Search results

Page title matches

  • #REDIRECT [[Opinion Wiki]]
    26 bytes (3 words) - 21:27, 18 October 2003
  • ...w before horde(s) of [[trolls]] edited. Or see [[best cases]] for how the opinion wiki should enable the whole project.'' ...ll at all - hence we use '''opinion''' for now, and maybe consider that '''opinion''' can be seen as '''research''' by those who really believe in the premise
    11 KB (1,748 words) - 16:51, 5 August 2004
  • '''Opinion change is a [[feature]] of an [[campaign]]''' ...ges. If a certain proportion of the [[campaigner]]s call for a [[vote]] on opinion change such a vote will be arranged and as a result a "fierce" call for [[b
    571 bytes (98 words) - 00:39, 2 June 2003

Page text matches

  • '''Opinion change is a [[feature]] of an [[campaign]]''' ...ges. If a certain proportion of the [[campaigner]]s call for a [[vote]] on opinion change such a vote will be arranged and as a result a "fierce" call for [[b
    571 bytes (98 words) - 00:39, 2 June 2003
  • ...sest anyone has come so far. Accordingly we might ask [[Fred Bauder]] his opinion on this question: ...n a [[Publish Wiki]] will always contain a lot of what some people call "[[opinion]]".
    750 bytes (121 words) - 16:55, 5 August 2004
  • #REDIRECT [[Opinion Wiki]]
    26 bytes (3 words) - 21:27, 18 October 2003
  • *[[Opinion Wiki]] **[[Opinion change]]
    558 bytes (81 words) - 13:42, 12 April 2021
  • It's not clear who has worse no-body-expressing-opinion problems, Metaweb or Consumerium, but, whichever does, should set the stand
    397 bytes (64 words) - 17:00, 17 October 2003
  • '''The [[Consumerium]] Exchange''' is where people can voice their opinion on which [[disputed article]] or [[campaign]] is closest to the [[truth]] a ...combined measurement for different opinions, which determines the default opinion shown to the [[consumer]] on each issue.
    4 KB (656 words) - 01:16, 25 June 2004
  • '''Funded troll'''s are paid to change opinions in the [[Opinion Wiki]] or alter the way that the project works in ways that favour those wh ...s seems really unlikely if [[marketing]] starts to depend heavily on the [[Opinion Wiki]] here or other traits of [[Consumerium:Itself]].
    2 KB (247 words) - 11:36, 11 July 2005
  • *[[Opinion Wiki]] - Where the campaigning is managed
    701 bytes (108 words) - 20:36, 15 October 2003
  • ...e DB of some 350 big companies with well researched information and public opinion
    632 bytes (94 words) - 18:39, 21 September 2004
  • '''A Campaigner is someone who is participating in a [[Campaign]] in the [[Opinion Wiki]] by:'''
    906 bytes (151 words) - 16:24, 4 November 2004
  • ...ser]] vs. [[Verified User]]. ''Groups and VirtualGroups as described in [[Opinion Wiki]] '''may''' be implemented here, mostly likely as [[faction]]s and [[t <small>'''Publish Wiki''' will take on the role of [[Opinion Wiki]], which was an ad-hoc development purpose name for discovering how [[
    3 KB (396 words) - 18:48, 27 August 2005
  • ...ganization]] will keep a close eye on sysops in the [[content wiki]] and [[opinion wiki]], and will govern them and give them more or less power depending sol
    905 bytes (140 words) - 01:04, 8 September 2004
  • === Content vs. opinion - where is neutrality possible? desirable? === ...is disputed in the content wiki? Removing isolating disputed claims to [[Opinion Wiki]] circles is not enough.
