Talk:Develop:itself: Difference between revisions

Line 1:

142, you've falled behind from the technology we have at hand. Like if there are a set of pages that deal with some '''issue in common to them all''' it imho definatelly be [[wiki best practice]] to use a category for connecting those pages.

:Not necessarily. Not if there is no [[wikitext standard]] way to do this across all major wikis. Just [[mediawiki]] alone is not enough. Stupid link converters can deal with [[link to this page]], but it takes a lot more to deal with [[categories]] as a whole.

Also navigational [[Templates]] could be put to good use to simplify getting a good picture of the whole issue that involves many pages. See [[w:Wikipedia:Navigational_templates]] for those --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 19:35, 27 Aug 2005 (GMT)

:That might be so. But again there is no standard.

:And if [[tikiwiki]] and [[tiddlywiki]] are still options, and I think they are, then, it is dangerous to rely on mediawiki's latest features.

:Besides there is no agreement yet at [[talk:categories]] on the existing ones that you proposed, some of which are fine, some of which are bogus or just have errors in names.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 , you've falled behind from the technology we have at hand. Like if there are a set of pages that deal with some '''issue in common to them all''' it imho definatelly be [[wiki best practice]] to use a category for connecting those pages.
+:Not necessarily.  Not if there is no [[wikitext standard]] way to do this across all major wikis.  Just [[mediawiki]] alone is not enough.  Stupid link converters can deal with [[link to this page]], but it takes a lot more to deal with [[categories]] as a whole.
 Also navigational [[Templates]] could be put to good use to simplify getting a good picture of the whole issue that involves many pages. See [[w:Wikipedia:Navigational_templates]] for those --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 19:35, 27 Aug 2005 (GMT)
+:That might be so.  But again there is no standard.
+:And if [[tikiwiki]] and [[tiddlywiki]] are still options, and I think they are, then, it is dangerous to rely on mediawiki's latest features.
+:Besides there is no agreement yet at [[talk:categories]] on the existing ones that you proposed, some of which are fine, some of which are bogus or just have errors in names.