [[Opinion Wiki]] or the troll proposed [[The Consumerium Exchange]] must be about con4 KB (736 words) - 03:23, 11 March 2004
- #REDIRECT [[Opinion Wiki]]26 bytes (3 words) - 21:27, 18 October 2003
- ...w before horde(s) of [[trolls]] edited. Or see [[best cases]] for how the opinion wiki should enable the whole project.'' ...ll at all - hence we use '''opinion''' for now, and maybe consider that '''opinion''' can be seen as '''research''' by those who really believe in the premise11 KB (1,748 words) - 16:51, 5 August 2004
Page text matches
- '''Opinion change is a [[feature]] of an [[campaign]]''' ...ges. If a certain proportion of the [[campaigner]]s call for a [[vote]] on opinion change such a vote will be arranged and as a result a "fierce" call for [[b571 bytes (98 words) - 00:39, 2 June 2003
- ...sest anyone has come so far. Accordingly we might ask [[Fred Bauder]] his opinion on this question: ...n a [[Publish Wiki]] will always contain a lot of what some people call "[[opinion]]".750 bytes (121 words) - 16:55, 5 August 2004
- don't have time to form a full opinion on an issue, you could do worse than looking at RF's opinion and voting exactly opposite them. -Snowspinner[http://mail.wikipedia.org/pi972 bytes (163 words) - 19:08, 26 June 2004
- #REDIRECT [[Opinion Wiki]]26 bytes (3 words) - 21:27, 18 October 2003
- This is a better name for the [[Opinion Wiki]] discussion. Here's why [[trolls]] think so: ...sted than'' that of the "[[Content Wiki]]". If so, who needs it? Unless "Opinion" is just "talk:" applied to "Content"...4 KB (617 words) - 01:54, 21 May 2004
- *[[Opinion Wiki]] **[[Opinion change]]558 bytes (81 words) - 13:42, 12 April 2021
- ...limited or "bugged up" to make it useless. There is no incentive, (in the opinion of 142.177.X.X) once GetWiki dies, for MediaWiki's developers (some of whom ...i just to have a hedge against the [[sysop power structure]], which in the opinion of 142.177.X.X controls Mediawiki code.3 KB (480 words) - 13:44, 29 September 2004
- ...Eye view]] in disguise, and point to the nonsense idea that "research and opinion can be differentiated objectively" as an example of it polluting [[Consumer446 bytes (71 words) - 17:20, 30 June 2004
- It's not clear who has worse no-body-expressing-opinion problems, Metaweb or Consumerium, but, whichever does, should set the stand397 bytes (64 words) - 17:00, 17 October 2003
- ...by marginalizing critiques of Wikipedia as if they were just one person's opinion: ...t these things done also by the same people in your [[Content Wiki]] and [[Opinion Wiki]], you will have to clearly state what's wrong with these policies, an2 KB (268 words) - 19:28, 13 April 2004
- '''The [[Consumerium]] Exchange''' is where people can voice their opinion on which [[disputed article]] or [[campaign]] is closest to the [[truth]] a ...combined measurement for different opinions, which determines the default opinion shown to the [[consumer]] on each issue.4 KB (656 words) - 01:16, 25 June 2004
- '''Funded troll'''s are paid to change opinions in the [[Opinion Wiki]] or alter the way that the project works in ways that favour those wh ...s seems really unlikely if [[marketing]] starts to depend heavily on the [[Opinion Wiki]] here or other traits of [[Consumerium:Itself]].2 KB (247 words) - 11:36, 11 July 2005
- will be [[opinion wiki]] where strict syntax will be [[opinion wiki]]. [[publish wiki]] will import from3 KB (400 words) - 18:38, 24 July 2004
- ...oduction of [[Campaign]] management by [[Wiki]] and the included idea of [[Opinion Wiki]] accepting and handling votes this scheme is a little broken ...Research Wiki]] and [[Signal Wiki]] to somehow overthrow the old plan of [[Opinion Wiki]] and [[Content Wiki]] it is unclear what goes where and how [[Wiki ma2 KB (345 words) - 03:11, 28 March 2004
- ...ed bank. Didn't you read this is Juxo's day off so he's not formulating an opinion today?352 bytes (54 words) - 13:43, 18 April 2004
- Suppose two wikis, I'll call them [[Opinion Wiki]] and [[Content Wiki]] as working titles. ...ter security (HTTPS?) for [[Content Wiki]] without performance losses in [[Opinion Wiki]]3 KB (433 words) - 19:34, 24 July 2018
