Wikipedia (Reds): Difference between revisions - Consumerium development wiki

(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)

Line 5:

[[Wikimedia]] is not the lawful nor responsible [[steward]] of the [[GFDL corpus]] but a gang of [[usurper]]s who seek to prevent other [[GFDL corpus access provider]]s from placing themselves in a central position to distribute upgrades to that corpus. It is sometimes accused of collaborating with [[Bomis]]'s commercial interests and even more of [[alleged Wikimedia corruption]]. It is very likely to be the targets of complaints and lawsuits especially from the [[Wikipedia Red Faction]] that it has recently censored.

This [[clique]] also regularly authorizes and encourages censorship of articles of interest to [[Pinks]] and [[Greens]] such as [[w:Genuine Progress Indicator]].

In general, [[Reds]] consider there to be no negotiating nor accomodation with [[Wikimedia]] but view the [[troll-sysop struggle]] there as directly towards ultimately [[ending Wikimedia]] and replacing it with a more accountable structure with no history of [[GodKing]]s nor [[priestly hierarchy]] nor [[command hierarchy]]. ''See the analysis of [[English Wikipedia User Richardchilton]] for more on the prospect of withdrawing and helping destroy it from a distance.''

==Wikipedia Itself==

Line 101:

Line 105:

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 [[Wikimedia]] is not the lawful nor responsible [[steward]] of the [[GFDL corpus]] but a gang of [[usurper]]s who seek to prevent other [[GFDL corpus access provider]]s from placing themselves in a central position to distribute upgrades to that corpus.  It is sometimes accused of collaborating with [[Bomis]]'s commercial interests and even more of [[alleged Wikimedia corruption]].  It is very likely to be the targets of complaints and lawsuits especially from the [[Wikipedia Red Faction]] that it has recently censored.
+This [[clique]] also regularly authorizes and encourages censorship of articles of interest to [[Pinks]] and [[Greens]] such as [[w:Genuine Progress Indicator]].
+In general, [[Reds]] consider there to be no negotiating nor accomodation with [[Wikimedia]] but view the [[troll-sysop struggle]] there as directly towards ultimately [[ending Wikimedia]] and replacing it with a more accountable structure with no history of [[GodKing]]s nor [[priestly hierarchy]] nor [[command hierarchy]].  ''See the analysis of [[English Wikipedia User Richardchilton]] for more on the prospect of withdrawing and helping destroy it from a distance.''
 ==Wikipedia Itself==
@@ Line 101: / Line 105: @@
 See also: [[Wikipedia Red Faction]]