Search results

...e DB of some 350 big companies with well researched information and public opinion

'''A Campaigner is someone who is participating in a [[Campaign]] in the [[Opinion Wiki]] by:'''

...ser]] vs. [[Verified User]]. ''Groups and VirtualGroups as described in [[Opinion Wiki]] '''may''' be implemented here, mostly likely as [[faction]]s and [[t <small>'''Publish Wiki''' will take on the role of [[Opinion Wiki]], which was an ad-hoc development purpose name for discovering how [[

...ganization]] will keep a close eye on sysops in the [[content wiki]] and [[opinion wiki]], and will govern them and give them more or less power depending sol

=== Content vs. opinion - where is neutrality possible? desirable? === ...is disputed in the content wiki? Removing isolating disputed claims to [[Opinion Wiki]] circles is not enough.

"Scenarios should include extremes and those that contradict popular opinion" - Algorithmics Inc., probably the world's most advanced scenario analysis

...ho dispute the ability of anyone to tell "sympathetic" from "critical" or "opinion" from "research", would prefer that this article be from a very critical PO ...t]]s to prevail in [[Publish Wiki]] as long as there is such a thing as "[[Opinion Wiki]]" which requires vandalism ([[sysop vandalism|someone deciding things

...is, rather than rely on [[Consumerium researchers]] exclusively for their opinion of say which [[standard label]]s were about to become important, it would b

...ther material will be spun off into [[Research Wiki]], formerly known as [[Opinion Wiki]], which will be a [[large public wiki]] with slightly better [[govern ...because before the distinction between [[Content Wiki]] (for facts) and [[Opinion Wiki]] (for subjective views and campaigns based on subjective criteria) wa

...specify how any [[improvement]] that is generated in the [[R&D wiki]] or [[opinion wiki]] or [[Consumerium maintenance]] etc. is to be documented, published,

...g [[product]]s within a [[product group]] by their composite rating from [[Opinion Wiki]] might be a partial solution. Perhaps [[Campaign]]s could have other ...onmental friendliness and it can maybe done by utilizing composites from [[Opinion Wiki]]

:Ummm. No, not in my humble opinion. I've been thinking about the [[score|score scale]] for a long time and I'v ...any country, but rather trust the usual methods ie. [[campaigns]] in the [[Opinion Wiki]] to do that, but I see your motivation for writing this article and '

...se if they found information they had placed in a [[content wiki]] or an [[opinion wiki]] was being used in ways that was detrimental to their business or rep

*[[faction]]s - representing differences of opinion within the system itself

...the [[company]] in question and it's executives via [[Content Wiki]] and [[Opinion Wiki]].

Instead, Surowiecki's "Wise crowds" are described as having (1) diversity of opinion; (2) independence of members from one another; (3) decentralization; and (4

...d. ''See [[Talk:Development_Wiki]] for debate on the naming scheme, and [[Opinion Wiki]] for how it might work.'' <small>This bears similarity to [[Opinion Wiki]], which is now mostly planned to be implemented in the [[Signal Wiki]

...gh a [[glossary]] defined by a [[faction]] through its own subset of the [[opinion wiki]]. Rules for this are not the same as those of the [[content wiki]].

:"I really want a separate Opinion Wiki simply because we can aggregate data (votes on campaigns etc.) via SQL

merits of, the [[product]]. Probably filtered from [[opinion wiki]].