Search results

  • ...possible only for these two individuals, Moeller and Starling, to rig the votes. ''See [[Disinfopedia]] entries on [http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml ...the SQL DB hides the order in which votes were cast, which is why to track votes one would need to monitor every transaction as it occurred.
    11 KB (1,936 words) - 13:40, 9 September 2004
  • ...that there is some [[factionally defined]] system of agreeing on [[edits, votes and bets]] they make ...noise" into [[Consumerium:intermediate page]]s that they sign and [[edits, votes and bets|somehow stake something on so we know they believe it]]. The nois
    5 KB (798 words) - 22:02, 21 March 2004
  • ...whether a possibly-unnecessary vote will go a certain way. Thus annoyance votes and annoyance edits can be heavily discouraged - and those who know what's ...th a known troll profile, that they are probably the same person with many votes or accounts.
    11 KB (1,748 words) - 16:51, 5 August 2004
  • <br />[12:34] juxho> that it was impossible to link to [[...Votes]] from some Talk-page ...t a two avg()'s in the begining: One for direct votes and one for indirect votes
    9 KB (1,423 words) - 15:23, 6 July 2017
  • ...s. Another ratio is naturally the positive/total and negative/total public votes.
    7 KB (1,064 words) - 15:23, 6 July 2017
  • [[Campaigns]] and [[TCE|Votes]] will accept input from [[web form]]s, and maybe [[comment]]s, but even th
    3 KB (396 words) - 18:48, 27 August 2005
  • ...ome if I'm understanding this right. To keep the historical history of the votes is key. The [[MediaWiki]] already keeps full history of edits. --[[User:Ju
    2 KB (252 words) - 22:54, 27 February 2019
  • 3 KB (459 words) - 04:04, 4 December 2003
  • 1 KB (256 words) - 15:23, 6 July 2017
  • ...cial media game we must give users the ability to reveal sub-sets of their votes to different audiences. Voters must apparently be assigned an ID to enable
    2 KB (223 words) - 15:23, 6 July 2017
  • ...- the /wiki/ subspace indicating articles amenable to wiki based [[edits, votes and bets|editing]]. There may be other spaces for /print/ or a non-wiki /e
    4 KB (630 words) - 15:12, 5 June 2005
  • [[Abe Sokolov]] listed it on votes for deletion, which is not supposed to apply to user pages, but no matter -
    2 KB (319 words) - 01:45, 12 May 2012
  • Here [[edits, votes and bets]] may be resolved and maybe disputed by formal [[faction]]s, by [[
    2 KB (320 words) - 15:58, 24 April 2012
  • ...ainst each other to prevent it. By agreeing say to one regime of [[edits, votes and bets]] that was "democratic enough" for them to accept as a condition o ...ch Wiki]] is [[Opinion Wiki]] and supports the [[faction]]s using [[edits, votes and bets]] to battle out what is "true enough to publish" to the [[web user
    8 KB (1,326 words) - 17:49, 5 March 2004
  • <br/>juxho> so the DB hides the order in which votes were cast or what? ...g> also, an election administrator may use this list to strike out invalid votes
    8 KB (1,386 words) - 15:23, 6 July 2017
  • ...here sysops tend to delete things with no process at all, and ignore the [[votes for deletion]] process that non-sysops are required to go through. ''This
    4 KB (722 words) - 15:54, 24 January 2005
  • ...on log]] to record what has been deleted, and a [[pending deletions]] or [[votes for deletion]] page to debate what may be deleted. This is true even on th
    3 KB (435 words) - 13:40, 12 April 2021
  • We should be more concerned with [[edits, votes and bets]] and how [[answer recommendation]] might move things from [[Resea
    5 KB (753 words) - 13:39, 9 September 2004
  • ...by [[paid trolls]] like voting positive on Nestlé, Shell and so and if the votes are anonymized we can't go and tell them that we have a problem with someon
    3 KB (426 words) - 15:23, 6 July 2017
  • ...ce of failures of the code, that may be evidence of deliberate ditching of votes.
    5 KB (877 words) - 12:49, 19 May 2010
View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)