- ...together a [[Unified wiki]] approach that unifies the [[Content Wiki]] + [[Opinion Wiki]] (or [[Research Wiki]] + [[Publish Wiki]]) under one wiki. This is no550 bytes (88 words) - 14:51, 21 June 2005
- ...tly we are mostly focusing on [[campaign]] management [[wiki]] style in [[Opinion Wiki]], from whereon information will be aggregated to provide composite in479 bytes (70 words) - 05:33, 16 October 2003
- ...e ever get around to such a decision: in general, the difference between "opinion" and "research" is who you trust, i.e. which [[faction]], and if you have a ...oregion]]) or a piece of [[advertising]] which is clearly promotional. An opinion starts as the lowest-credibility form of research and those who provide it6 KB (1,000 words) - 18:24, 20 September 2004
- *[[Opinion Wiki]] - Where the campaigning is managed701 bytes (108 words) - 20:36, 15 October 2003
- ...e DB of some 350 big companies with well researched information and public opinion632 bytes (94 words) - 18:39, 21 September 2004
- '''A Campaigner is someone who is participating in a [[Campaign]] in the [[Opinion Wiki]] by:'''906 bytes (151 words) - 16:24, 4 November 2004
- ...ser]] vs. [[Verified User]]. ''Groups and VirtualGroups as described in [[Opinion Wiki]] '''may''' be implemented here, mostly likely as [[faction]]s and [[t <small>'''Publish Wiki''' will take on the role of [[Opinion Wiki]], which was an ad-hoc development purpose name for discovering how [[3 KB (396 words) - 18:48, 27 August 2005
- ...ganization]] will keep a close eye on sysops in the [[content wiki]] and [[opinion wiki]], and will govern them and give them more or less power depending sol905 bytes (140 words) - 01:04, 8 September 2004
- === Content vs. opinion - where is neutrality possible? desirable? === ...is disputed in the content wiki? Removing isolating disputed claims to [[Opinion Wiki]] circles is not enough.4 KB (618 words) - 17:38, 2 July 2004
- "Scenarios should include extremes and those that contradict popular opinion" - Algorithmics Inc., probably the world's most advanced scenario analysis864 bytes (130 words) - 16:52, 25 November 2003
- ...ho dispute the ability of anyone to tell "sympathetic" from "critical" or "opinion" from "research", would prefer that this article be from a very critical PO ...t]]s to prevail in [[Publish Wiki]] as long as there is such a thing as "[[Opinion Wiki]]" which requires vandalism ([[sysop vandalism|someone deciding things5 KB (749 words) - 12:00, 23 September 2004
- ...is, rather than rely on [[Consumerium researchers]] exclusively for their opinion of say which [[standard label]]s were about to become important, it would b1 KB (184 words) - 16:15, 24 November 2003
- ...ther material will be spun off into [[Research Wiki]], formerly known as [[Opinion Wiki]], which will be a [[large public wiki]] with slightly better [[govern ...because before the distinction between [[Content Wiki]] (for facts) and [[Opinion Wiki]] (for subjective views and campaigns based on subjective criteria) wa5 KB (793 words) - 19:34, 22 March 2004
- ...specify how any [[improvement]] that is generated in the [[R&D wiki]] or [[opinion wiki]] or [[Consumerium maintenance]] etc. is to be documented, published,1 KB (173 words) - 20:59, 24 November 2003
- ...g [[product]]s within a [[product group]] by their composite rating from [[Opinion Wiki]] might be a partial solution. Perhaps [[Campaign]]s could have other ...onmental friendliness and it can maybe done by utilizing composites from [[Opinion Wiki]]3 KB (459 words) - 04:04, 4 December 2003
- :Ummm. No, not in my humble opinion. I've been thinking about the [[score|score scale]] for a long time and I'v ...any country, but rather trust the usual methods ie. [[campaigns]] in the [[Opinion Wiki]] to do that, but I see your motivation for writing this article and '3 KB (597 words) - 15:19, 16 October 2003
- ...se if they found information they had placed in a [[content wiki]] or an [[opinion wiki]] was being used in ways that was detrimental to their business or rep1 KB (169 words) - 17:46, 22 November 2003
