Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators
9,854
edits
Talk:Namespaces: Difference between revisions
m
practical stance on the namespaces needed
(namespaces can not be verbs, they have to be nouns. mmkay?) |
m (practical stance on the namespaces needed) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
--[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 20:25, 28 Aug 2005 (GMT) | --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 20:25, 28 Aug 2005 (GMT) | ||
And more - you (142) wrote the article [[wiki best practice]] that touts http://dowire.org/wiki/Wiki_best_practice as the best in "best practice" and in there we find http://dowire.org/wiki/Avoid_new_namespaces . Now what is the coherence in that that you are pushing for 7 namespaces for recording [[policies]], [[guidelines]] and [[help]] reagarding the way that Consumerium is run. | |||
I repeat that verbs are not going to be used as namespaces. I tried it already (to keep the project-namespace in accordance with the domain-name), but it was just plain confusing and not a good practice. | |||
The namespaces we are going to have are going to be in the manner of | |||
*[[Company:]] and [[Product:]] (though one of these will be most likely discarded because the content goes into the main namespace) (my current tingling is that the products will go to the main namespace) | |||
*[[GTIN:]], [[EAN:]] and [[UPC:]] --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 20:37, 28 Aug 2005 (GMT) | |||
---- | ---- | ||