User contributions for 142.177.109.161
9 September 2004
- 19:3819:38, 9 September 2004 diff hist −74 Wikinfo removing irrelevant nonsense - the Metaweb article on Wikinfo is entirely non-controversial and who wrote it is irrelevant - if anyone wants to know, they can look at its Page History there easily
- 19:3319:33, 9 September 2004 diff hist +535 User:Jukeboksi/Blog/September2004 are you actually tough enough to DO this job, Juxo? do you really think Monsanto or McDonald's or Exxon is going to be EASIER to deal with than Bomis/Wikimedia? tough it out and prove that you CAN
- 19:3019:30, 9 September 2004 diff hist +6 Research:claims of corruption #REDIRECT Guidelines for claiming corruption cases in Research Wiki woops odd name, too long to actually remember, thus probably a bad name current
- 19:3019:30, 9 September 2004 diff hist +65 N Research:claims of corruption #REDIRECT guidelines for claiming corruption in Research Wiki - rather than develop a whole "in" ...building metaphor, let's have a Research: space until en.consumerium.org exists
- 19:2919:29, 9 September 2004 diff hist −23 Guidelines for claims of corruption #REDIRECT Research:claims of corruption
- 19:2819:28, 9 September 2004 diff hist +66 N Guidelines for claims of corruption #REDIRECT guidelines for claims of corruption in Research Wiki; in general, such claims will be limited in Develop Wiki to those directly affecting operations or reliability of GFDL data
- 19:2719:27, 9 September 2004 diff hist +8 Talk:Guidelines for claiming corruption cases in Research Wiki fix link current
- 19:2519:25, 9 September 2004 diff hist +154 Test case No edit summary current
- 19:2419:24, 9 September 2004 diff hist +1,753 N Test case No edit summary
- 19:1719:17, 9 September 2004 diff hist +40 N Resarch Wiki pilot #REDIRECT Consumerium Research pilot current
- 19:1619:16, 9 September 2004 diff hist +1,424 N Talk:Guidelines for claiming corruption cases in Research Wiki usefulness
- 19:0919:09, 9 September 2004 diff hist +18 Wikimedia corruption #REDIRECT alleged Wikimedia corruption; that page is now balanced with clear marking of fact vs. allegation, transparent lying coverup "Response" from Wikimedia, and devastating "Counter", so current
- 19:0719:07, 9 September 2004 diff hist +543 Chief Editor No edit summary
- 19:0119:01, 9 September 2004 diff hist +456 Independent board No edit summary
- 18:5918:59, 9 September 2004 diff hist +2,042 Independent board definition from private sector, for use in resolving corruption claims and so on
- 18:5218:52, 9 September 2004 diff hist +3,670 Claims of corruption repairing vandalism damage: the source of the claims doesn't matter if they are easily documented, as they are (how to do so is now listed here), making "allegation" vs. "fact" more clear
- 18:3118:31, 9 September 2004 diff hist +4 Talk:Wikipedia (Reds) no delinking of Wikimedia corruption : it is the whole basis of the Reds' critique, you can't gut it like this in a talk page from Reds' perspective
- 18:2918:29, 9 September 2004 diff hist +18 N Consumerium:Reds #REDIRECT Reds; temporary redirect; when Consumerium:Reds are recognized formally as a faction of Consumerium:We, this can become a real article current
- 18:2918:29, 9 September 2004 diff hist +105 Wikipedia (from 142 perspective) No edit summary
- 18:2818:28, 9 September 2004 diff hist +20 Talk:Wiki corruption revert vandalism; the point of a libel suit is to end Wikimedia corruption and its influence on the GFDL corpus; there is no point talking about corruption without that possibility current