Talk:Develop:itself: Difference between revisions

I think it'd be much more handy to use a Category (2-way links, remember) the link to this page (which propably was wiki best practice before categories were introduced)
 
mediawiki's categories and templates aren't wikitext standard, minimize reliance on them, unless/until mediawiki dependence forever has been decided on -which it hasn't, e.g. tiddlywiki
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
142, you've falled behind from the technology we have at hand. Like if there are a set of pages that deal with some '''issue in common to them all''' it imho definatelly be [[wiki best practice]] to use a category for connecting those pages.
142, you've falled behind from the technology we have at hand. Like if there are a set of pages that deal with some '''issue in common to them all''' it imho definatelly be [[wiki best practice]] to use a category for connecting those pages.


Also navigational [[Templates]] could be put to good use to simplify getting a good picture of the whole issue that involves many pages. See [w:Wikipedia:Navigational_templates]] for those --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 19:35, 27 Aug 2005 (GMT)
:Not necessarily.  Not if there is no [[wikitext standard]] way to do this across all major wikis.  Just [[mediawiki]] alone is not enough.  Stupid link converters can deal with [[link to this page]], but it takes a lot more to deal with [[categories]] as a whole.
 
Also navigational [[Templates]] could be put to good use to simplify getting a good picture of the whole issue that involves many pages. See [[w:Wikipedia:Navigational_templates]] for those --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 19:35, 27 Aug 2005 (GMT)
 
:That might be so.  But again there is no standard.
 
:And if [[tikiwiki]] and [[tiddlywiki]] are still options, and I think they are, then, it is dangerous to rely on mediawiki's latest features.
 
:Besides there is no agreement yet at [[talk:categories]] on the existing ones that you proposed, some of which are fine, some of which are bogus or just have errors in names.
Return to "Develop:itself" page.