User contributions for 142.177.109.161
9 September 2004
- 21:3821:38, 9 September 2004 diff hist +501 Talk:Wikipedia No edit summary
- 21:3521:35, 9 September 2004 diff hist +13,854 N Wikipedia (142 trolls) moved current
- 21:3521:35, 9 September 2004 diff hist −13,818 Wikipedia (from 142 perspective) "from" and "perspective" are redundant - moving to Wikipedia (142 trolls) to name article after commenting faction current
- 21:3221:32, 9 September 2004 diff hist +130 Wikipedia No edit summary
- 21:2821:28, 9 September 2004 diff hist +1,050 N Central control No edit summary current
- 21:2421:24, 9 September 2004 diff hist +607 N Authoritarianism No edit summary
- 21:2121:21, 9 September 2004 diff hist +558 N User-owned, user-run, user-controlled No edit summary current
- 21:1921:19, 9 September 2004 diff hist 0 Wikipedia (Richard Chilton) No edit summary
- 21:1821:18, 9 September 2004 diff hist +783 N Wikipedia (Richard Chilton) No edit summary
- 21:1021:10, 9 September 2004 diff hist +190 English Wikipedia User Richardchilton this excerpt could be titled Wikipedia (Richard Chilton) and is another perspective that should be integrated into Wikipedia (Reds) - the more Reds that explain the truth the better
- 20:3320:33, 9 September 2004 diff hist +64 Talk:Independent board avoid virtual community fanatics lusting to apply the police metaphor
- 20:3220:32, 9 September 2004 diff hist +1,886 Talk:Independent board candidates?
- 19:3819:38, 9 September 2004 diff hist −74 Wikinfo removing irrelevant nonsense - the Metaweb article on Wikinfo is entirely non-controversial and who wrote it is irrelevant - if anyone wants to know, they can look at its Page History there easily
- 19:3319:33, 9 September 2004 diff hist +535 User:Jukeboksi/Blog/September2004 are you actually tough enough to DO this job, Juxo? do you really think Monsanto or McDonald's or Exxon is going to be EASIER to deal with than Bomis/Wikimedia? tough it out and prove that you CAN
- 19:3019:30, 9 September 2004 diff hist +6 Research:claims of corruption #REDIRECT Guidelines for claiming corruption cases in Research Wiki woops odd name, too long to actually remember, thus probably a bad name current
- 19:3019:30, 9 September 2004 diff hist +65 N Research:claims of corruption #REDIRECT guidelines for claiming corruption in Research Wiki - rather than develop a whole "in" ...building metaphor, let's have a Research: space until en.consumerium.org exists
- 19:2919:29, 9 September 2004 diff hist −23 Guidelines for claims of corruption #REDIRECT Research:claims of corruption
- 19:2819:28, 9 September 2004 diff hist +66 N Guidelines for claims of corruption #REDIRECT guidelines for claims of corruption in Research Wiki; in general, such claims will be limited in Develop Wiki to those directly affecting operations or reliability of GFDL data
- 19:2719:27, 9 September 2004 diff hist +8 Talk:Guidelines for claiming corruption cases in Research Wiki fix link current
- 19:2519:25, 9 September 2004 diff hist +154 Test case No edit summary current