User contributions for 142.177.81.73
24 November 2003
- 21:4421:44, 24 November 2003 diff hist +2,472 Blues same invite as for Reds current
- 21:4221:42, 24 November 2003 diff hist +1,081 N Copyright 20 years of history jammed on one page
- 21:3921:39, 24 November 2003 diff hist +658 N Trademark No edit summary
- 21:3821:38, 24 November 2003 diff hist +373 N Patent No edit summary
- 21:3621:36, 24 November 2003 diff hist +2,800 Reds restoring with note - basically, a non-Red should not edit this page now, it should be up to Reds to define
- 21:3321:33, 24 November 2003 diff hist −5,962 Political spectrum short summary list
- 21:3121:31, 24 November 2003 diff hist +6,786 N Political spectrum archiving whole article
- 21:3021:30, 24 November 2003 diff hist −6,728 Silly colorology redirect to correct name current
- 21:2921:29, 24 November 2003 diff hist +58 N Talk:Mandatory patent license No edit summary
- 21:2821:28, 24 November 2003 diff hist +131 Mandatory patent license CGO decides... current
- 21:2621:26, 24 November 2003 diff hist +443 Viral license required reintegration *is* a part of making a license viral - without it, new software under new licenses can be produced, thus making the original license not apply
- 21:2221:22, 24 November 2003 diff hist +36 N Green software license redirect proper noun - if the Green Parties or Greenpeace or both do this, there will be only one such license, and that's when we'll care about it current
- 21:2221:22, 24 November 2003 diff hist +95 Open source the main "added restriction" people care about is required reintegration current
- 21:1921:19, 24 November 2003 diff hist +507 Talk:Governance organization agreed current
- 21:1721:17, 24 November 2003 diff hist +162 Mandatory patent license No edit summary
- 21:1521:15, 24 November 2003 diff hist +875 Mandatory patent license the note here has nothing to do with what a mandatory patent license actually IS, so this is now explained independently of the Consortium licenses you find it in - see talk for response tho
- 21:1121:11, 24 November 2003 diff hist +1,360 Talk:142.177.X.X if anything we don't have ENOUGH open links, and yes, it's time to consolidate, and am doing rewrites to clarify things causing confusion
- 21:0521:05, 24 November 2003 diff hist +907 N License what it is, why we care
- 21:0221:02, 24 November 2003 diff hist +37 N Governance Organization redir current
- 21:0121:01, 24 November 2003 diff hist +684 N Governance organization best practices list eventually...
- 20:5920:59, 24 November 2003 diff hist +515 N Consortium No edit summary current
- 20:5720:57, 24 November 2003 diff hist +331 N Richard Stallman short bios of extremely influential thinkers is better than sending people off at random without warning to Wikipedia to wade through tons of crap without realizing why they're reading it
- 20:5520:55, 24 November 2003 diff hist +146 Bad copy problem restoring links to people/concepts already defined or must be defined here
- 20:5220:52, 24 November 2003 diff hist +1,103 N Improvement what it is legally, why it matters
- 20:4820:48, 24 November 2003 diff hist +636 N Open source clarifying its relationship to other options
- 20:4520:45, 24 November 2003 diff hist +32 N Java consortium redirect - Java consortium notably mostly for how it exploits trademark to enforce its consortium license current
- 20:4420:44, 24 November 2003 diff hist +32 N Mandatory patent license redir
- 20:4320:43, 24 November 2003 diff hist +1 Consortium license restoring necessary links; implications of patent law and general examples of good Governance organizations need discussion here current
- 20:4020:40, 24 November 2003 diff hist +456 Viral license more exact reasoning why required reintegration is the core issue and a better term to use in almost all cases than "viral"
- 20:3620:36, 24 November 2003 diff hist +1,905 Blues this is as close as we get to defining "the enemy" for now, and this is important to identify their key ideas
- 20:3420:34, 24 November 2003 diff hist +2,735 Greens trolls especially bite you on the leg for censoring this one
- 20:3020:30, 24 November 2003 diff hist +686 Pinks same story, either you let them take over all definitions without noticing, or you give them a faction
- 20:2920:29, 24 November 2003 diff hist +2,361 Reds you're wrong, this is a faction and they will fight at every level to express their values in the system - either you CHOOSE the level they factionally define things, or they mess up everythin