9 September 2004
- 18:2918:29, 9 September 2004 diff hist +105 Wikipedia (from 142 perspective) No edit summary
- 18:2818:28, 9 September 2004 diff hist +20 Talk:Wiki corruption revert vandalism; the point of a libel suit is to end Wikimedia corruption and its influence on the GFDL corpus; there is no point talking about corruption without that possibility current
- 18:2618:26, 9 September 2004 diff hist +4 Talk:Wikipedia (Reds) revert censorship; certainly from the POV of Wikipedia (Reds) there absolutely IS Wikimedia corruption, you are imposing YOUR POV on this legitimate faction - do so in Wikipedia (Blues) or whatev
- 18:2418:24, 9 September 2004 diff hist +152 Deleted No edit summary
- 18:2318:23, 9 September 2004 diff hist +194 N Fred Bauder No edit summary current
- 18:2218:22, 9 September 2004 diff hist +122 Wikinfo Bauder as Lowest Troll of Research Wiki? Worth considering
- 18:2018:20, 9 September 2004 diff hist +652 N Perjury No edit summary current
- 18:1618:16, 9 September 2004 diff hist +2,387 N Chief Editor a key post
- 18:0918:09, 9 September 2004 diff hist +2,552 N Consumerium Governance Organization election No edit summary current
- 17:5917:59, 9 September 2004 diff hist +785 User talk:Juxo time for real editorial policy
- 17:5517:55, 9 September 2004 diff hist +400 Talk:Wikipedia (Reds) is structural corruption now past the point of "fixing", or, can Wikipedia by fixed by kicking out Wales, Mayer, Starling, Moeller and Beesley?
- 17:5217:52, 9 September 2004 diff hist +46 N Unsubstantiated claims #REDIRECT false and unsubstantiated claims current
- 17:5117:51, 9 September 2004 diff hist +976 N Enemy project No edit summary current
- 17:4717:47, 9 September 2004 diff hist +889 Wikipedia No edit summary
- 17:4317:43, 9 September 2004 diff hist +407 Class action suit revert attempt to trivialize: the GFDL contributors do not "feel" they are deprived, they can PROVE this, and there are MANY cases of alleged and collective identity and libel re: WM current
- 17:4217:42, 9 September 2004 diff hist +641 Wikipedia (Reds) fate of Wikimedia in Reds' view, Richardchilton's perspective
- 17:3917:39, 9 September 2004 diff hist +9,030 Wikipedia (Reds) fixing cut off intro, adding introduction from Reds perspective
- 17:3517:35, 9 September 2004 diff hist +5,121 N Wikipedia (Reds) moved
- 17:3517:35, 9 September 2004 diff hist −13,719 Wikipedia (from 142 perspective) #REDIRECT Wikipedia (Reds) - this is a factional view shared by many commentators, all of whom are invited to contribute to it
- 17:3317:33, 9 September 2004 diff hist +574 What Consumerium is not revert vandalism; real people don't accept "rules" from garbage/sysops who devote their lives to libelling and censoring others - get lost
- 17:3117:31, 9 September 2004 diff hist +26 False and unsubstantiated claims No edit summary
- 17:3017:30, 9 September 2004 diff hist +2,155 N False and unsubstantiated claims No edit summary
- 17:2317:23, 9 September 2004 diff hist +2,155 N Class action suit grounds for such suits, which now seem inevitable
- 17:1517:15, 9 September 2004 diff hist +2,536 N Talk:Wiki corruption the Wikimedia corruption is spreading HERE: some suggestions on how to stop it: 1. redirect w: to WIkinfo, 2. invite entire Wikipedia Red Faction into CGO, and so on
- 17:0517:05, 9 September 2004 diff hist +18 Wikimedia corruption revert; If you want discussion of Wikipedia to tail off, redirect w: to Wikinfo - until then, this is a main issue and main topic of discussion
- 17:0317:03, 9 September 2004 diff hist +886 User:Jukeboksi/Blog/September2004 poor judgement
- 16:5816:58, 9 September 2004 diff hist +1,686 Guidelines for claiming corruption cases in Research Wiki why these "guidelines" are worthless: constant sysop vandalism of any attempt to document the claims or any background material that supports arguments that this is bad for GFDL corpus current
- 16:5116:51, 9 September 2004 diff hist +7,318 N Talk:Wikipedia (Reds) (talk about) what Reds think of Wikipedia
- 16:5016:50, 9 September 2004 diff hist −7,283 Talk:Wikipedia (from 142 perspective) whole Red Faction seems to share this perspective, there is no "142 perspective", that's just an IP range current
- 16:4816:48, 9 September 2004 diff hist +324 Deleted sorry sysop
- 16:4716:47, 9 September 2004 diff hist +454 N Talk:False or unsubstantiated claims of corruption No edit summary
- 16:4216:42, 9 September 2004 diff hist +756 User:Jukeboksi/Blog/September2004 game over