Guidelines for claiming corruption cases in Research Wiki: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    (initial guidelines for registering corruption cases in research wiki pilot)
     
    (clarify a bit)
    Line 12: Line 12:
    *It is recomendable to use [[TIPAESA]] structure in filing the claims
    *It is recomendable to use [[TIPAESA]] structure in filing the claims


    *False and Unsubstantiated claims are moved to [[False or unsubstantiated claims of corruption]]
    *False and Unsubstantiated claims are moved to [[False or unsubstantiated claims of corruption]] where they are stated as being either [[False claim]] (proof required) or [[Unsubstantiated claim]] (showing that there is no fact to substantiate the claim is enough of proof)


    Please refrain from stating corruption cases in the [[Development Wiki]] for the legal threat posed by such claims takes up our efforts and time which would be much better spent on solving the practical issues.
    Please refrain from stating corruption cases in the [[Development Wiki]] for the legal threat posed by such claims takes up our efforts and time which would be much better spent on solving the practical issues.

    Revision as of 14:12, 9 September 2004

    Claims of corruption are filed in the following way:

    in the article Claims of corruption or COC

    • Claim: Party (company, organisation, country, official or institution): General description of corruption claimed (name of the claim).
    • Larger description of claimed corruption
    • Jurisdiction (if applicable)
    • References and Proof.
    • Filed by and Filed date

    Please refrain from stating corruption cases in the Development Wiki for the legal threat posed by such claims takes up our efforts and time which would be much better spent on solving the practical issues.