Search results
Page title matches
- The GodKing is the owner of the site, or its administrator, or any [[sysop]] with ultim ...ssive and limits the quality of participation, since no one wiser than the GodKing will be heeded in its decisions.3 KB (549 words) - 15:47, 24 January 2005
Page text matches
- #REDIRECT [[GodKing]]21 bytes (2 words) - 22:14, 4 June 2004
- The GodKing is the owner of the site, or its administrator, or any [[sysop]] with ultim ...ssive and limits the quality of participation, since no one wiser than the GodKing will be heeded in its decisions.3 KB (549 words) - 15:47, 24 January 2005
- A [[sysop power structure]] with a [[GodKing]] is a good example of this.258 bytes (39 words) - 07:01, 30 March 2004
- ...] which is not [[independent board|independent]], and continue to act as [[GodKing]], while making the others take the heat for stupid decisions.364 bytes (61 words) - 19:54, 17 June 2004
- ...ing any action or making commitments or promises. It is the opposite of [[GodKing]] rule and usually relies on means of [[consensus decision making]].307 bytes (49 words) - 16:11, 26 June 2004
- ''God Save The GodKing'' (sarcastic)561 bytes (88 words) - 06:56, 11 June 2004
- ...the following are caretakers of the Wikipedia project and often defy the [[GodKing]] and other [[usurper]]s to try to keep it "on track" as an encyclopedia: ...y rational fear that some sysops agree with the caretakers more than the [[GodKing]].2 KB (264 words) - 14:45, 14 January 2004
- ...or_antisocial_editors the proposed Wikipedia policy] but without special [[GodKing]] status reserved - as it is in that policy.435 bytes (66 words) - 20:45, 26 January 2005
- ...ipedia, which permits [[outing]] without consequence, and insists on one [[GodKing]] being informed of all details of all decisions, and begging to Him for an542 bytes (84 words) - 03:23, 22 December 2003
- ...at day) they actually mean "we can exclude this without angering our great GodKing." That is ''all'' they mean, that is, there is no possible objective defin2 KB (317 words) - 17:23, 30 June 2004
- ...as [[driven off by trolls|driving off advocates of unfair systems]] and [[GodKing]]s and such.458 bytes (70 words) - 21:26, 1 June 2004
- The "'''usual happy NPOV talk'''" according to [[Jimbo Wales]], [[GodKing]] of [[Wikimedia]], [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2004-606 bytes (92 words) - 20:56, 16 June 2004
- 2. fascism as a [[sysop power structure]] and perhaps [[GodKing]] take root - some [[sysop vigilantiism]] mostly dealt with informally; so ...ding of [[why wiki works]]; [[usurper]]s have managed to get close to the GodKing personally, and use his approval as a mask to push their own agendas - labe3 KB (474 words) - 20:20, 29 May 2005
- ...ically, and none of this is characteristic of a little tin god sysop, or a GodKing.2 KB (312 words) - 22:13, 4 June 2004
- ...Jimbo") is the co-founder of [[Wikimedia]]. He is sometimes known as the [[Godking]] of wikipedia, or the benevolent dictator. There has been some controversy562 bytes (82 words) - 11:14, 2 October 2004
- *that [[Jim Wales]] is a [[GodKing]] or can be referred to same as if that were harmless829 bytes (132 words) - 22:41, 28 August 2005
- The term was actually coined by Wikipedia's [[GodKing]], "Jimbo" Wales.804 bytes (116 words) - 03:02, 29 May 2004
- ...ot put any one source at the centre of the universe, and strongly oppose [[GodKing]]s on all wikis. This is just one more issue in [[wiki governance]].809 bytes (120 words) - 07:51, 17 June 2004
- '''Ethics''' is whatever a [[GodKing]] says, as interpreted by a [[priestly hierarchy]]. This is [[neutral poin880 bytes (136 words) - 00:07, 10 August 2004
- ...ght be [[driven off by trolls]] if their positions, e.g. pro-Nazi or pro-[[GodKing]], are very unpopular998 bytes (148 words) - 07:34, 8 June 2004
