Search results

  • ...uest: Please, ''please'' stop this horrible menace! Find every copy of '''mediawiki''' and shred it now '''before it's too late and we're all contaminated by i ...th have strongly resisted any standardization that would allow any outside developers, much more competent as a rule, to compete with them to "manage" the vast [
    1 KB (187 words) - 18:05, 9 March 2004
  • ...developers much smarter than [[mediawiki|average run of the mill mediocre developers]].
    908 bytes (136 words) - 17:50, 26 February 2004
  • ...effort required to create MySQL dumps might better be spent harassing the developers to make XML dumps work. They do in [[usemod]].
    1 KB (178 words) - 14:42, 27 January 2004
  • ...Interwiki link standard]] that you are requesting [[MediaWiki]] (or other) developers to reverse from ...ation is automatic, no brains required, no knowledge of which version of [[MediaWiki]] or [[GetWiki]] they run, etc..
    1 KB (205 words) - 19:52, 9 March 2004
  • [[MediaWiki]] has no full text search facility ...[[Wikipedia]] that has turned it off, "because of the load", i.e. because mediawiki on that junk hardware run by the 'foundation' can't handle it.
    3 KB (480 words) - 13:44, 29 September 2004
  • '''[[MediaWiki developer]] payment''' has been proposed by [[Erik Moeller]][http://meta.wi ...would it be clear to donors or participants that they were paying software developers?
    932 bytes (139 words) - 01:48, 26 July 2004
  • Due to [[Wikimedia corruption]] and [[Mediawiki]] deficiencies (likely related) the [[Wikimedia]] [[usurper]]s do not recog :::These are issues that should be taken up with the developers of [[MediaWiki]] --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 22:34, 18 Jun 2004 (EEST)
    2 KB (249 words) - 22:15, 18 June 2004
  • [[Mediawiki]] supports a deliberately Wikipedia-centric scheme in which for instance "[ ...] would still point to the French wikipedia. This is '''with the current [[MediaWiki]] release candidate''', so stop whining that other people are not working h
    6 KB (912 words) - 18:29, 7 September 2004
  • Consumerium is using [[Mediawiki]] for its R&D work very succesfully since [[w:March|March]] [[w:10|10]] [[w There is discussion between alternate wiki platforms though [[Mediawiki]] is the most likely candidate due to the following reasons:
    2 KB (302 words) - 18:57, 23 July 2013
  • ...this misfeature off. Or, even more constructively, ask the [[MediaWiki]] developers to offer more choices for open links at the sysop level than just "edit thi
    1 KB (224 words) - 02:05, 25 November 2003
  • ...and in Winter 2004, [[Consumerium:We|we]] started recruiting [[Consumerium developers]] to kick tires and work out more details; first drafts of [[Consumerium L :Progress as of March 15, 2004 includes [[MediaWiki modifications]] requested, and a start at sketching [[Consumerium Process]]
    2 KB (295 words) - 00:31, 30 March 2004
  • ...rce]] [[w:web analytics]] application developed by a team of international developers, that runs on a [[w:PHP]]/[[w:MySQL]] webserver.|Wikipedia|[[w:Matomo (soft ...ise instance for analytics which is located in Helsinki, Finland for the [[MediaWiki]]s and also Wordpress at [https://consumerium.org/ consumerium.org] and [ht
    2 KB (258 words) - 13:55, 23 February 2021
  • ...ter, I deleted it as an unused redirect. Why you always gotta be so anti-[[MediaWiki]]? :::It's easier to tolerate mediawiki when it does not invent stupid names that are not in the dictionary. IT is
    6 KB (954 words) - 19:42, 27 August 2005
  • ...[http://getwiki.net/ .net]''' is the improved software that is a fork of [[MediaWiki]], in use at [[Wikinfo]]. ''It should probably be listed in the comparison ...ards-related articles from [[Wikinfo]] to make it harder for [[mediawiki]] developers to find, and etc..
    2 KB (315 words) - 15:31, 24 April 2012
  • ...ots here to hack up the page too - remember that since this we are using [[MediaWiki]], we're strongly biased to it, and so, we should expect to have to do much ...vince MoinMoin or TikiWiki zealots to come here and submit their work to a MediaWiki-based forum. Also it would be good to know what technology that http://nat
    7 KB (1,152 words) - 20:41, 4 July 2010
  • ...ed the [[enemy projects]], but is run with the assistance of [[Wikipedia]] developers, and therefore suspect in the eyes of [[troll]]s) and the Consumerium R&D w ...ression utility provides access to the strings, only one software suite ([[mediawiki]]) can actually present it, as there is no [[wikitext standard]] - a form o
    2 KB (318 words) - 13:03, 23 June 2004
  • [[File:MediaWiki logo.png|thumb|right|180px|[[mw:MediaWiki]] logo]] '''MediaWiki''' [http://www.mediawiki.org (.org)] is the software [[Consumerium]] uses on its [[R&D wiki]] which
    7 KB (1,078 words) - 10:07, 21 September 2021
  • ...ikimedia]] wishes its own URIs to be stable, but those of other users of [[MediaWiki]] software to be ever-changing, and thus difficult to remember. This makes :[[GetWiki]] developers in general resist that claim and are far more likely to implement the '''st
    2 KB (386 words) - 13:58, 3 January 2005
  • ...s into [[Wikipedia]]. Even the same people run it, like the [[Mediawiki]] developers and [[Wikimedia]] founders, who have no values worth respecting.
    2 KB (392 words) - 01:44, 2 March 2004
  • ..., [[MediaWiki/extensions|extensions]], [[MediaWiki/widgets|widgets]] and [[MediaWiki/bots|bots]] ( all running on Debian GNU/Linux LAMP-servers-from-cloud ) nee All languages will be served from single wiki utilizing [[mw:MediaWiki Language Extension Bundle]].
    9 KB (1,308 words) - 12:28, 30 July 2020
View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)