    4 KB (618 words) - 17:38, 2 July 2004
  • "Scenarios should include extremes and those that contradict popular opinion" - Algorithmics Inc., probably the world's most advanced scenario analysis
    864 bytes (130 words) - 16:52, 25 November 2003
  • ...is, rather than rely on [[Consumerium researchers]] exclusively for their opinion of say which [[standard label]]s were about to become important, it would b
    1 KB (184 words) - 16:15, 24 November 2003
  • ...specify how any [[improvement]] that is generated in the [[R&D wiki]] or [[opinion wiki]] or [[Consumerium maintenance]] etc. is to be documented, published,
    1 KB (173 words) - 20:59, 24 November 2003
  • ...se if they found information they had placed in a [[content wiki]] or an [[opinion wiki]] was being used in ways that was detrimental to their business or rep
    1 KB (169 words) - 17:46, 22 November 2003
  • *[[faction]]s - representing differences of opinion within the system itself
    1 KB (198 words) - 19:10, 9 April 2004
  • ...the [[company]] in question and it's executives via [[Content Wiki]] and [[Opinion Wiki]].
    545 bytes (80 words) - 11:50, 14 July 2012
  • Instead, Surowiecki's "Wise crowds" are described as having (1) diversity of opinion; (2) independence of members from one another; (3) decentralization; and (4
    1 KB (225 words) - 21:58, 18 July 2004
  • ...d. ''See [[Talk:Development_Wiki]] for debate on the naming scheme, and [[Opinion Wiki]] for how it might work.'' <small>This bears similarity to [[Opinion Wiki]], which is now mostly planned to be implemented in the [[Signal Wiki]
    2 KB (320 words) - 15:58, 24 April 2012
  • ...gh a [[glossary]] defined by a [[faction]] through its own subset of the [[opinion wiki]]. Rules for this are not the same as those of the [[content wiki]].
    1 KB (247 words) - 08:08, 24 November 2003
  • :"I really want a separate Opinion Wiki simply because we can aggregate data (votes on campaigns etc.) via SQL
    1 KB (229 words) - 16:05, 26 June 2004
  • merits of, the [[product]]. Probably filtered from [[opinion wiki]].
    1 KB (243 words) - 05:31, 25 October 2003
  • ::[[WikiVote]] - a type of vote cast for a [[campaign]] in [[Opinion Wiki]]. Also other types of votes have been proposed see [[Voting]] or [[Vo *[[Opinion Wiki]]/[[Research Wiki]] - two names for the same thing, though some concep
    4 KB (547 words) - 14:22, 14 May 2005
  • ...must make this choice and put "non-factual statements" into a separate '''Opinion Wiki''' while the "approved facts" are respected in the [[Research Wiki]] w
    1 KB (244 words) - 01:37, 6 August 2004
  • *Active in [[Content Wiki]] or [[Opinion Wiki]]? ===[[Opinion Wiki]] evaluation preferences===
    4 KB (675 words) - 17:11, 2 December 2003
  • *those who contribute to the [[opinion wiki]]
    1 KB (219 words) - 21:02, 25 November 2003
  • ...llenge biases, which just lets them be summed up to become a sort of group opinion, e.g. as in an [[echo chamber]].
    2 KB (303 words) - 13:50, 4 March 2004
  • The [[Content Wiki]] will have more need for such a process than [[Opinion Wiki]], since its content directly alters the [[consumerium buying signal]]
    2 KB (272 words) - 03:58, 16 February 2004
  • International trade has it's good and bad sides. The opinion about what is good and what is bad about it vary strongly in the [[politica
    2 KB (269 words) - 13:15, 21 September 2004
  • ===[[Opinion Wiki]]===
    2 KB (236 words) - 14:41, 26 August 2005
  • ...bureaucracy in a gov't handles "content" and the politicians only handle "opinion"? I think it isn't.
