Recyclopedia: Difference between revisions
(typo) |
(typo) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Recyclopedia''' (at [http://www.recyclopedia.info | '''Recyclopedia''' (at [http://www.recyclopedia.info recyclopedia.info]) is probably the most closely aligned [[essential projects|encyclopedia project]] using the [[wikitext standard]] pioneered by [[mediawiki]] and now better implemented in [[GetWiki]]. It appears to be an aspect of the [[Wikinfo]] project. | ||
We might consider these to be the best prototype yet of the future [[Development Wiki]]; It is certainly going to attract like-minded people. The odds of a typical [[Recyclopedia contributor]] becoming a [[Consumerium contributor]] are likely much higher than the odds of a [[Wikipedia]], [[Metaweb]] or [[Disinfopedia]] contributor doing so. It seems that it is devoted to presenting a negotiated [[consensus]] between [[Reds]] and [[Greens]] and various [[anarchist]] views. | We might consider these to be the best prototype yet of the future [[Development Wiki]]; It is certainly going to attract like-minded people. The odds of a typical [[Recyclopedia contributor]] becoming a [[Consumerium contributor]] are likely much higher than the odds of a [[Wikipedia]], [[Metaweb]] or [[Disinfopedia]] contributor doing so. It seems that it is devoted to presenting a negotiated [[consensus]] between [[Reds]] and [[Greens]] and various [[anarchist]] views. | ||
''Accordingly, if a lot of these users come over we may need to recruit some [[Blues]] or [[Pinks]] to balance these rather hardcore views. One problem at a time.'' | ''Accordingly, if a lot of these users come over we may need to recruit some [[Blues]] or [[Pinks]] to balance these rather hardcore views. One problem at a time.'' | ||
Revision as of 20:46, 8 March 2004
Recyclopedia (at recyclopedia.info) is probably the most closely aligned encyclopedia project using the wikitext standard pioneered by mediawiki and now better implemented in GetWiki. It appears to be an aspect of the Wikinfo project.
We might consider these to be the best prototype yet of the future Development Wiki; It is certainly going to attract like-minded people. The odds of a typical Recyclopedia contributor becoming a Consumerium contributor are likely much higher than the odds of a Wikipedia, Metaweb or Disinfopedia contributor doing so. It seems that it is devoted to presenting a negotiated consensus between Reds and Greens and various anarchist views.
Accordingly, if a lot of these users come over we may need to recruit some Blues or Pinks to balance these rather hardcore views. One problem at a time.