Recyclopedia: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    No edit summary
     
    m (tyop)
     
    (7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
    Line 1: Line 1:
    '''Recyclopedia''' (at [http://www.recyclopedia.info recyclopedia.info] is probably the most closely aligned [[essential projects|encyclopedia project]] using the [[wikitext standard]] pioneered by [[mediawiki]] and now better implemented in [[GetWiki]].  It appears to be an aspect of the [[Wikinfo]] project.
    '''Recyclopedia does not exist any more'''


    We might consider these to be the best prototype yet of the future [[Development Wiki]];  It is certainly going to attract like-minded people.  The odds of a typical [[Recyclopedia contributor]] becoming a [[Consumerium contributor]] are likely much higher than the odds of a [[Wikipedia]], [[Metaweb]] or [[Disinfopedia]] contributor doing so.  It seems that it is devoted to presenting a negotiated [[consensus]] between [[Reds]] and [[Greens]] and various [[anarchist]] views.
    '''Recyclopedia''' (at [http://www.recyclopedia.info recyclopedia.info]) is probably the most closely aligned [[essential projects|encyclopedia project]] using the [[wikitext standard]] pioneered by [[mediawiki]] and now better implemented in [[GetWiki]].  It appears to be an aspect of the [[Wikinfo]] project.


    ''Accordingly, if a lot of these users come over we may need to recruit some [[Blues]] or [[Pinks]] to balance these rather hardcore views.  One problem at a time.''
    We might consider these to be the best prototype yet of the future [[Development Wiki]];  It is certainly going to attract like-minded people. 
     
    The odds of a typical [[Recyclopedia contributor]] becoming a [[Consumerium contributor]] are likely much higher than the odds of a [[Wikipedia]], [[Metaweb]] or [[Disinfopedia]] contributor doing so.  It seems that it is devoted to presenting a negotiated [[consensus]] between [[Reds]] and [[Greens]] and various [[anarchist]] views.  ''Accordingly, if a lot of these users come over we may need to recruit some [[Blues]] or [[Pinks]] to balance these rather hardcore views.  One problem at a time.''
     
    ''See some proposed [http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Talk:Recyclopedia:Feature Recyclopedia features] to see if they converge with our needs here, and should perhaps be in [[GetWiki]] for their use and ours.''
     
    ''See also [http://www.recyclopedia.info/wiki/?title=User:ThomasKalka ThomasKalka's suggestion] that http://coforum.de become the German Recyclopedia - de.recyclopedia.info and coforum.de would then be synonyms.  Can our [[Lowest Troll]] help set up fi.recyclopedia.info as well?''
     
    [[Category:Projects that no longer exist]]

    Latest revision as of 12:18, 24 April 2012

    Recyclopedia does not exist any more

    Recyclopedia (at recyclopedia.info) is probably the most closely aligned encyclopedia project using the wikitext standard pioneered by mediawiki and now better implemented in GetWiki. It appears to be an aspect of the Wikinfo project.

    We might consider these to be the best prototype yet of the future Development Wiki; It is certainly going to attract like-minded people.

    The odds of a typical Recyclopedia contributor becoming a Consumerium contributor are likely much higher than the odds of a Wikipedia, Metaweb or Disinfopedia contributor doing so. It seems that it is devoted to presenting a negotiated consensus between Reds and Greens and various anarchist views. Accordingly, if a lot of these users come over we may need to recruit some Blues or Pinks to balance these rather hardcore views. One problem at a time.

    See some proposed Recyclopedia features to see if they converge with our needs here, and should perhaps be in GetWiki for their use and ours.

    See also ThomasKalka's suggestion that http://coforum.de become the German Recyclopedia - de.recyclopedia.info and coforum.de would then be synonyms. Can our Lowest Troll help set up fi.recyclopedia.info as well?