Ontological distinction: Difference between revisions

m
typo
No edit summary
 
m (typo)
Line 5: Line 5:
[[Operational distinction]] is much simpler and less controversial and does not create or imply any POV.  It is possible to say objectively that an [[IP range block]] exists, or that an article is on [[Votes for deletion]], or even that its neutrality is disputed, without necessarily having any particular POV or accepting any particular authority.
[[Operational distinction]] is much simpler and less controversial and does not create or imply any POV.  It is possible to say objectively that an [[IP range block]] exists, or that an article is on [[Votes for deletion]], or even that its neutrality is disputed, without necessarily having any particular POV or accepting any particular authority.


Failng to distinguish ontological distinctions like "who are the [[trolls]]" from operational ones like "what IP numbers have been blocked in the past" is the basis of [[Wikimedia corruption]].  Those '''confusion'''s which serve the interests of [[Bomis]] corporation will be noticed and clarified, while those that do not, will not be.
Failing to distinguish ontological distinctions like "who are the [[trolls]]" from operational ones like "what IP numbers have been blocked in the past" is the basis of [[Wikimedia corruption]].  Those '''confusion'''s which serve the interests of [[Bomis]] corporation will be noticed and clarified, while those that do not, will not be.
9,842

edits