Please sign and share the petition 'Tighten regulation on taking, making and faking explicit images' at Change.org initiated by Helen Mort to the w:Law Commission (England and Wales) to properly update UK laws against synthetic filth. Only name and email required to support, no nationality requirement. See Current and possible laws and their application @ #SSF! wiki for more info on the struggle for laws to protect humans.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Guidelines for claiming corruption cases in Research Wiki"

From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(usefulness)
 
(fix link)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
If human garbage that has actually made friends with [[Wikimedia]] will back off, these guidelines can be improved to being actually useful.  The case of [[alleged Wikimedia corruption]] and involvement of [[Bomis]] in subverting any attempt to create an [[independent board]] is an excellent [[Resarch Wiki pilot]] [[test case]], and when the [[Research Wiki]] exists, this case can be among the very first it deals with.  Advantages of that include:
+
If human garbage that has actually made friends with [[Wikimedia]] will back off, these guidelines can be improved to being actually useful.  The case of [[alleged Wikimedia corruption]] and involvement of [[Bomis]] in subverting any attempt to create an [[independent board]] is an excellent [[Consumerium Research pilot]] [[test case]], and when the [[Research Wiki]] exists, this case can be among the very first it deals with.  Advantages of that include:
  
 
*Expanding [[TIPAESA]] form to better model [[adversarial process]]es such as [[libel chill]] and [[perjury]] claims, which are going to be common in the actual operation of [[Consumerium Services]] (see [[Chief Editor]] especially)
 
*Expanding [[TIPAESA]] form to better model [[adversarial process]]es such as [[libel chill]] and [[perjury]] claims, which are going to be common in the actual operation of [[Consumerium Services]] (see [[Chief Editor]] especially)

Latest revision as of 21:27, 9 September 2004

If human garbage that has actually made friends with Wikimedia will back off, these guidelines can be improved to being actually useful. The case of alleged Wikimedia corruption and involvement of Bomis in subverting any attempt to create an independent board is an excellent Consumerium Research pilot test case, and when the Research Wiki exists, this case can be among the very first it deals with. Advantages of that include:

  • Once and for all getting the truth about Wikimedia and its lies exposed; dissecting an enemy project in full view of everyone who has criticized it or supported it - which is just what we will do to McDonald's or Coca-Cola or Exxon or Monsanto, and which we must be ready to do without hesitation even to "friends".