- ...regarding [[Simple English]] and the degree to which Wikipedia abandons [[GodKing]]s to become [[troll-friendly]]. This seems unlikely in the near future. ...ocess deletion at SEW or indeed any [[Wikimedia]] project ruled by their [[GodKing]].3 KB (490 words) - 23:20, 7 January 2004
- ...[bootstrap]] would prove that it is quite possible to function without a [[GodKing]] or even a [[representative democracy]] model, though some [[sysop power s1 KB (186 words) - 21:50, 14 August 2004
- ...ns as how to deal with the [[Red China block]], which the still-reigning [[GodKing]] chooses to deal with unilaterally via the "[[usual happy NPOV talk]]". '1 KB (167 words) - 15:23, 17 June 2004
- ...the projects they have been involved in into [[enemy projects]] or done [[GodKing]] worship without question (almost the same thing, not quite). These shoul ...all the [[GFDL text corpus]] so we can work with it without MySQL, perl, [[GodKing]]s, or dreaded "Wikipedians". They may even beat [[Metaweb]] to the punch,3 KB (585 words) - 19:04, 8 February 2004
- ...d strongly frowned upon even when it is done under the direct order of a [[GodKing]]. It makes it obvious that there is a [[power structure]] that is quite d1 KB (194 words) - 21:57, 16 January 2004
- ...have a [[Number of the Beast]] branded on them to buy or sell. Like the [[GodKing|Roman emperors of old]], he would impose horrible martyrdoms on surviving C1 KB (194 words) - 23:45, 31 May 2004
- ...trust me" situation that is not necessarily better than just trusting a [[GodKing]] to make all the decisions - at least one ''knows'' one is doing that!1 KB (220 words) - 16:10, 26 June 2004
- ...Lowest Troll''' with a [[GodKing]]. However, they are clearly not, as the GodKing claims moral superiority when he exercises his technological superiority or4 KB (634 words) - 19:28, 5 March 2004
- ...in English from now on! I must understand! I will understand! I am the GodKing! YEEaarraaggh!)4 KB (591 words) - 05:42, 15 March 2004
- ...m]] - the group is the [[sysop power structure]] - see [[Wikimedia]] and [[GodKing]] and [[undelete page]] for issues1 KB (210 words) - 15:51, 24 January 2005
- Pi back rightfully to 3.1 as has been declared rightful by our GodKing.2 KB (273 words) - 18:42, 24 July 2004
- ...t also refers to the final legal and political confrontation between the [[GodKing]]s and the [[trolls]] on all [[GFDL corpus access provider]]s, and the remo889 bytes (140 words) - 18:52, 28 June 2004
- Some [[large public wiki]]s have a single [[GodKing]] to declare what constitute '''false''' or '''unsubstantiated'''. This pe2 KB (263 words) - 09:52, 10 September 2004
- ...e to the "[[neutral point of view]]". Where a [[priestly hierarchy]] or [[GodKing]] rules, this is wholly appropriate.2 KB (253 words) - 19:12, 5 July 2004
- *No [[GodKing]].2 KB (313 words) - 18:56, 17 February 2004
- ...a [[cabal]], [[clique]] or [[sysop power structure]] ruled by same or by [[GodKing]], who will ensure that the text does not return, valid or not. This is an2 KB (342 words) - 01:11, 15 March 2004
- ...a [[sysop power structure]] accountable only to themselves, consort with [[GodKing]]s, or be cowed by [[libel chill]] or the invention of [[spun threat]]s for1 KB (194 words) - 10:23, 23 October 2012
- ...view]]) is the view of the [[sysop power structure]] and (if applicable) [[GodKing]].2 KB (352 words) - 04:06, 6 July 2004
- ...special about the [[Sysop Vandal point of view]] and no reason to let a [[GodKing]] or [[priestly hierarchy]] determine the discourse on any wiki.2 KB (297 words) - 22:08, 31 August 2004
- ...pressure]] and [[class-hatred]]." Accordingly once authority (such as a [[GodKing]] is identified, all forms of hate and abuse that are not specifically prev ...o any that elevates or seems to worship the final-resort sysop (the term [[GodKing]], like "[[politically correct]]", seems to provide a kind of authority to5 KB (865 words) - 17:40, 6 September 2004
