'''Opinion change is a [[feature]] of an [[campaign]]'''
...ges. If a certain proportion of the [[campaigner]]s call for a [[vote]] on opinion change such a vote will be arranged and as a result a "fierce" call for [[b
571 bytes (98 words) - 00:39, 2 June 2003
...sest anyone has come so far. Accordingly we might ask [[Fred Bauder]] his opinion on this question:
...n a [[Publish Wiki]] will always contain a lot of what some people call "[[opinion]]".
750 bytes (121 words) - 16:55, 5 August 2004
don't have time to form a full opinion on an issue, you could do worse
than looking at RF's opinion and voting exactly opposite them. -Snowspinner[http://mail.wikipedia.org/pi
972 bytes (163 words) - 19:08, 26 June 2004
#REDIRECT [[Opinion Wiki]]
26 bytes (3 words) - 21:27, 18 October 2003
This is a better name for the [[Opinion Wiki]] discussion. Here's why [[trolls]] think so:
...sted than'' that of the "[[Content Wiki]]". If so, who needs it? Unless "Opinion" is just "talk:" applied to "Content"...
4 KB (617 words) - 01:54, 21 May 2004
*[[Opinion Wiki]]
**[[Opinion change]]
558 bytes (81 words) - 13:42, 12 April 2021
...limited or "bugged up" to make it useless. There is no incentive, (in the opinion of 142.177.X.X) once GetWiki dies, for MediaWiki's developers (some of whom
...i just to have a hedge against the [[sysop power structure]], which in the opinion of 142.177.X.X controls Mediawiki code.
3 KB (480 words) - 13:44, 29 September 2004
...Eye view]] in disguise, and point to the nonsense idea that "research and opinion can be differentiated objectively" as an example of it polluting [[Consumer
446 bytes (71 words) - 17:20, 30 June 2004
It's not clear who has worse no-body-expressing-opinion problems, Metaweb or Consumerium, but, whichever does, should set the stand
397 bytes (64 words) - 17:00, 17 October 2003
...by marginalizing critiques of Wikipedia as if they were just one person's opinion:
...t these things done also by the same people in your [[Content Wiki]] and [[Opinion Wiki]], you will have to clearly state what's wrong with these policies, an
2 KB (268 words) - 19:28, 13 April 2004
'''The [[Consumerium]] Exchange''' is where people can voice their opinion on which [[disputed article]] or [[campaign]] is closest to the [[truth]] a
...combined measurement for different opinions, which determines the default opinion shown to the [[consumer]] on each issue.
4 KB (656 words) - 01:16, 25 June 2004
'''Funded troll'''s are paid to change opinions in the [[Opinion Wiki]] or alter the way that the project works in ways that favour those wh
...s seems really unlikely if [[marketing]] starts to depend heavily on the [[Opinion Wiki]] here or other traits of [[Consumerium:Itself]].
2 KB (247 words) - 11:36, 11 July 2005
will be [[opinion wiki]] where strict syntax will be
[[opinion wiki]]. [[publish wiki]] will import from
3 KB (400 words) - 18:38, 24 July 2004
...oduction of [[Campaign]] management by [[Wiki]] and the included idea of [[Opinion Wiki]] accepting and handling votes this scheme is a little broken
...Research Wiki]] and [[Signal Wiki]] to somehow overthrow the old plan of [[Opinion Wiki]] and [[Content Wiki]] it is unclear what goes where and how [[Wiki ma
2 KB (345 words) - 03:11, 28 March 2004
...ed bank. Didn't you read this is Juxo's day off so he's not formulating an opinion today?
352 bytes (54 words) - 13:43, 18 April 2004
Suppose two wikis, I'll call them [[Opinion Wiki]] and [[Content Wiki]] as working titles.
...ter security (HTTPS?) for [[Content Wiki]] without performance losses in [[Opinion Wiki]]
3 KB (433 words) - 19:34, 24 July 2018
...together a [[Unified wiki]] approach that unifies the [[Content Wiki]] + [[Opinion Wiki]] (or [[Research Wiki]] + [[Publish Wiki]]) under one wiki. This is no
550 bytes (88 words) - 14:51, 21 June 2005
...tly we are mostly focusing on [[campaign]] management [[wiki]] style in [[Opinion Wiki]], from whereon information will be aggregated to provide composite in
479 bytes (70 words) - 05:33, 16 October 2003
...e ever get around to such a decision: in general, the difference between "opinion" and "research" is who you trust, i.e. which [[faction]], and if you have a
...oregion]]) or a piece of [[advertising]] which is clearly promotional. An opinion starts as the lowest-credibility form of research and those who provide it
6 KB (1,000 words) - 18:24, 20 September 2004
*[[Opinion Wiki]] - Where the campaigning is managed
701 bytes (108 words) - 20:36, 15 October 2003
...e DB of some 350 big companies with well researched information and public opinion
632 bytes (94 words) - 18:39, 21 September 2004
'''A Campaigner is someone who is participating in a [[Campaign]] in the [[Opinion Wiki]] by:'''
906 bytes (151 words) - 16:24, 4 November 2004
...ser]] vs. [[Verified User]]. ''Groups and VirtualGroups as described in [[Opinion Wiki]] '''may''' be implemented here, mostly likely as [[faction]]s and [[t
<small>'''Publish Wiki''' will take on the role of [[Opinion Wiki]], which was an ad-hoc development purpose name for discovering how [[
3 KB (396 words) - 18:48, 27 August 2005
...ganization]] will keep a close eye on sysops in the [[content wiki]] and [[opinion wiki]], and will govern them and give them more or less power depending sol
905 bytes (140 words) - 01:04, 8 September 2004
=== Content vs. opinion - where is neutrality possible? desirable? ===
...is disputed in the content wiki? Removing isolating disputed claims to [[Opinion Wiki]] circles is not enough.