    5 KB (726 words) - 17:50, 2 September 2004
  • ...ecessity of fulfilling those requests to the [[company]] in question via [[Opinion Wiki]] and [[Content Wiki]]. Naturally fulfilled [[Workplace Upgrade|Workpl
    2 KB (289 words) - 22:00, 29 November 2003
  • *"research and opinion can be differentiated objectively"
    2 KB (317 words) - 17:23, 30 June 2004
  • The people who developed the MIPS were of the opinion that [[material]]s displacement and usage were of more importance than the
    945 bytes (151 words) - 12:43, 28 October 2018
  • *[[Opinion Wiki]]
    2 KB (225 words) - 17:01, 6 February 2005
  • ...nd propaganda useless. Wiki can cope with all the complexities of multiple opinion systems and will lead to more transparency and new decision processes anywa
    2 KB (273 words) - 17:25, 2 July 2004
  • ...ne vote when meeting is called to make decisions ([[split]], [[merge]]r, [[opinion change]], [[nullify]]ing) of the campaign ...e the introduction of Campaign management by Wiki and the included idea of Opinion Wiki accepting and handling votes this scheme is a little broken
    5 KB (706 words) - 21:33, 27 September 2006
  • ...Wiki]] or [[Publish Wiki]] and certainly can't determine "what is just an Opinion" on his or her own
    2 KB (382 words) - 14:42, 29 July 2004
  • ...w before horde(s) of [[trolls]] edited. Or see [[best cases]] for how the opinion wiki should enable the whole project.'' ...ll at all - hence we use '''opinion''' for now, and maybe consider that '''opinion''' can be seen as '''research''' by those who really believe in the premise
    11 KB (1,748 words) - 16:51, 5 August 2004
  • ...other may be infidel is they stops looking for your advice or perhaps your opinion about major decisions inside their lives. <br><br>Are they able for getting
    3 KB (573 words) - 10:14, 26 July 2016
  • ...may bring up a certain fact - that can be balanced by bringing in counter-opinion, not by psychiatry or slandering early authors
    2 KB (400 words) - 21:30, 21 May 2004
  • ...ouch with potential pitfalls in investments by using aggregate data from [[Opinion Wiki]] thus stay safe of investing in possibly destructive business venture
    2 KB (308 words) - 21:34, 1 March 2004
  • ...w as the R&D Wiki, where we are planning operation of [[Research Wiki]], [[Opinion Wiki]] and [[Publish Wiki]](s) ...greements about various [[ISMs]]. Also opposition for re-introduction of [[Opinion Wiki]] into the total plan of how to make this workable in the real world i
    8 KB (1,220 words) - 19:17, 23 April 2012
  • ...ke''' (No distinct [[Signal Wiki]]/[[Research Wiki]] or [[Content Wiki]]/[[Opinion Wiki]] or [[Research Wiki]]/[[Publish Wiki]] distinction.) [[How many wikis
    3 KB (474 words) - 14:46, 24 January 2005
  • ...i_modifications Modifications required/helpful in running Content Wiki and Opinion Wiki]
    2 KB (302 words) - 18:57, 23 July 2013
  • ...m]] must be able to do an '''[[XML]] dump''' of the [[Content Wiki]] and [[Opinion Wiki]] at any time, if the material in them is [[GFDL]]:
    1 KB (245 words) - 10:02, 16 August 2012
  • ...ects where [[faction]]s do not agree), which go to [[Research Wiki]] aka [[Opinion Wiki]] where further research is performed. Whatever it is called, this co ...h will be stored when it gets built. Facts require more discipline than [[opinion wiki]] comments. When we say "fact" we mean [[instructional capital]] that
    6 KB (977 words) - 15:53, 28 August 2004
  • ...cts between users''' must take limited cognizance of their status on the [[Opinion Wiki]] or [[Content Wiki]]. ''These are guidelines for resolving conflicts
    3 KB (519 words) - 18:57, 11 February 2004
  • ...ween the initial action ("to [[troll]]"), the [[Sysop Vandal point of view|opinion or process that leads to the sysop reaction]], the output of that action, e
    3 KB (429 words) - 15:55, 5 September 2004
  • ...ects where [[faction]]s do not agree), which go to [[Research Wiki]] aka [[Opinion Wiki]] where further research is performed. Whatever it is called, this co ...h will be stored when it gets built. Facts require more discipline than [[opinion wiki]] comments. When we say "fact" we mean [[instructional capital]] that
    7 KB (1,005 words) - 05:26, 29 August 2004
  • ([[Opinion Wiki]]) ([[Opinion Wiki]])
    11 KB (1,652 words) - 11:29, 9 September 2023
  • *[[Opinion Wiki]]/[[Research Wiki]] - two names for the same thing, though some concep ::[[WikiVote]] - a type of vote cast for a [[campaign]] in [[Opinion Wiki]]. Also other types of votes have been proposed see [[The Consumerium
    5 KB (762 words) - 10:41, 27 May 2022
  • ...'s space for all, there's no need for a selective fight of opinions: every opinion is welcomed, as every criticism. Respect, courtesy and tolerance are a must
    3 KB (493 words) - 17:26, 25 November 2004
  • ...directly and the [[Research Wiki]] indirectly) is up for debate. ''See [[Opinion Wiki]], the old name for the research wiki, for a more complete description
    2 KB (339 words) - 14:25, 12 April 2021
  • ...log]] report that updates the live servers with the [[content wiki]] and [[opinion wiki]] on them, with the reports from the field.
