'''Opinion change is a [[feature]] of an [[campaign]]'''
...ges. If a certain proportion of the [[campaigner]]s call for a [[vote]] on opinion change such a vote will be arranged and as a result a "fierce" call for [[b
571 bytes (98 words) - 00:39, 2 June 2003
...sest anyone has come so far. Accordingly we might ask [[Fred Bauder]] his opinion on this question:
...n a [[Publish Wiki]] will always contain a lot of what some people call "[[opinion]]".
750 bytes (121 words) - 16:55, 5 August 2004
#REDIRECT [[Opinion Wiki]]
26 bytes (3 words) - 21:27, 18 October 2003
*[[Opinion Wiki]]
**[[Opinion change]]
558 bytes (81 words) - 13:42, 12 April 2021
It's not clear who has worse no-body-expressing-opinion problems, Metaweb or Consumerium, but, whichever does, should set the stand
397 bytes (64 words) - 17:00, 17 October 2003
'''The [[Consumerium]] Exchange''' is where people can voice their opinion on which [[disputed article]] or [[campaign]] is closest to the [[truth]] a
...combined measurement for different opinions, which determines the default opinion shown to the [[consumer]] on each issue.
4 KB (656 words) - 01:16, 25 June 2004
'''Funded troll'''s are paid to change opinions in the [[Opinion Wiki]] or alter the way that the project works in ways that favour those wh
...s seems really unlikely if [[marketing]] starts to depend heavily on the [[Opinion Wiki]] here or other traits of [[Consumerium:Itself]].
2 KB (247 words) - 11:36, 11 July 2005
*[[Opinion Wiki]] - Where the campaigning is managed
701 bytes (108 words) - 20:36, 15 October 2003
...e DB of some 350 big companies with well researched information and public opinion
632 bytes (94 words) - 18:39, 21 September 2004
'''A Campaigner is someone who is participating in a [[Campaign]] in the [[Opinion Wiki]] by:'''
906 bytes (151 words) - 16:24, 4 November 2004
...ser]] vs. [[Verified User]]. ''Groups and VirtualGroups as described in [[Opinion Wiki]] '''may''' be implemented here, mostly likely as [[faction]]s and [[t
<small>'''Publish Wiki''' will take on the role of [[Opinion Wiki]], which was an ad-hoc development purpose name for discovering how [[
3 KB (396 words) - 18:48, 27 August 2005
...ganization]] will keep a close eye on sysops in the [[content wiki]] and [[opinion wiki]], and will govern them and give them more or less power depending sol
905 bytes (140 words) - 01:04, 8 September 2004
=== Content vs. opinion - where is neutrality possible? desirable? ===
...is disputed in the content wiki? Removing isolating disputed claims to [[Opinion Wiki]] circles is not enough.
4 KB (618 words) - 17:38, 2 July 2004
"Scenarios should include extremes and those that contradict popular opinion" - Algorithmics Inc., probably the world's most advanced scenario analysis
864 bytes (130 words) - 16:52, 25 November 2003
...is, rather than rely on [[Consumerium researchers]] exclusively for their opinion of say which [[standard label]]s were about to become important, it would b
1 KB (184 words) - 16:15, 24 November 2003
...specify how any [[improvement]] that is generated in the [[R&D wiki]] or [[opinion wiki]] or [[Consumerium maintenance]] etc. is to be documented, published,
1 KB (173 words) - 20:59, 24 November 2003
...se if they found information they had placed in a [[content wiki]] or an [[opinion wiki]] was being used in ways that was detrimental to their business or rep
1 KB (169 words) - 17:46, 22 November 2003
*[[faction]]s - representing differences of opinion within the system itself
1 KB (198 words) - 19:10, 9 April 2004
...the [[company]] in question and it's executives via [[Content Wiki]] and [[Opinion Wiki]].
545 bytes (80 words) - 11:50, 14 July 2012
Instead, Surowiecki's "Wise crowds" are described as having (1) diversity of opinion; (2) independence of members from one another; (3) decentralization; and (4
1 KB (225 words) - 21:58, 18 July 2004
...d. ''See [[Talk:Development_Wiki]] for debate on the naming scheme, and [[Opinion Wiki]] for how it might work.''
<small>This bears similarity to [[Opinion Wiki]], which is now mostly planned to be implemented in the [[Signal Wiki]
2 KB (320 words) - 15:58, 24 April 2012
...gh a [[glossary]] defined by a [[faction]] through its own subset of the [[opinion wiki]]. Rules for this are not the same as those of the [[content wiki]].
1 KB (247 words) - 08:08, 24 November 2003
:"I really want a separate Opinion Wiki simply because we can aggregate data (votes on campaigns etc.) via SQL
1 KB (229 words) - 16:05, 26 June 2004
merits of, the [[product]]. Probably filtered from [[opinion wiki]].
