Develop:itself: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    (typo, unlink link to this page - I get what you're saying but then again Categories are much more handy for this (due to the 2-way link functionality) then linking to a given page)
    (add modifying and extending software as the top-priority in development + governance and best practices + fix a couple of links)
     
    Line 4: Line 4:


    For instance:
    For instance:
    *developing new [[MediaWiki modifications|modifications]] or [[extensions]] to existing software
    *developing and adopting [[wiki best practices]] and trying to evolve [[wiki governance]] to meet up with the rising demands this sort of highly [[political]] effort poses
    *suggesting [[wiki software]] alternatives like [[tiddlywiki]]
    *suggesting [[wiki software]] alternatives like [[tiddlywiki]]
    *noting deficiencies or problems or ambitions for [[mediawiki]]
    *noting deficiencies or problems or ambitions for [[mediawiki]]
    Line 9: Line 11:
    *any comment about support for [[protocol]]s like [[VoIP]] or [[WiFi]]
    *any comment about support for [[protocol]]s like [[VoIP]] or [[WiFi]]


    ''Consumerium must also [[research itself]] and [[publish itself]].  See those pages.''
    ''Consumerium must also [[research:itself]] and [[publish:itself]].  See those pages.''

    Latest revision as of 20:41, 27 August 2005

    When making a comment about how Consumerium itself must develop itself, or how Develop:policy must change or Develop:namespace must grow, link to this page.

    This is a more specialized subpage of references to Consumerium itself. That is, any reference to how Consumerium must develop itself, is a reference to Consumerium itself.

    For instance:

    Consumerium must also research:itself and publish:itself. See those pages.