    4 KB (636 words) - 01:19, 27 October 2003
  • ...[God's Eye View]] required to make such statements other than as their own opinion, and these opinions are arbitrary, unverifiable, and unshared with people o
    4 KB (598 words) - 09:04, 14 July 2004
  • ...f brands, membership to the most influential lobbies, public relations and opinion making, managers name and position, shareholders and subsidiaries, plants l
    3 KB (445 words) - 12:14, 19 August 2012
  • Consumerium will rely on [[content wiki]] and [[opinion wiki]] comments compiled by software using a [[wikitext standard]]. [[Sema *[[The Consumerium Exchange]] or [[Opinion Wiki|The Opinion Wiki]] - Where strictly formed datastructures are used to record, archive a
    11 KB (1,777 words) - 17:41, 27 February 2004
  • ...ated or disputed in this same wiki but are not edited there. A separate [[Opinion Wiki]] function is essential to the generating the [[Consumerium buying sig
    5 KB (798 words) - 22:02, 21 March 2004
  • ...different on [[large public wiki]]s such as the [[Content Wiki]] and any [[Opinion Wiki]] facilities will become.
    5 KB (865 words) - 17:40, 6 September 2004
  • ...otential pitfalls in investments by using aggregate data compiled in the [[Opinion Wiki]]/[[Research Wiki]] thus staying safe of investing in possibly destruc
    6 KB (930 words) - 16:07, 2 March 2004
  • ...h other. Nor does it implement some features of the [[content wiki]] or [[opinion wiki]] that will be needed eventually to deliver [[Consumerium Services]] s
    7 KB (1,078 words) - 10:07, 21 September 2021
  • ...f brands, membership to the most influential lobbies, public relations and opinion making, managers name and position, shareholders and subsidiaries, plants l ...organizations and industry-friendly experts that work to influence public opinion and public policy on behalf of corporations, governments and special intere
    17 KB (2,404 words) - 17:04, 12 April 2021
  • ...pen-if-we-randomly-gave-poor-families-now-we-know/ Washington Post "global opinion" article 'What would happen if we randomly gave $1,000 to poor families? No
    8 KB (1,022 words) - 15:36, 19 February 2021
  • Wiki management of the [[Content Wiki]] and [[Opinion Wiki]], and the [[sysop power structure]] of each, is a major concern of [[
    10 KB (1,554 words) - 15:53, 3 June 2005
  • ...n of researchable stuff from publishable stuff ) or [[Content Wiki]] and [[Opinion Wiki]] ( suggested by [[User:Juxo]], effort founder, focus on isolation of
    9 KB (1,308 words) - 12:28, 30 July 2020
  • ...nsumerium Governance Organization]] members who care to socialize in the [[opinion wiki]] or talk associated with [[content wiki]].
    13 KB (2,283 words) - 14:34, 15 August 2004
  • ..., create some statement that WE* agree on and can present to others as OUR opinion or best assembly of the facts. The highly confused and ideological [[Meatb
    14 KB (2,155 words) - 21:35, 9 September 2004
  • ..., create some statement that WE* agree on and can present to others as OUR opinion or best assembly of the facts. The highly confused and ideological [[Meatb
    14 KB (2,286 words) - 14:00, 3 January 2005
  • ...ter the "election" of [[Wikimedia Board of Trustees]] who evidently had no opinion that mattered, on this all-important question.
    18 KB (2,874 words) - 15:46, 28 September 2004
  • ...-13 Majority of TCE implementation moved to be the responsibility of The [[Opinion Wiki]]
    16 KB (2,154 words) - 12:37, 7 December 2022