- ...estly and lets any contributor, including [[trolls]], help it do so, the [[GodKing]]s of such projects rightfully consider us a threat to their power, and att3 KB (432 words) - 08:14, 26 September 2004
- ...rce specifically to enable [[moral purchasing]], which means only what the GodKing and his sysops say it means.3 KB (547 words) - 11:47, 28 October 2018
- *[[God's Eye View]] of course, which leads inexorably to worship of a [[GodKing]]2 KB (369 words) - 00:27, 12 August 2004
- ...espected by the [[sysop power structure]], i.e. a personal friend of the [[GodKing]]) who is on a more or less continuous [[witch-hunt]].3 KB (416 words) - 20:57, 7 January 2004
- ...and should be employed only for [[inquisitor]]s and the more persistent [[GodKing]] minions - those who literally can't seem to comprehend any other way to d2 KB (398 words) - 21:06, 7 January 2004
- ...ory actions enforced by [[w:fiat]], e.g. sysop status, Militia approval, [[GodKing]] [[w:monarchy]], or whatever.2 KB (395 words) - 18:27, 28 June 2004
- ...you should do little or nothing until the [[power structure]] (or just a [[GodKing]]) is offended. This conserves energy and avoids revealing sensitivities.3 KB (404 words) - 18:11, 20 February 2004
- 3. For purposes of knuckling under to [[libel chill]] by [[GodKing]]s and so on:3 KB (438 words) - 16:58, 9 September 2004
- ...s or trustworthiness. This is literally self-worship, unsurprising in a [[GodKing]].3 KB (444 words) - 17:38, 21 June 2004
- ...each other's orders, e.g. the [[priestly hierarchy]] that surrounds the [[GodKing]] preaching [[Wikimedia corruption]] and [[systemic bias]] as a [[Good Thin3 KB (429 words) - 15:55, 5 September 2004
- ...]] or [[due process]] system can overcome it. For instance, status of a [[GodKing]] as the sole arbiter of disputes, reliance on [[technological escalation]]3 KB (515 words) - 22:01, 7 May 2004
- ...heological power structure considerably. It is no accident that the term [[GodKing]] is used to describe the user of last resort. ...r own they tend to be [[little tin god]]s - each hoping to grow up to be [[GodKing]]. This shouldn't be encouraged. Nor should a clique of [[usurper]]s doin10 KB (1,554 words) - 15:53, 3 June 2005
- ...ty to a particular faction or one of the "four gs" [[golf]], [[gold]], a [[GodKing]] or [[Global warming promotion society]]2 KB (332 words) - 20:14, 16 July 2012
- ...things which are actually [[political dispute]]s. Wikipedia is run by a [[GodKing]] who reserves to himself the right to resolve or even redefine any politic4 KB (618 words) - 17:38, 2 July 2004
- ...that the [[sysop power structure]] is so irresponsible that it, and its [[GodKing]], must either change, or lose the best contributors with the highest integ4 KB (618 words) - 21:56, 7 January 2004
- ...]] and replacing it with a more accountable structure with no history of [[GodKing]]s nor [[priestly hierarchy]] nor [[command hierarchy]]. ''See the analysi ...h, since the guiltiest parties actually can't read those languages. The [[GodKing]], Jim Wales, can't read or write any language other than English. This is14 KB (2,286 words) - 14:00, 3 January 2005
- ...:Wikipedia Governance]] for debate on one-man rule over there. See also [[GodKing]].''4 KB (618 words) - 23:45, 25 January 2005
- [[GodKing]] usurpation is simply standing by to let others do these things, and quiet4 KB (625 words) - 00:57, 8 July 2005
- ...h, since the guiltiest parties actually can't read those languages. The [[GodKing]], Jim Wales, can't read or write any language other than English. This is ...resolves their internal contradictions (multi-language project run by a [[GodKing]] who speaks and reads only English, claims of neutrality with no outreach14 KB (2,155 words) - 21:35, 9 September 2004
