Search results

  • ...context is [[The Consumerium Exchange]], which led to debates on [[edits, votes and bets]].''
    386 bytes (57 words) - 14:14, 12 April 2021
  • Direct votes are: ...bgcolor="Black"><font color=yellow>'''0'''</font></td><td bgcolor="White">Votes middle</td>
    7 KB (1,058 words) - 14:26, 12 April 2021
  • ...gs much [[honour]] on [[troll-friendlies]] who support it - ''see [[edits, votes and bets]] for a way to actually reward making [[troll-friendly offer]]s th
    951 bytes (144 words) - 20:24, 30 August 2004
  • ...ect, but so is asking them to explicitly choose who to trust (see [[edits, votes and bets]]).
    1 KB (165 words) - 22:10, 3 March 2004
  • ...ng organisations space to the new organsations space. Now all the previous votes would still point to the previous location of the campaign. Maybe there is
    1 KB (207 words) - 16:10, 4 November 2004
  • * The ability for users to start votes
    1 KB (164 words) - 11:56, 24 July 2004
  • However, there is a use for electronic [[edits, votes and bets]] in the ordinary daily types of decisions that do not involve cho
    1 KB (220 words) - 16:10, 26 June 2004
  • ''See [[edits, votes and bets]] for the debate about how to decide the final *[[Direct Vote]] requires many votes and rewards heavy participation, and,
    4 KB (670 words) - 10:44, 20 October 2012
  • ...ement by Wiki and the included idea of Opinion Wiki accepting and handling votes this scheme is a little broken
    5 KB (706 words) - 21:33, 27 September 2006
  • How '''[[edits]], [[voting|votes]] and [[betting|bets]]''' affect the [[Consumerium buying signal]] (via the ...a system, to get an idea of how controversial it might be to relate edits, votes and bets to life and death decisions.''
    2 KB (339 words) - 14:25, 12 April 2021
  • ...n Wiki]]. Also other types of votes have been proposed see [[Voting]] or [[Votes]] on this
    4 KB (547 words) - 14:22, 14 May 2005
  • [[Trolls]] advocate that [[faction]]s have ways to combine [[edits, votes and bets]] in such a way that only information that the factions can agree
    1 KB (244 words) - 01:37, 6 August 2004
  • 4 KB (675 words) - 17:11, 2 December 2003
  • ...objectively that an [[IP range block]] exists, or that an article is on [[Votes for deletion]], or even that its neutrality is disputed, without necessaril
    2 KB (254 words) - 13:41, 9 September 2004
  • ...s crap into [[Consumerium:intermediate page]]s that they sign and [[edits, votes and bets|somehow stake something on so we know they believe it]]. ...s it's not offensive) and if it bears no resemblance to reality then the [[votes|support]] of the Campaign would be relatively low rendering it "out of sigh
    6 KB (1,000 words) - 20:15, 14 March 2004
  • :::How [[edits, votes and bets]] combine as transactions in [[wiki management]] - and [[electroll
    2 KB (320 words) - 18:02, 2 June 2004
  • :Yup. Suspect DK could contribute to [[edits, votes and bets]].
    2 KB (276 words) - 19:37, 11 March 2004
  • ...sers''' but maybe still exclude them from the main counting. But excluding votes by banned onwiki users would lead easily to [[sysop vandalism]].
    2 KB (365 words) - 15:23, 6 July 2017
  • ...f [[answer recommendation]] relying say on [[approval voting]] or [[edits, votes and bets]] in some other combination, that all factions accept as "objectiv
    2 KB (245 words) - 01:20, 6 August 2004
  • *integrating [[edits, votes and bets]] across many [[large public wiki]]s
    2 KB (270 words) - 07:46, 7 August 2004
View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)