- *[[faction]]s - representing differences of opinion within the system itself1 KB (198 words) - 19:10, 9 April 2004
- ...the [[company]] in question and it's executives via [[Content Wiki]] and [[Opinion Wiki]].545 bytes (80 words) - 11:50, 14 July 2012
- Instead, Surowiecki's "Wise crowds" are described as having (1) diversity of opinion; (2) independence of members from one another; (3) decentralization; and (41 KB (225 words) - 21:58, 18 July 2004
- ...d. ''See [[Talk:Development_Wiki]] for debate on the naming scheme, and [[Opinion Wiki]] for how it might work.'' <small>This bears similarity to [[Opinion Wiki]], which is now mostly planned to be implemented in the [[Signal Wiki]2 KB (320 words) - 15:58, 24 April 2012
- ...gh a [[glossary]] defined by a [[faction]] through its own subset of the [[opinion wiki]]. Rules for this are not the same as those of the [[content wiki]].1 KB (247 words) - 08:08, 24 November 2003
- :"I really want a separate Opinion Wiki simply because we can aggregate data (votes on campaigns etc.) via SQL1 KB (229 words) - 16:05, 26 June 2004
- merits of, the [[product]]. Probably filtered from [[opinion wiki]].1 KB (243 words) - 05:31, 25 October 2003
- ...ate page|typical]] [[Research Wiki]] page of [[fact]]s, [[allegation]]s, [[opinion]]s, and [[claim]]s, all in a single organized [[Consumerium: intermediate p ...ial elements that allow you to [[vote]] and do other things to make your [[opinion]] heard4 KB (533 words) - 14:37, 9 September 2004
- ::[[WikiVote]] - a type of vote cast for a [[campaign]] in [[Opinion Wiki]]. Also other types of votes have been proposed see [[Voting]] or [[Vo *[[Opinion Wiki]]/[[Research Wiki]] - two names for the same thing, though some concep4 KB (547 words) - 14:22, 14 May 2005
- ...must make this choice and put "non-factual statements" into a separate '''Opinion Wiki''' while the "approved facts" are respected in the [[Research Wiki]] w1 KB (244 words) - 01:37, 6 August 2004
- ...make [[features|information]], both [[Content Wiki|objective facts]] and [[Opinion Wiki|subjective opinions]] locally and globally available to you. Ease of u1 KB (228 words) - 12:02, 18 March 2004
- ...will result. That GodKing is not a lawyer, however, so this belief in his opinion is only [[groupthink]], and probably quite dangerous.2 KB (249 words) - 22:15, 18 June 2004
- *Active in [[Content Wiki]] or [[Opinion Wiki]]? ===[[Opinion Wiki]] evaluation preferences===4 KB (675 words) - 17:11, 2 December 2003
- ...'' about something or '''facts''' about someones '''support''' for some '''opinion''' Now the strict multilevel security measures described in [[Opinion Wiki]] will have to be played down to make [[Signal Wiki]] operation more f6 KB (1,000 words) - 20:15, 14 March 2004
- ....com/205/the-best-forex-robot-in-the-world-for-big-profits/>forex auto</a> Opinion poll, quantities matured another 41% among '07 as well as 08.<><>|]2 KB (216 words) - 15:43, 18 June 2010
- *those who contribute to the [[opinion wiki]]1 KB (219 words) - 21:02, 25 November 2003
- ...llenge biases, which just lets them be summed up to become a sort of group opinion, e.g. as in an [[echo chamber]].2 KB (303 words) - 13:50, 4 March 2004
- The [[Content Wiki]] will have more need for such a process than [[Opinion Wiki]], since its content directly alters the [[consumerium buying signal]]2 KB (272 words) - 03:58, 16 February 2004
- :A:Our back end relies on [[opinion wiki]] comments compiled by software using a [[wikitext standard]]. [[Sema2 KB (286 words) - 02:10, 8 June 2004
- Using [[Wiki code]] to encode and store [[Content wiki|facts]] and [[Opinion wiki|opinions]] enables '''anyone''' with:2 KB (247 words) - 14:25, 24 November 2003
- ...to make to the MediaWiki software to enable running [[Content Wiki]] and [[Opinion Wiki]]. A similar page exists for each other [[wiki code]] option. ...-subsitution which is really useful for displaying [[campaign]] stats in [[Opinion Wiki]] articles among other things.11 KB (1,801 words) - 12:55, 6 June 2004
- International trade has it's good and bad sides. The opinion about what is good and what is bad about it vary strongly in the [[politica2 KB (269 words) - 13:15, 21 September 2004