- ...the "grey" way to settle such debates. The latter leads to trust in one [[GodKing]]. The former may lead to a greater role for [[trolls]]. There are reason4 KB (676 words) - 04:07, 10 September 2004
- ...- this term is reserved for very despised [[trolls]] who drive off even [[GodKing]]s and discredit [[ontologist]]s, which is later seen to be a Good Thing.4 KB (664 words) - 00:29, 8 September 2004
- ...ts officers, such decisions are almost always either "sysop instinct" or [[GodKing]] choices.4 KB (722 words) - 15:54, 24 January 2005
- ...structure]] to make it difficult for those who disagree with it, or the [[GodKing]] to communicate even the most [[essential projects|essential concepts]] to3 KB (435 words) - 13:40, 12 April 2021
- ...onsibility]] rather than trust in any god-like authority figures, e.g. a [[GodKing]]. [[Vile mailing list]]s and other [[echo chamber]] behaviour like [[spun4 KB (614 words) - 19:58, 21 June 2005
- ...e'' than that hopefully. ''Nothing less complex is known to work except [[GodKing]] dictatorship, and that usually has bad real world results.''5 KB (726 words) - 17:50, 2 September 2004
- ...entative democracy]] to augment or replace the [[Pointy Haired Boss]] or [[GodKing]] who might still exist for legal reasons - to answer to [[Consumerium Gove3 KB (443 words) - 13:58, 12 April 2021
- ...ons, e.g. [[Wikipedia Red Faction]] resistance against [[Wikimedia]] and [[GodKing]]. Some of these advocate a more formal [[faction]] system to organize [[t4 KB (702 words) - 11:49, 11 July 2005
- :"A wiki is by contrast troll-hostile and ruled by a GodKing if "deliberately disrupting work... in order to foster change, etc." can be ...other might call "hosts". A bad sysop is what "soft security" would call a GodKing.14 KB (2,240 words) - 12:33, 23 September 2004
- ...b]] at [[Wikipedia]]. This will not surprise anyone familiar with their [[GodKing]] or [[sysop power structure]], which lacks very considerably in these virt5 KB (708 words) - 18:20, 7 September 2004
- ...[[wiki management]] seem to be starting some based on the principles of [[GodKing]] control, [[sysop power structure]], [[sysop vigilantiism]] and [[sysop va5 KB (825 words) - 18:52, 21 September 2004
- ...odel]]s have a more centralized model based on some degree of trust in a [[GodKing]], or perhaps measurable [[distrust]] levels. Our trust model should have5 KB (813 words) - 20:28, 30 August 2004
- ...t for [[trolls]] and others excluded for various reasons. ''Contact the [[GodKing]] for advice on these criteria. Many [[wiki management]] [[Wikipedia as a ...hor displeases Him. [[Trolling]] is often interpreted as an attack on the GodKing's divinity.19 KB (2,807 words) - 16:48, 9 September 2004
- ...ped nation]]s, which evolve towards multi-party democracy, and away from [[GodKing]] rule.6 KB (893 words) - 10:57, 12 October 2004
- The 'once and for all' decision structure propagated by [[GodKing]]s such as and Wikipedia are both anti-political and anti-democratic in nat7 KB (1,106 words) - 08:23, 7 January 2004
- ...d demonstrates contempt for users. The ultimate expression of this is a [[GodKing]] who claims that his "virtual community" and its needs are more important5 KB (786 words) - 10:14, 16 September 2021
- A wiki is by contrast troll-hostile and ruled by a [[GodKing]] if "deliberately6 KB (987 words) - 00:55, 3 March 2020
- as an [[GodKing|awe-inspiring founder]]. Certain [[sycophant]]s skew10 KB (1,627 words) - 07:36, 13 July 2010
- ::No one can run for a [[GodKing]]'s job, so it's necessary to discredit him. If the job is politically imp13 KB (2,283 words) - 14:34, 15 August 2004
- ...er vigilantiism]], [[Sysopism]], [[Sysops]], [[Sysop power structure]]s, [[GodKing]] reliant wiki culture, [[Ad hominem delete]],8 KB (1,220 words) - 19:17, 23 April 2012
- ...res (!), even on a sitewide basis, according to directives by Jimbo] the [[GodKing]] of Wikimedia and Bomis18 KB (2,874 words) - 15:46, 28 September 2004