Search results

  • ...1, but when you see more than one or two reverts, WITHOUT third and fourth parties sharing the burden of reverting, you KNOW this is not the case, and that it
    2 KB (280 words) - 13:55, 4 March 2004
  • Apparently such licenses are used within [[Green Parties]] and some clauses of this nature exist in some contracts, e.g. [[WarFTP]]'
    1 KB (193 words) - 10:03, 24 November 2003
  • ...t]]s, each sprint producing an executable. Between sprints, all interested parties evaluate progress and reevaluate technical and business requirements. Work
    1 KB (217 words) - 04:00, 22 February 2004
  • ...transaction]] is deemed to be agreeable and ultimately acceptable by all [[parties]]. To be considered '''fair''', a [[transaction|transactions]] must be see
    1 KB (203 words) - 18:50, 7 June 2003
  • ...[[community]], [[governance]] and even useful [[groupthink]] (factions or parties simplifying [[discourse]] on governance questions) to enhance the life of a Likewise, many parties in Consumerium, including those "targetted" by it, can benefit because:
    3 KB (481 words) - 16:09, 6 April 2024
  • ...to quickly and simply correct, to [[be bold]] in making changes - so that parties with a political motive to accuse contributors of "being vandals" don't not
    2 KB (265 words) - 22:05, 7 January 2004
  • ...e]]" in a contractual relationship, actively attempting to get one or more parties to breach a contract
    1 KB (237 words) - 03:18, 16 February 2004
  • ===Do you want to make some additional information available to other parties?=== ...e you better. Do you wish to give some information to one or more of these parties?'' '''A confirmation-challenge email will be sent to your email address if
    4 KB (675 words) - 17:11, 2 December 2003
  • ...two-party system''' develops. Formal [[faction]]s in and out of these two parties jockey for control of the [[consensus]] and the [[dissensus]] within each p
    1 KB (231 words) - 22:37, 3 March 2004
  • ...ly, due process includes and is served by an [[adversarial process]] where parties present their cases in a neutral form and stick to the facts. ''See [[142.
    2 KB (272 words) - 03:58, 16 February 2004
  • To do so the Green [[Governance Organization]] ([[Green Parties]] or [[nonprofit]] [[Consortium]] holding the patents for them) would agree
    2 KB (319 words) - 02:08, 25 November 2003
  • ...e/[[Workplace Upgrade]] Request/message - these will be distributed to all parties
    2 KB (247 words) - 21:50, 27 September 2006
  • ...m can be made to work? If so you're a pink! (OK by this definition [[Green Parties]] are pinks, use your judgement)
    2 KB (324 words) - 06:14, 15 August 2004
  • ...ance, those concepts favoured in the [[mass media]] or by ruling political parties, will almost certainly be strongly favoured in the distribution of [[sysop
    2 KB (318 words) - 20:57, 25 December 2003
  • ...al asset]]; permit energy and material savings to be invested in by third parties separately, as a different type of "savings bond", letting them share in th
    2 KB (238 words) - 04:05, 17 July 2003
  • * '''Secure''' for both parties ([[Consumer]] and [[Retailer]])
    2 KB (249 words) - 09:58, 15 October 2003
  • ...flection of the comprehensive outcome - noting the gains and losses to all parties involved, not just those investing or purchasing. Such moves have made [[m
    3 KB (406 words) - 17:08, 13 December 2003
  • ...ecology-focused NGOs like [[Greenpeace]] and [[Earth First]], and [[Green Parties]] which tend to monitor both production and consumption closely in [[develo
    2 KB (386 words) - 21:27, 20 November 2003
  • *[[Greens]] are the most politically organized, into [[Green Parties]] sharing the [[six principles]] and [[fair trade]]
    3 KB (407 words) - 21:55, 24 November 2003
  • ...under the supervision of an [[independent board]] would potentially elect parties to the following roles that require extreme judgement:
    2 KB (377 words) - 18:09, 9 September 2004
View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)