- ===[[Opinion Wiki]]===2 KB (236 words) - 14:41, 26 August 2005
- ...bureaucracy in a gov't handles "content" and the politicians only handle "opinion"? I think it isn't.5 KB (726 words) - 17:50, 2 September 2004
- ...ecessity of fulfilling those requests to the [[company]] in question via [[Opinion Wiki]] and [[Content Wiki]]. Naturally fulfilled [[Workplace Upgrade|Workpl2 KB (289 words) - 22:00, 29 November 2003
- ...mply that [[Campaigns]] are maintained in the [[Signal Wiki]] instead of [[Opinion Wiki]] (which you strangely equate with [[Research Wiki]]) ...idea to distinguishing [[Consumerium Services]] into two [[Wikis]], the [[Opinion Wiki]] with stricter semantics, higher access security and more controlled8 KB (1,326 words) - 17:49, 5 March 2004
- *"research and opinion can be differentiated objectively"2 KB (317 words) - 17:23, 30 June 2004
- The people who developed the MIPS were of the opinion that [[material]]s displacement and usage were of more importance than the945 bytes (151 words) - 12:43, 28 October 2018
- *[[Opinion Wiki]]2 KB (225 words) - 17:01, 6 February 2005
- ...nd propaganda useless. Wiki can cope with all the complexities of multiple opinion systems and will lead to more transparency and new decision processes anywa2 KB (273 words) - 17:25, 2 July 2004
- .../wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Opinion_Wiki" class='internal' title="Opinion Wiki">Opinion Wiki</a> (9366 bytes)</li>7 KB (971 words) - 17:52, 9 February 2004
- ...ne vote when meeting is called to make decisions ([[split]], [[merge]]r, [[opinion change]], [[nullify]]ing) of the campaign ...e the introduction of Campaign management by Wiki and the included idea of Opinion Wiki accepting and handling votes this scheme is a little broken5 KB (706 words) - 21:33, 27 September 2006
- What is the application of person_DTD in cium in your opinion? Automatic [[w:nepotism]] through [[w:FOAF]]?3 KB (483 words) - 08:16, 27 April 2003
- ...would damage the credibility of the vote and of my software. This is in my opinion a strong argument in favour of having the vote conducted on a separate secu :::It's my opinion, idiot. Not amateur psychiatry or a pronouncement of absolute truth from a5 KB (877 words) - 12:49, 19 May 2010
- ...Wiki]] or [[Publish Wiki]] and certainly can't determine "what is just an Opinion" on his or her own2 KB (382 words) - 14:42, 29 July 2004
- ...w before horde(s) of [[trolls]] edited. Or see [[best cases]] for how the opinion wiki should enable the whole project.'' ...ll at all - hence we use '''opinion''' for now, and maybe consider that '''opinion''' can be seen as '''research''' by those who really believe in the premise11 KB (1,748 words) - 16:51, 5 August 2004
- ...one [[faction]], or otherwise make a statement that it is only one group's opinion.3 KB (425 words) - 18:41, 26 February 2004
- ...ere and how to do this [[The Consumerium Exchange]] and [[Opinion Wiki|The Opinion Wiki]]5 KB (750 words) - 20:46, 25 March 2004
- ...other may be infidel is they stops looking for your advice or perhaps your opinion about major decisions inside their lives. <br><br>Are they able for getting3 KB (573 words) - 10:14, 26 July 2016
- ...ate the articles in [[Publish Wiki]] with the aggregate information from [[Opinion Wiki]] with highlights and links to the whole mess of opinions --[[User:Jux ...achievable goal. Determining what "should be shoved out of sight as mere opinion" is not simple, not achievable, impossible and (most important) [[factional12 KB (1,961 words) - 15:23, 6 July 2017
- ...may bring up a certain fact - that can be balanced by bringing in counter-opinion, not by psychiatry or slandering early authors2 KB (400 words) - 21:30, 21 May 2004
- ...ouch with potential pitfalls in investments by using aggregate data from [[Opinion Wiki]] thus stay safe of investing in possibly destructive business venture2 KB (308 words) - 21:34, 1 March 2004
