Search results

Page title matches

  • '''Three Parties Rule''' states that a situation where there are two parties with conflicting interests should be resolved by including a neutral third ...nship and B=E=C relationship is supposed to be good enough even for the to parties to trust their bodies to it! This is what we call [[law]].
    2 KB (321 words) - 23:16, 26 April 2003
  • ...tely science is a culture too, and nothing is completely objective. Green Parties worldwide have a [[w:Global Greens Charter]] that emphasizes the following
    868 bytes (125 words) - 07:06, 11 June 2004

Page text matches

  • ...owing consumers to compare prices, or quieting religious critics. Powerful parties should not be permitted to misuse copyright as a tool for limiting bad pres
    1 KB (165 words) - 16:25, 25 November 2003
  • ...tiple parties all over the world, e.g. the [[Greens]] which have very many parties.
    400 bytes (62 words) - 17:56, 5 March 2004
  • '''Three Parties Rule''' states that a situation where there are two parties with conflicting interests should be resolved by including a neutral third ...nship and B=E=C relationship is supposed to be good enough even for the to parties to trust their bodies to it! This is what we call [[law]].
    2 KB (321 words) - 23:16, 26 April 2003
  • ...iterally no democratic political structures in the real world without such parties. They seem to be absolutely necessary to agree on [[factionally defined te
    704 bytes (109 words) - 04:14, 22 December 2003
  • ...tely science is a culture too, and nothing is completely objective. Green Parties worldwide have a [[w:Global Greens Charter]] that emphasizes the following
    868 bytes (125 words) - 07:06, 11 June 2004
  • - removal of parties who habitually engage in this behaviour, e.g. [[Erik Moeller]], [[Daniel Ma - apologies from parties who have sometimes engaged in unaccountable behaviours, e.g. [[outing]], su
    2 KB (373 words) - 20:47, 7 September 2004
  • ...usable by everyone in 20 years. This is at least time to get some [[Green Parties]] elected or build [[Greenpeace]] up into a sort of global enforcer, but it
    540 bytes (90 words) - 23:19, 24 November 2003
  • A '''consortium''' is a group of companies or parties that agree to cooperate in a way favourable to themselves and their own [[c
    515 bytes (80 words) - 20:59, 24 November 2003
  • ...sentative democracy''' uses [[faction]] conflict, i.e. between [[political parties]], to simulate actual warfare that would otherwise occur between those fact
    454 bytes (66 words) - 16:01, 3 September 2004
  • ...nd also as a fallback default in case that none of the trusted auditors or parties indicated to be trustworthy by the trusted auditors have signed an article.
    498 bytes (85 words) - 20:52, 1 December 2003
  • #Get some wise people to lay down [[instructional capital]] that all parties can accept, that defines on [[what ground]]s [[each type of information]] i ...Historical]] [[Data]] without being encumbered by the work and provide all parties with suitable [[UI]] for their role. Choose [[licenses]] for each of these
    2 KB (274 words) - 21:04, 25 July 2003
  • ...excuse several rather extreme [[IP block]]s. The influence of those three parties (all in a [[conflict of interest]] due to their participation in [[edit war ...dents like this render [[due process]] ultimately ineffective by rendering parties hostile to it, and uninterested in further debate about such claims - which
    3 KB (449 words) - 20:40, 3 July 2004
  • ...of people claims a similar harm has been done to them by the same party or parties. For example: ...o steps at all to prevent use of names of uninvolved or involutarily named parties ("[[outing]]") in connection with [[false and unsubstantiated claims]] rega
    2 KB (348 words) - 17:43, 9 September 2004
  • ...ached, and encourage more casual use of names and damage to reputations of parties otherwise uninvolved. There is probably no clearer basis for a [[libel sui
    3 KB (435 words) - 23:02, 9 September 2004
  • ...accusations of corruption be they aimed at [[Consumerium:Itself]] or other parties.
    815 bytes (118 words) - 15:19, 9 September 2004
  • ...[[political party]] structures ([[ideology]] does not motivate most ruling parties much). Very often there is tension between these interests, and the [[econ
    1 KB (165 words) - 19:08, 25 November 2003
  • ...accused/crediting with having authored a rather vast literature by various parties, but this in an "article" which contains obvious factual errors), and Islam ...n bias in the terms it uses. Subsequently entire IP ranges where numerous parties had edited articles inherently hostile to the Bush administration, e.g. [[w
    4 KB (599 words) - 19:22, 19 August 2004
  • ...tism]]) or it has negative consequences for [[human health]]. The [[Green Parties]] put '''ecological wisdom''' first on a list of [[six principles]].
    1 KB (161 words) - 18:37, 25 November 2003
  • * [[Three Parties Rule]]
    1 KB (120 words) - 22:51, 6 November 2003
  • ...are more willing to work in [[minority government]] than almost any other parties.
    3 KB (519 words) - 21:47, 24 November 2003
  • ...1, but when you see more than one or two reverts, WITHOUT third and fourth parties sharing the burden of reverting, you KNOW this is not the case, and that it
    2 KB (280 words) - 13:55, 4 March 2004
  • Apparently such licenses are used within [[Green Parties]] and some clauses of this nature exist in some contracts, e.g. [[WarFTP]]'
    1 KB (193 words) - 10:03, 24 November 2003
