Ontological distinction: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Ontological distinction (edit)

Revision as of 13:41, 9 September 2004

3 bytes removed , 9 September 2004

m

de-linking

Jukeboksi

Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators

9,842

edits

Revision as of 18:23, 28 June 2004 (edit) 142.177.97.194 (talk) No edit summary		Latest revision as of 13:41, 9 September 2004 (edit) (undo) Jukeboksi (talk \| contribs) m (de-linking)
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 5:		Line 5:
	[[Operational distinction]] is much simpler and less controversial and does not create or imply any POV. It is possible to say objectively that an [[IP range block]] exists, or that an article is on [[Votes for deletion]], or even that its neutrality is disputed, without necessarily having any particular POV or accepting any particular authority.		[[Operational distinction]] is much simpler and less controversial and does not create or imply any POV. It is possible to say objectively that an [[IP range block]] exists, or that an article is on [[Votes for deletion]], or even that its neutrality is disputed, without necessarily having any particular POV or accepting any particular authority.

	~~Failng~~ to distinguish ontological distinctions like "who are the [[trolls]]" from operational ones like "what IP numbers have been blocked in the past" is the basis of [[Wikimedia corruption]]. Those '''confusion'''s which serve the interests of [[Bomis]] corporation will be noticed and clarified, while those that do not, will not be.		Failing to distinguish ontological distinctions like "who are the [[trolls]]" from operational ones like "what IP numbers have been blocked in the past" is the basis of [[Wikimedia corruption]]. Those '''confusion'''s which serve the interests of Bomis corporation will be noticed and clarified, while those that do not, will not be.