- ...w as the R&D Wiki, where we are planning operation of [[Research Wiki]], [[Opinion Wiki]] and [[Publish Wiki]](s) ...greements about various [[ISMs]]. Also opposition for re-introduction of [[Opinion Wiki]] into the total plan of how to make this workable in the real world i8 KB (1,220 words) - 19:17, 23 April 2012
- ...ke''' (No distinct [[Signal Wiki]]/[[Research Wiki]] or [[Content Wiki]]/[[Opinion Wiki]] or [[Research Wiki]]/[[Publish Wiki]] distinction.) [[How many wikis3 KB (474 words) - 14:46, 24 January 2005
- ...i_modifications Modifications required/helpful in running Content Wiki and Opinion Wiki]2 KB (302 words) - 18:57, 23 July 2013
- ...m]] must be able to do an '''[[XML]] dump''' of the [[Content Wiki]] and [[Opinion Wiki]] at any time, if the material in them is [[GFDL]]:1 KB (245 words) - 10:02, 16 August 2012
- ...ects where [[faction]]s do not agree), which go to [[Research Wiki]] aka [[Opinion Wiki]] where further research is performed. Whatever it is called, this co ...h will be stored when it gets built. Facts require more discipline than [[opinion wiki]] comments. When we say "fact" we mean [[instructional capital]] that6 KB (977 words) - 15:53, 28 August 2004
- ...cts between users''' must take limited cognizance of their status on the [[Opinion Wiki]] or [[Content Wiki]]. ''These are guidelines for resolving conflicts3 KB (519 words) - 18:57, 11 February 2004
- ...ween the initial action ("to [[troll]]"), the [[Sysop Vandal point of view|opinion or process that leads to the sysop reaction]], the output of that action, e3 KB (429 words) - 15:55, 5 September 2004
- ...ects where [[faction]]s do not agree), which go to [[Research Wiki]] aka [[Opinion Wiki]] where further research is performed. Whatever it is called, this co ...h will be stored when it gets built. Facts require more discipline than [[opinion wiki]] comments. When we say "fact" we mean [[instructional capital]] that7 KB (1,005 words) - 05:26, 29 August 2004
- ([[Opinion Wiki]]) ([[Opinion Wiki]])11 KB (1,652 words) - 11:29, 9 September 2023
- ...in a database, but some of these assertions may be scattered around the [[opinion wiki]] or talk pages in [[content wiki]]. In general we should not be shy3 KB (510 words) - 01:16, 26 November 2003
- *[[Opinion Wiki]]/[[Research Wiki]] - two names for the same thing, though some concep ::[[WikiVote]] - a type of vote cast for a [[campaign]] in [[Opinion Wiki]]. Also other types of votes have been proposed see [[The Consumerium5 KB (762 words) - 10:41, 27 May 2022
- ...Exchange]] type of collation of opinions. Notice the design change from [[Opinion Wiki]] plans wherein the [[score]] was a sub-page of the [[campaign]] in qu4 KB (594 words) - 16:39, 2 March 2004
- ...'s space for all, there's no need for a selective fight of opinions: every opinion is welcomed, as every criticism. Respect, courtesy and tolerance are a must3 KB (493 words) - 17:26, 25 November 2004
- ...directly and the [[Research Wiki]] indirectly) is up for debate. ''See [[Opinion Wiki]], the old name for the research wiki, for a more complete description2 KB (339 words) - 14:25, 12 April 2021
- .... [[Trolls]] argue that the Content Wiki will be about consensus so the [[Opinion Wiki]] or the troll proposed [[The Consumerium Exchange]] must be about con4 KB (736 words) - 03:23, 11 March 2004
- ...log]] report that updates the live servers with the [[content wiki]] and [[opinion wiki]] on them, with the reports from the field.4 KB (636 words) - 01:19, 27 October 2003
- ...[God's Eye View]] required to make such statements other than as their own opinion, and these opinions are arbitrary, unverifiable, and unshared with people o4 KB (598 words) - 09:04, 14 July 2004
- ...f brands, membership to the most influential lobbies, public relations and opinion making, managers name and position, shareholders and subsidiaries, plants l3 KB (445 words) - 12:14, 19 August 2012
- ...ode]] for almost everything as [[The Consumerium Exchange]] gave way for [[Opinion Wiki]] where opinions could persist and thru strict syntax rules data could4 KB (644 words) - 10:00, 1 March 2004
- *A medium for making [[Opinion Wiki|distribution]] and [[Content Wiki|acquisition]] of information on [[mo3 KB (462 words) - 19:05, 23 May 2012
