Talk:Claims of corruption: Difference between revisions
there is no motivation whatsoever for any reasonable person to talk to or contact Wales - and every motivation to disenfranchise him - the libel chill is plain as day, as are other legal ultimatum
(here's jimbo's post of 1 May (just in case 142.177.X.X attempts to censor it)) |
(there is no motivation whatsoever for any reasonable person to talk to or contact Wales - and every motivation to disenfranchise him - the libel chill is plain as day, as are other legal ultimatum) |
||
| Line 213: | Line 213: | ||
--Jimbo | --Jimbo | ||
::"honestly and simply raising the issues with me in an appropriate manner" is actually not possible since Wales has a policy of [[outing]] those who offer any criticism, and actually attaching bogus labels to their names like for instance "criminal" or "liar". Besides no one needs to discuss the [[GFDL]] with Wales, or ask his interpretation of it - he is not a lawyer and is not qualified to say what is reasonable interpretation, and with a pet board, he is certainly not committed to actually asking [[independent board]] opinions of any matter - so the upside of talking to him is zero, the downside considerable, and the [[trolls]] are doing the right thing to just continue to ignore him as much as they can and make note of all his legal errors for later eradication of [[Wikimedia]] in court. There is no reason in the world to have any conversation with this guy, and still less given this: | |||
:"...to finally take legal action to permanently ban them from the website, as well as providing an opportunity for me to file a libel claim against him. " | |||
::[[libel chill]] of the plainest sort, and a clear message: 'complain to me or any authority directly, and you can expect court orders issued against you once I have your name on paper' | |||
::the above says all it needs to say, and proves autocratic [[GodKing]] behaviour and total contempt for [[open content]] or its quality or completeness | |||