Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators
9,842
edits
User:Jukeboksi/Blog/December2012: Difference between revisions
rearranging in order of significance for Consumium plans
(→Friday 2012-12-14: tuning the motivation for supporting voter's right to vanish) |
(rearranging in order of significance for Consumium plans) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Friday 2012-12-14 == | == Friday 2012-12-14 == | ||
[[Wikipedia]] + [[Wikidata]] ( Wikibase-[[Extension]] ) + [[DBpedia]] + [[Commons]] + wikidata.consumium.org + files.consumium.org + [[Wikitravel]] + [[Wikivoyage]] ( WMF competitor to Wikitravel ) + [[Transnationale]] + [[Responsible Shopper]] + [[Ethical Consumer]] == more then enough for moving onto the D&D phase ( deployment & development ) after 10.5 yrs in the R&D phase given that implementing the voting is not necessary to get started on building wiki. | [[Wikipedia]] + [[Wikidata]] ( Wikibase-[[Extension]] ) + [[DBpedia]] + [[Commons]] + wikidata.consumium.org + files.consumium.org + [[Wikitravel]] + [[Wikivoyage]] ( WMF competitor to Wikitravel ) + [[Transnationale]] + [[Responsible Shopper]] + [[Ethical Consumer]] == more then enough for moving onto the D&D phase ( deployment & development ) after 10.5 yrs in the R&D phase given that implementing the voting is not necessary to get started on building wiki. | ||
The [[voting]] plans are now brainsane but implementation is complicated. We'd really need crypto & provability experts to design the voting/vote counting framework. To facilitate the social media game we must give users the ability to reveal sub-sets of their votes to different audiences. Voters must apparently be assigned an ID to enable to track vote flow from counting time to counting time accompanied by an implementation that fully respects '''[[Right to vanish]]''' by means of '''taking a new id discarding the old one and setting all vote sets non-visible''' and no-one except you knows ( who knows ) who you are voter-wise, privacy restored. | The [[voting]] plans are now brainsane but implementation is complicated. We'd really need crypto & provability experts to design the voting/vote counting framework. To facilitate the social media game we must give users the ability to reveal sub-sets of their votes to different audiences. Voters must apparently be assigned an ID to enable to track vote flow from counting time to counting time accompanied by an implementation that fully respects '''[[Right to vanish]]''' by means of '''taking a new id discarding the old one and setting all vote sets non-visible''' and no-one except you knows ( who knows ) who you are voter-wise, privacy restored. | ||
http://slashdot.org/faq/metamod.shtml metamoderation ( known as M2 ), a system where '''the oldest 92.5% accounts''' have rights to M2 which is to moderate the moderations of random moderators. Someone in irc described that the introduction of M2 to Slashdot quickly got almost fully rid of [[vandalism]]. | |||