4 KB (618 words) - 17:38, 2 July 2004
"Scenarios should include extremes and those that contradict popular opinion" - Algorithmics Inc., probably the world's most advanced scenario analysis
864 bytes (130 words) - 16:52, 25 November 2003
...ho dispute the ability of anyone to tell "sympathetic" from "critical" or "opinion" from "research", would prefer that this article be from a very critical PO
...t]]s to prevail in [[Publish Wiki]] as long as there is such a thing as "[[Opinion Wiki]]" which requires vandalism ([[sysop vandalism|someone deciding things
5 KB (749 words) - 12:00, 23 September 2004
...is, rather than rely on [[Consumerium researchers]] exclusively for their opinion of say which [[standard label]]s were about to become important, it would b
1 KB (184 words) - 16:15, 24 November 2003
...ther material will be spun off into [[Research Wiki]], formerly known as [[Opinion Wiki]], which will be a [[large public wiki]] with slightly better [[govern
...because before the distinction between [[Content Wiki]] (for facts) and [[Opinion Wiki]] (for subjective views and campaigns based on subjective criteria) wa
5 KB (793 words) - 19:34, 22 March 2004
...specify how any [[improvement]] that is generated in the [[R&D wiki]] or [[opinion wiki]] or [[Consumerium maintenance]] etc. is to be documented, published,
1 KB (173 words) - 20:59, 24 November 2003
...g [[product]]s within a [[product group]] by their composite rating from [[Opinion Wiki]] might be a partial solution. Perhaps [[Campaign]]s could have other
...onmental friendliness and it can maybe done by utilizing composites from [[Opinion Wiki]]
3 KB (459 words) - 04:04, 4 December 2003
:Ummm. No, not in my humble opinion. I've been thinking about the [[score|score scale]] for a long time and I'v
...any country, but rather trust the usual methods ie. [[campaigns]] in the [[Opinion Wiki]] to do that, but I see your motivation for writing this article and '
3 KB (597 words) - 15:19, 16 October 2003
...se if they found information they had placed in a [[content wiki]] or an [[opinion wiki]] was being used in ways that was detrimental to their business or rep
1 KB (169 words) - 17:46, 22 November 2003
*[[faction]]s - representing differences of opinion within the system itself
1 KB (198 words) - 19:10, 9 April 2004
...the [[company]] in question and it's executives via [[Content Wiki]] and [[Opinion Wiki]].
545 bytes (80 words) - 11:50, 14 July 2012
Instead, Surowiecki's "Wise crowds" are described as having (1) diversity of opinion; (2) independence of members from one another; (3) decentralization; and (4
1 KB (225 words) - 21:58, 18 July 2004
...d. ''See [[Talk:Development_Wiki]] for debate on the naming scheme, and [[Opinion Wiki]] for how it might work.''
<small>This bears similarity to [[Opinion Wiki]], which is now mostly planned to be implemented in the [[Signal Wiki]
2 KB (320 words) - 15:58, 24 April 2012
...gh a [[glossary]] defined by a [[faction]] through its own subset of the [[opinion wiki]]. Rules for this are not the same as those of the [[content wiki]].
1 KB (247 words) - 08:08, 24 November 2003
:"I really want a separate Opinion Wiki simply because we can aggregate data (votes on campaigns etc.) via SQL
1 KB (229 words) - 16:05, 26 June 2004
merits of, the [[product]]. Probably filtered from [[opinion wiki]].
1 KB (243 words) - 05:31, 25 October 2003
...ate page|typical]] [[Research Wiki]] page of [[fact]]s, [[allegation]]s, [[opinion]]s, and [[claim]]s, all in a single organized [[Consumerium: intermediate p
...ial elements that allow you to [[vote]] and do other things to make your [[opinion]] heard
4 KB (533 words) - 14:37, 9 September 2004
::[[WikiVote]] - a type of vote cast for a [[campaign]] in [[Opinion Wiki]]. Also other types of votes have been proposed see [[Voting]] or [[Vo
*[[Opinion Wiki]]/[[Research Wiki]] - two names for the same thing, though some concep
4 KB (547 words) - 14:22, 14 May 2005
...must make this choice and put "non-factual statements" into a separate '''Opinion Wiki''' while the "approved facts" are respected in the [[Research Wiki]] w
1 KB (244 words) - 01:37, 6 August 2004
...make [[features|information]], both [[Content Wiki|objective facts]] and [[Opinion Wiki|subjective opinions]] locally and globally available to you. Ease of u
1 KB (228 words) - 12:02, 18 March 2004
...will result. That GodKing is not a lawyer, however, so this belief in his opinion is only [[groupthink]], and probably quite dangerous.
2 KB (249 words) - 22:15, 18 June 2004
*Active in [[Content Wiki]] or [[Opinion Wiki]]?
===[[Opinion Wiki]] evaluation preferences===
4 KB (675 words) - 17:11, 2 December 2003
...'' about something or '''facts''' about someones '''support''' for some '''opinion'''
Now the strict multilevel security measures described in [[Opinion Wiki]] will have to be played down to make [[Signal Wiki]] operation more f
6 KB (1,000 words) - 20:15, 14 March 2004
....com/205/the-best-forex-robot-in-the-world-for-big-profits/>forex auto</a> Opinion poll, quantities matured another 41% among '07 as well as 08.<><>|]
2 KB (216 words) - 15:43, 18 June 2010
*those who contribute to the [[opinion wiki]]
1 KB (219 words) - 21:02, 25 November 2003
...llenge biases, which just lets them be summed up to become a sort of group opinion, e.g. as in an [[echo chamber]].
2 KB (303 words) - 13:50, 4 March 2004