- :Our back end relies on [[opinion wiki]] comments compiled by software using a [[wikitext standard]]. [[Sema4 KB (679 words) - 11:03, 11 July 2005
- Consumerium will rely on [[content wiki]] and [[opinion wiki]] comments compiled by software using a [[wikitext standard]]. [[Sema *[[The Consumerium Exchange]] or [[Opinion Wiki|The Opinion Wiki]] - Where strictly formed datastructures are used to record, archive a11 KB (1,777 words) - 17:41, 27 February 2004
- ...ns, that they cant be found paying, to show the class. The following to my opinion seemed to be the perfect execution associated with exactly how Daily Deals3 KB (519 words) - 17:49, 6 June 2014
- ...ated or disputed in this same wiki but are not edited there. A separate [[Opinion Wiki]] function is essential to the generating the [[Consumerium buying sig5 KB (798 words) - 22:02, 21 March 2004
- ...different on [[large public wiki]]s such as the [[Content Wiki]] and any [[Opinion Wiki]] facilities will become.5 KB (865 words) - 17:40, 6 September 2004
- *[[The Consumerium Exchange]] or [[Opinion Wiki|The Opinion Wiki]] - Where strictly formed datastructures are used to record, archive a ...ple English]] about issues with, or merits of, the product. All rely on [[opinion wiki]] comments compiled by software using a [[wikitext standard]]. [[Sema15 KB (2,510 words) - 15:06, 11 July 2013
- *'''Refutation of opinion'''. If you seek a troll's identity, as one troll said you are making an "on ...eek a troll's identity to destroy that troll, and note under refutation of opinion in the criteria above that this may be less of an issue than the troll coll13 KB (2,151 words) - 01:14, 8 September 2004
- ...i have really pressing non-consumerium issues i have to attend to? [[Talk:Opinion Wiki]] was good stuff, thanks for it. ...gure out the rules which will be used to govern the [[Content Wiki]] and [[Opinion Wiki]]. Like who gets to write what and who gets to delete what on what gro21 KB (3,475 words) - 17:24, 25 September 2006
- ...otential pitfalls in investments by using aggregate data compiled in the [[Opinion Wiki]]/[[Research Wiki]] thus staying safe of investing in possibly destruc6 KB (930 words) - 16:07, 2 March 2004
- ...don't work. So the references will be to [[Development Wiki]], with the [[Opinion Wiki]] renamed [[Research Wiki]], and [[Content Wiki]] renamed [[Signal Wik7 KB (1,152 words) - 20:41, 4 July 2010
- ...would be more representative of actual current state of the field, in the opinion of people who have nothing to do with [[Wikimedia]], and don't know which i8 KB (1,251 words) - 17:05, 4 August 2004
- ...('''[[w:ESOMAR|ESOMAR]]''') is a world association for market, social and opinion researchers.17 KB (2,496 words) - 13:05, 30 June 2020
- :Trolls request that [[User:Juxo]] state some opinion about the issue at [[User_talk:Angela]] (deleting talk files that contain c5 KB (833 words) - 15:23, 6 July 2017
- :A:Our back end relies on [[opinion wiki]] comments compiled by software using a [[wikitext standard]]. [[Sema8 KB (1,301 words) - 07:02, 7 June 2004
- ...igion]], [[w:nationality|nationality]], or [[w:political opinion|political opinion]]; because they are a member of a persecuted social category of persons; or11 KB (1,651 words) - 16:48, 30 July 2020
- ...vide my DNA, because I can just pay others to front for me and pretend the opinion I pay them to have, is theirs. The only thing you can do is make it cost m19 KB (3,420 words) - 10:24, 18 July 2016
- ...h other. Nor does it implement some features of the [[content wiki]] or [[opinion wiki]] that will be needed eventually to deliver [[Consumerium Services]] s7 KB (1,078 words) - 10:07, 21 September 2021
- ...t, until he performs [[sysop vandalism]] on that article too, to "make his opinion correct" as seems to be his habit). But the only obvious racist is EN: Wik5 KB (773 words) - 15:23, 6 July 2017
- ...f brands, membership to the most influential lobbies, public relations and opinion making, managers name and position, shareholders and subsidiaries, plants l ...organizations and industry-friendly experts that work to influence public opinion and public policy on behalf of corporations, governments and special intere17 KB (2,404 words) - 17:04, 12 April 2021