1 KB (243 words) - 05:31, 25 October 2003
::[[WikiVote]] - a type of vote cast for a [[campaign]] in [[Opinion Wiki]]. Also other types of votes have been proposed see [[Voting]] or [[Vo
*[[Opinion Wiki]]/[[Research Wiki]] - two names for the same thing, though some concep
4 KB (547 words) - 14:22, 14 May 2005
...must make this choice and put "non-factual statements" into a separate '''Opinion Wiki''' while the "approved facts" are respected in the [[Research Wiki]] w
1 KB (244 words) - 01:37, 6 August 2004
*Active in [[Content Wiki]] or [[Opinion Wiki]]?
===[[Opinion Wiki]] evaluation preferences===
4 KB (675 words) - 17:11, 2 December 2003
*those who contribute to the [[opinion wiki]]
1 KB (219 words) - 21:02, 25 November 2003
...llenge biases, which just lets them be summed up to become a sort of group opinion, e.g. as in an [[echo chamber]].
2 KB (303 words) - 13:50, 4 March 2004
The [[Content Wiki]] will have more need for such a process than [[Opinion Wiki]], since its content directly alters the [[consumerium buying signal]]
2 KB (272 words) - 03:58, 16 February 2004
International trade has it's good and bad sides. The opinion about what is good and what is bad about it vary strongly in the [[politica
2 KB (269 words) - 13:15, 21 September 2004
===[[Opinion Wiki]]===
2 KB (236 words) - 14:41, 26 August 2005
...bureaucracy in a gov't handles "content" and the politicians only handle "opinion"? I think it isn't.
5 KB (726 words) - 17:50, 2 September 2004
...ecessity of fulfilling those requests to the [[company]] in question via [[Opinion Wiki]] and [[Content Wiki]]. Naturally fulfilled [[Workplace Upgrade|Workpl
2 KB (289 words) - 22:00, 29 November 2003
*"research and opinion can be differentiated objectively"
2 KB (317 words) - 17:23, 30 June 2004
The people who developed the MIPS were of the opinion that [[material]]s displacement and usage were of more importance than the
945 bytes (151 words) - 12:43, 28 October 2018
*[[Opinion Wiki]]
2 KB (225 words) - 17:01, 6 February 2005
...nd propaganda useless. Wiki can cope with all the complexities of multiple opinion systems and will lead to more transparency and new decision processes anywa
2 KB (273 words) - 17:25, 2 July 2004
...ne vote when meeting is called to make decisions ([[split]], [[merge]]r, [[opinion change]], [[nullify]]ing) of the campaign
...e the introduction of Campaign management by Wiki and the included idea of Opinion Wiki accepting and handling votes this scheme is a little broken
5 KB (706 words) - 21:33, 27 September 2006
...Wiki]] or [[Publish Wiki]] and certainly can't determine "what is just an Opinion" on his or her own
2 KB (382 words) - 14:42, 29 July 2004
...w before horde(s) of [[trolls]] edited. Or see [[best cases]] for how the opinion wiki should enable the whole project.''
...ll at all - hence we use '''opinion''' for now, and maybe consider that '''opinion''' can be seen as '''research''' by those who really believe in the premise
11 KB (1,748 words) - 16:51, 5 August 2004
...other may be infidel is they stops looking for your advice or perhaps your opinion about major decisions inside their lives. <br><br>Are they able for getting
3 KB (573 words) - 10:14, 26 July 2016
...may bring up a certain fact - that can be balanced by bringing in counter-opinion, not by psychiatry or slandering early authors
2 KB (400 words) - 21:30, 21 May 2004
...ouch with potential pitfalls in investments by using aggregate data from [[Opinion Wiki]] thus stay safe of investing in possibly destructive business venture
2 KB (308 words) - 21:34, 1 March 2004
...w as the R&D Wiki, where we are planning operation of [[Research Wiki]], [[Opinion Wiki]] and [[Publish Wiki]](s)
...greements about various [[ISMs]]. Also opposition for re-introduction of [[Opinion Wiki]] into the total plan of how to make this workable in the real world i
8 KB (1,220 words) - 19:17, 23 April 2012
...ke''' (No distinct [[Signal Wiki]]/[[Research Wiki]] or [[Content Wiki]]/[[Opinion Wiki]] or [[Research Wiki]]/[[Publish Wiki]] distinction.) [[How many wikis
3 KB (474 words) - 14:46, 24 January 2005
...i_modifications Modifications required/helpful in running Content Wiki and Opinion Wiki]
2 KB (302 words) - 18:57, 23 July 2013
...m]] must be able to do an '''[[XML]] dump''' of the [[Content Wiki]] and [[Opinion Wiki]] at any time, if the material in them is [[GFDL]]:
1 KB (245 words) - 10:02, 16 August 2012
...ects where [[faction]]s do not agree), which go to [[Research Wiki]] aka [[Opinion Wiki]] where further research is performed. Whatever it is called, this co
...h will be stored when it gets built. Facts require more discipline than [[opinion wiki]] comments. When we say "fact" we mean [[instructional capital]] that
6 KB (977 words) - 15:53, 28 August 2004
...cts between users''' must take limited cognizance of their status on the [[Opinion Wiki]] or [[Content Wiki]]. ''These are guidelines for resolving conflicts
3 KB (519 words) - 18:57, 11 February 2004