The [[Content Wiki]] will have more need for such a process than [[Opinion Wiki]], since its content directly alters the [[consumerium buying signal]]
2 KB (272 words) - 03:58, 16 February 2004
:A:Our back end relies on [[opinion wiki]] comments compiled by software using a [[wikitext standard]]. [[Sema
2 KB (286 words) - 02:10, 8 June 2004
Using [[Wiki code]] to encode and store [[Content wiki|facts]] and [[Opinion wiki|opinions]] enables '''anyone''' with:
2 KB (247 words) - 14:25, 24 November 2003
...to make to the MediaWiki software to enable running [[Content Wiki]] and [[Opinion Wiki]]. A similar page exists for each other [[wiki code]] option.
...-subsitution which is really useful for displaying [[campaign]] stats in [[Opinion Wiki]] articles among other things.
11 KB (1,801 words) - 12:55, 6 June 2004
International trade has it's good and bad sides. The opinion about what is good and what is bad about it vary strongly in the [[politica
2 KB (269 words) - 13:15, 21 September 2004
===[[Opinion Wiki]]===
2 KB (236 words) - 14:41, 26 August 2005
...bureaucracy in a gov't handles "content" and the politicians only handle "opinion"? I think it isn't.
5 KB (726 words) - 17:50, 2 September 2004
...ecessity of fulfilling those requests to the [[company]] in question via [[Opinion Wiki]] and [[Content Wiki]]. Naturally fulfilled [[Workplace Upgrade|Workpl
2 KB (289 words) - 22:00, 29 November 2003
...mply that [[Campaigns]] are maintained in the [[Signal Wiki]] instead of [[Opinion Wiki]] (which you strangely equate with [[Research Wiki]])
...idea to distinguishing [[Consumerium Services]] into two [[Wikis]], the [[Opinion Wiki]] with stricter semantics, higher access security and more controlled
8 KB (1,326 words) - 17:49, 5 March 2004
*"research and opinion can be differentiated objectively"
2 KB (317 words) - 17:23, 30 June 2004
The people who developed the MIPS were of the opinion that [[material]]s displacement and usage were of more importance than the
945 bytes (151 words) - 12:43, 28 October 2018
*[[Opinion Wiki]]
2 KB (225 words) - 17:01, 6 February 2005
...nd propaganda useless. Wiki can cope with all the complexities of multiple opinion systems and will lead to more transparency and new decision processes anywa
2 KB (273 words) - 17:25, 2 July 2004
.../wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Opinion_Wiki" class='internal' title="Opinion Wiki">Opinion Wiki</a> (9366 bytes)</li>
7 KB (971 words) - 17:52, 9 February 2004
...ne vote when meeting is called to make decisions ([[split]], [[merge]]r, [[opinion change]], [[nullify]]ing) of the campaign
...e the introduction of Campaign management by Wiki and the included idea of Opinion Wiki accepting and handling votes this scheme is a little broken
5 KB (706 words) - 21:33, 27 September 2006
What is the application of person_DTD in cium in your opinion? Automatic [[w:nepotism]] through [[w:FOAF]]?
3 KB (483 words) - 08:16, 27 April 2003
...would damage the credibility of the vote and of my software. This is in my opinion a strong argument in favour of having the vote conducted on a separate secu
:::It's my opinion, idiot. Not amateur psychiatry or a pronouncement of absolute truth from a
5 KB (877 words) - 12:49, 19 May 2010
...Wiki]] or [[Publish Wiki]] and certainly can't determine "what is just an Opinion" on his or her own
2 KB (382 words) - 14:42, 29 July 2004
...w before horde(s) of [[trolls]] edited. Or see [[best cases]] for how the opinion wiki should enable the whole project.''
...ll at all - hence we use '''opinion''' for now, and maybe consider that '''opinion''' can be seen as '''research''' by those who really believe in the premise
11 KB (1,748 words) - 16:51, 5 August 2004
...one [[faction]], or otherwise make a statement that it is only one group's opinion.
3 KB (425 words) - 18:41, 26 February 2004