- ...try to merge the material from [[Content Wiki]], [[TCE]], [[Campaigns]], [[Opinion Wiki]], [[Direct Vote]]s,�[[Indirect Vote]]s and [[WikiVote]]s to these a ...hers, and development. Calling what they do or say "R&D" or "content" or "opinion" is an overlay of YOUR values on THEM. A good system does as little of thi18 KB (2,978 words) - 12:01, 11 February 2022
- ...the content into the more advanced environment when it's built. Whether [[Opinion Wiki]] and [[Content Wiki]] should be intgrated into one wiki is unresolved7 KB (1,109 words) - 15:23, 6 July 2017
- ...pen-if-we-randomly-gave-poor-families-now-we-know/ Washington Post "global opinion" article 'What would happen if we randomly gave $1,000 to poor families? No8 KB (1,022 words) - 15:36, 19 February 2021
- ...[[142.177.X.X|142]] for the upteenth time that i really want a separate [[Opinion Wiki]] simply because we can aggregate data ([[vote]]s on [[campaigns]] etc8 KB (1,386 words) - 15:23, 6 July 2017
- ...e are serious practical issues to resolve like licensing schemes used in [[Opinion Wiki]] and [[Content Wiki]] and of course the issue of how to not get sued.7 KB (1,220 words) - 15:23, 6 July 2017
- Wiki management of the [[Content Wiki]] and [[Opinion Wiki]], and the [[sysop power structure]] of each, is a major concern of [[10 KB (1,554 words) - 15:53, 3 June 2005
- ...n of researchable stuff from publishable stuff ) or [[Content Wiki]] and [[Opinion Wiki]] ( suggested by [[User:Juxo]], effort founder, focus on isolation of9 KB (1,308 words) - 12:28, 30 July 2020
- ...nsumerium Governance Organization]] members who care to socialize in the [[opinion wiki]] or talk associated with [[content wiki]].13 KB (2,283 words) - 14:34, 15 August 2004
- ..., create some statement that WE* agree on and can present to others as OUR opinion or best assembly of the facts. The highly confused and ideological [[Meatb14 KB (2,155 words) - 21:35, 9 September 2004
- ...Campaign]]s are about opinions and facts to convince other people that the opinion is constructive.14 KB (2,476 words) - 00:32, 9 October 2003
- ...g [[Consumerium Data Whorehouse]] anytime it appears again because I in my opinion it does not qualify for an article name. ::So this is NOT "R&D", this is "Juxo's [[Opinion Wiki]]" ultimately? This is assuming that you understand naming and org pr35 KB (5,819 words) - 10:08, 25 November 2012
- ..., create some statement that WE* agree on and can present to others as OUR opinion or best assembly of the facts. The highly confused and ideological [[Meatb14 KB (2,286 words) - 14:00, 3 January 2005
- ...ter the "election" of [[Wikimedia Board of Trustees]] who evidently had no opinion that mattered, on this all-important question.18 KB (2,874 words) - 15:46, 28 September 2004
- ...[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] deleted "Research Wiki" <em>(content was: '#REDIRECT [[Opinion Wiki]]')</em></li>45 KB (6,313 words) - 16:28, 9 May 2005
- ...-13 Majority of TCE implementation moved to be the responsibility of The [[Opinion Wiki]]16 KB (2,154 words) - 12:37, 7 December 2022
- ...[[w:social group|social group]], an [[w:organization|organization]]) is an opinion about that entity, typically a result of social evaluation on a set of crit19 KB (2,698 words) - 13:07, 30 June 2020
- ...egarding either the truth or the falsity of a proposition, or of a body of opinion; likewise regarding either the rectitude or the depravity of a line of cond32 KB (4,865 words) - 12:53, 30 June 2020
- ...egarding either the truth or the falsity of a proposition, or of a body of opinion; likewise regarding either the rectitude or the depravity of a line of cond32 KB (4,923 words) - 12:38, 30 June 2020
- # opinion, -i, -e == an opinion (also mendim)44 KB (6,641 words) - 12:45, 23 June 2020
- * '''Opinion leader'''58 KB (8,262 words) - 13:04, 30 June 2020
- ...''' '''review''' published in Current Opinion in Rheumatology ([[w:Current Opinion (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins)]])155 KB (20,498 words) - 17:51, 13 August 2023