Jump to content

Databases: Difference between revisions

117 bytes added ,  26 August 2016
+ note about all the databases presented being able to store semantic data (maybe not efficiently, all of them)
(moved info to its own heading == Factors affecting database systems selections ==)
(+ note about all the databases presented being able to store semantic data (maybe not efficiently, all of them))
Line 7: Line 7:
** [[w:Graph databases|Graph databases]] would intuitively appear more advanced than using RDF-triplet composed semantic networks but are not much different on the outside. Both jump through the same hoops but with different efficiency and grace.
** [[w:Graph databases|Graph databases]] would intuitively appear more advanced than using RDF-triplet composed semantic networks but are not much different on the outside. Both jump through the same hoops but with different efficiency and grace.
** [[w:Object database|Object database]]s are old but on the rise with NoSQL-based thinking and the modern needs, like leanness, real-time need  and scaleability for which the other solutions might be too limiting.
** [[w:Object database|Object database]]s are old but on the rise with NoSQL-based thinking and the modern needs, like leanness, real-time need  and scaleability for which the other solutions might be too limiting.
All of these may be used to store semantic data though advantages and disadvantages vary depending on task at hand.


----
----
9,867

edits

We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.