  • ...t]]s, each sprint producing an executable. Between sprints, all interested parties evaluate progress and reevaluate technical and business requirements. Work
    1 KB (217 words) - 04:00, 22 February 2004
  • ...transaction]] is deemed to be agreeable and ultimately acceptable by all [[parties]]. To be considered '''fair''', a [[transaction|transactions]] must be see
    1 KB (203 words) - 18:50, 7 June 2003
  • ...[[community]], [[governance]] and even useful [[groupthink]] (factions or parties simplifying [[discourse]] on governance questions) to enhance the life of a Likewise, many parties in Consumerium, including those "targetted" by it, can benefit because:
    3 KB (481 words) - 16:09, 6 April 2024
  • ...to quickly and simply correct, to [[be bold]] in making changes - so that parties with a political motive to accuse contributors of "being vandals" don't not
    2 KB (265 words) - 22:05, 7 January 2004
  • ...e]]" in a contractual relationship, actively attempting to get one or more parties to breach a contract
    1 KB (237 words) - 03:18, 16 February 2004
  • ===Do you want to make some additional information available to other parties?=== ...e you better. Do you wish to give some information to one or more of these parties?'' '''A confirmation-challenge email will be sent to your email address if
    4 KB (675 words) - 17:11, 2 December 2003
  • ...two-party system''' develops. Formal [[faction]]s in and out of these two parties jockey for control of the [[consensus]] and the [[dissensus]] within each p
    1 KB (231 words) - 22:37, 3 March 2004
  • ...ly, due process includes and is served by an [[adversarial process]] where parties present their cases in a neutral form and stick to the facts. ''See [[142.
    2 KB (272 words) - 03:58, 16 February 2004
  • To do so the Green [[Governance Organization]] ([[Green Parties]] or [[nonprofit]] [[Consortium]] holding the patents for them) would agree
    2 KB (319 words) - 02:08, 25 November 2003
  • ...e/[[Workplace Upgrade]] Request/message - these will be distributed to all parties
    2 KB (247 words) - 21:50, 27 September 2006
  • ...m can be made to work? If so you're a pink! (OK by this definition [[Green Parties]] are pinks, use your judgement)
    2 KB (324 words) - 06:14, 15 August 2004
  • ...ance, those concepts favoured in the [[mass media]] or by ruling political parties, will almost certainly be strongly favoured in the distribution of [[sysop
    2 KB (318 words) - 20:57, 25 December 2003
  • ...al asset]]; permit energy and material savings to be invested in by third parties separately, as a different type of "savings bond", letting them share in th
    2 KB (238 words) - 04:05, 17 July 2003
  • * '''Secure''' for both parties ([[Consumer]] and [[Retailer]])
    2 KB (249 words) - 09:58, 15 October 2003
  • ...flection of the comprehensive outcome - noting the gains and losses to all parties involved, not just those investing or purchasing. Such moves have made [[m
    3 KB (406 words) - 17:08, 13 December 2003
  • ...ecology-focused NGOs like [[Greenpeace]] and [[Earth First]], and [[Green Parties]] which tend to monitor both production and consumption closely in [[develo
    2 KB (386 words) - 21:27, 20 November 2003
  • *[[Greens]] are the most politically organized, into [[Green Parties]] sharing the [[six principles]] and [[fair trade]]
    3 KB (407 words) - 21:55, 24 November 2003
  • ...under the supervision of an [[independent board]] would potentially elect parties to the following roles that require extreme judgement:
    2 KB (377 words) - 18:09, 9 September 2004
  • ...res such as lawsuits and reprisals are already being contemplated by a few parties. There are constant [[threats]], for instance, to sue Wikipedia out of exi
    3 KB (439 words) - 20:20, 25 December 2003
  • ...would be most efficient, especially if existing institutions like poltical parties and NGOs agreed to cooperate in factions matching their own politics and as
    4 KB (566 words) - 07:39, 25 June 2003
  • ...sing the maximum amount of reliable information, but would not require all parties involved to trust each other equally in [[wiki management]].
    3 KB (559 words) - 06:38, 29 February 2004
  • ...ad", but no democracy exists on Earth without multiple competing political parties, so the evidence is otherwise. One-party states tend to be stagnant and fa
    2 KB (332 words) - 20:14, 16 July 2012
  • ...each other. In democracy this means dividing into pro- and anti-ape mother parties that debate the actual policy while a pan-sapien bureaucracy implements the
    2 KB (283 words) - 14:19, 12 April 2021
  • ...above work, and prevents [[legal struggle]] which would bring in unwanted parties, e.g. lawyers, who would come to the table with "ideas", which would be bad
    4 KB (614 words) - 18:17, 1 July 2003
  • ...eem to be enough, but it isn't. A much more rigorous view of the affected parties of any transaction or edit must be there - one must know roughly the balanc
    4 KB (618 words) - 17:38, 2 July 2004
  • ...ation. Being able perhaps to re-integrate the semantic web after multiple parties have edited the different factional sections independently... all up for g
    4 KB (690 words) - 15:59, 3 June 2004
  • ...re above. This might let groups like [[Amnesty International]] or [[Green Parties]] or [[Simultaneous Policy Organization]] or [[Greenpeace]] run a part of t
    4 KB (636 words) - 01:19, 27 October 2003
  • *Third parties will be able to read our barcodes
    2 KB (346 words) - 22:20, 23 September 2020
View (previous 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)