Search results
- ...1, but when you see more than one or two reverts, WITHOUT third and fourth parties sharing the burden of reverting, you KNOW this is not the case, and that it2 KB (280 words) - 13:55, 4 March 2004
- Apparently such licenses are used within [[Green Parties]] and some clauses of this nature exist in some contracts, e.g. [[WarFTP]]'1 KB (193 words) - 10:03, 24 November 2003
- ...t]]s, each sprint producing an executable. Between sprints, all interested parties evaluate progress and reevaluate technical and business requirements. Work1 KB (217 words) - 04:00, 22 February 2004
- ...transaction]] is deemed to be agreeable and ultimately acceptable by all [[parties]]. To be considered '''fair''', a [[transaction|transactions]] must be see1 KB (203 words) - 18:50, 7 June 2003
- ...[[community]], [[governance]] and even useful [[groupthink]] (factions or parties simplifying [[discourse]] on governance questions) to enhance the life of a Likewise, many parties in Consumerium, including those "targetted" by it, can benefit because:3 KB (481 words) - 16:09, 6 April 2024
- ...to quickly and simply correct, to [[be bold]] in making changes - so that parties with a political motive to accuse contributors of "being vandals" don't not2 KB (265 words) - 22:05, 7 January 2004
- ...e]]" in a contractual relationship, actively attempting to get one or more parties to breach a contract1 KB (237 words) - 03:18, 16 February 2004
- ===Do you want to make some additional information available to other parties?=== ...e you better. Do you wish to give some information to one or more of these parties?'' '''A confirmation-challenge email will be sent to your email address if4 KB (675 words) - 17:11, 2 December 2003
- ...two-party system''' develops. Formal [[faction]]s in and out of these two parties jockey for control of the [[consensus]] and the [[dissensus]] within each p1 KB (231 words) - 22:37, 3 March 2004
- ...ly, due process includes and is served by an [[adversarial process]] where parties present their cases in a neutral form and stick to the facts. ''See [[142.2 KB (272 words) - 03:58, 16 February 2004
- To do so the Green [[Governance Organization]] ([[Green Parties]] or [[nonprofit]] [[Consortium]] holding the patents for them) would agree2 KB (319 words) - 02:08, 25 November 2003
- ...e/[[Workplace Upgrade]] Request/message - these will be distributed to all parties2 KB (247 words) - 21:50, 27 September 2006
- ...m can be made to work? If so you're a pink! (OK by this definition [[Green Parties]] are pinks, use your judgement)2 KB (324 words) - 06:14, 15 August 2004
- ...ance, those concepts favoured in the [[mass media]] or by ruling political parties, will almost certainly be strongly favoured in the distribution of [[sysop2 KB (318 words) - 20:57, 25 December 2003
- ...al asset]]; permit energy and material savings to be invested in by third parties separately, as a different type of "savings bond", letting them share in th2 KB (238 words) - 04:05, 17 July 2003
- * '''Secure''' for both parties ([[Consumer]] and [[Retailer]])2 KB (249 words) - 09:58, 15 October 2003
- ...flection of the comprehensive outcome - noting the gains and losses to all parties involved, not just those investing or purchasing. Such moves have made [[m3 KB (406 words) - 17:08, 13 December 2003
- ...ecology-focused NGOs like [[Greenpeace]] and [[Earth First]], and [[Green Parties]] which tend to monitor both production and consumption closely in [[develo2 KB (386 words) - 21:27, 20 November 2003
- *[[Greens]] are the most politically organized, into [[Green Parties]] sharing the [[six principles]] and [[fair trade]]3 KB (407 words) - 21:55, 24 November 2003
- ...under the supervision of an [[independent board]] would potentially elect parties to the following roles that require extreme judgement:2 KB (377 words) - 18:09, 9 September 2004