Search results
Page title matches
- Any encouragement to hurry along the demise of enemy projects is of course not to be an action of the [[Consumerium Governance Organizati ...the usual [[ad hominem delete]]s. So Wikipedia remains one of the [[enemy projects]].6 KB (1,055 words) - 21:35, 12 April 2004
Page text matches
- ...own project. It is useful to create [[dialectic]] or contrasts with an '''enemy project''' to better define what one wishes to do in a friendly project. F See list of [[enemy projects]] that contrast/fight with [[Consumerium:Itself]].976 bytes (136 words) - 17:51, 9 September 2004
- ...ny purpose, and certainly an unpleasant project to work on, as all [[enemy projects]] soon will be.716 bytes (121 words) - 21:15, 10 February 2004
- ...o role in Consumerium, and has effectively become one of the worst [[enemy projects]] - something that is not a basis for translation, for definition, and is d ...trolls]] so they do not also destroy ''this'' project, or any [[essential projects]] we care about, might even be discussed someday if there is a serious exam3 KB (490 words) - 23:20, 7 January 2004
- *a peer or friend to the [[enemy projects]] which are competing directly with us for attention from skilled people, a *any of the [[essential projects]] - we don't compete with them to do the work they do, and we hope they are1 KB (221 words) - 22:01, 19 August 2005
- *[[Enemy projects]] (22 links) - will impede [[Consumerium Services]]570 bytes (75 words) - 21:51, 18 August 2004
- ...heir values and technology and culture can't be kept away from [[essential projects]] whose [[integrity]] that the caretaker wants to protect.2 KB (264 words) - 14:45, 14 January 2004
- ...s of the GFDL text corpus will likely be set here, not in the larger/other projects, which will become less trustworthy over time.2 KB (375 words) - 04:46, 28 December 2003
- ...they seek to be extremely hated by [[inquisitor]]s, since "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" and others who object to '''witch-hunt'''s on principle will ...d enemies. Sadly this requires everone else to, as well, and note [[enemy projects]] that they have taken over, and which will tend to train others to employ2 KB (398 words) - 21:06, 7 January 2004
- ...! Please be sure to read [[142.177.X.X/Anti_Wikipedia_Rants]] and [[enemy projects]]! You'll enjoy them for sure. But other than learning from others' mista :rendezvous with [[essential projects]] that share our core values of moral responsibility for what you buy ([[po2 KB (258 words) - 02:51, 2 April 2004
- ...and where they are typically only defined in their most common usage. In projects that have a defining vocabulary, it is an error to use any words that is no ...s for translation will probably be the first obvious failure among [[enemy projects]]. By no means should their policies be emulated or adopted here!2 KB (341 words) - 22:30, 7 January 2004
- ...pedia]] and other projects that could have been useful background material projects. :These people are the ENEMY of life on this planet, that's what you don't seem to understand. They are2 KB (389 words) - 18:28, 9 September 2004
- ....phtml?title=Enemy_projects" class='internal' title="Enemy projects">Enemy projects</a> (7879 bytes)</li> ...=Essential_projects" class='internal' title="Essential projects">Essential projects</a> (4377 bytes)</li>7 KB (971 words) - 17:52, 9 February 2004
- ...[[glossary]] and collaborating with [[essential projects]] and not [[enemy projects]].2 KB (345 words) - 23:26, 8 February 2004
- ...ighting in court and in the press, and has no problem digging up dirt on [[enemy project]]s and spreading it all over. ...tiated claims of corruption]] again and again until [[ending Wikimedia|his enemy is discredited, demoralized and destroyed]]. That's the kind of person we2 KB (400 words) - 08:14, 14 September 2004
- Any encouragement to hurry along the demise of enemy projects is of course not to be an action of the [[Consumerium Governance Organizati ...the usual [[ad hominem delete]]s. So Wikipedia remains one of the [[enemy projects]].6 KB (1,055 words) - 21:35, 12 April 2004
- ...e not actually turned the projects they have been involved in into [[enemy projects]] or done [[GodKing]] worship without question (almost the same thing, not ...[[Adbusters]] and [[Greenpeace]] people and others working on [[essential projects]] - we want to connect to these before they get taken over by people with a3 KB (585 words) - 19:04, 8 February 2004
- ...dia]] (which we might strongly support as Wikipedia has joined the [[enemy projects]], but is run with the assistance of [[Wikipedia]] developers, and therefor2 KB (318 words) - 13:03, 23 June 2004
- .... . Juxo (Talk) (deleted "Enemy project": content was: '#REDIRECT [[enemy projects]]') ...f) (hist) . . Consudev:Deletion log; 18:50 . . Juxo (Talk) (deleted "Enemy projects": was a redirect to [[AWR]]. last version by 142.177.X.X archived)9 KB (1,294 words) - 17:35, 24 July 2004
- ...itself]]. But, it's easier to track that by making sure that [[essential projects]] have at least the most basic terminology in common, e.g. that[http://www. ...s via CIV, then, '''Consumerpedia''' will just be an [[enemy project|enemy projects]] that distracts and distorts the reality. It does seem to be becoming exa5 KB (825 words) - 18:52, 21 September 2004
- ...o far actively resisted. There's danger it may become an [[enemy projects|enemy project]], applying political norms unfit for any cooperation. It is off t3 KB (547 words) - 11:47, 28 October 2018