Talk:Develop:itself: Difference between revisions
I think it'd be much more handy to use a Category (2-way links, remember) the link to this page (which propably was wiki best practice before categories were introduced) |
mediawiki's categories and templates aren't wikitext standard, minimize reliance on them, unless/until mediawiki dependence forever has been decided on -which it hasn't, e.g. tiddlywiki |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
142, you've falled behind from the technology we have at hand. Like if there are a set of pages that deal with some '''issue in common to them all''' it imho definatelly be [[wiki best practice]] to use a category for connecting those pages. | 142, you've falled behind from the technology we have at hand. Like if there are a set of pages that deal with some '''issue in common to them all''' it imho definatelly be [[wiki best practice]] to use a category for connecting those pages. | ||
Also navigational [[Templates]] could be put to good use to simplify getting a good picture of the whole issue that involves many pages. See [w:Wikipedia:Navigational_templates]] for those --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 19:35, 27 Aug 2005 (GMT) | :Not necessarily. Not if there is no [[wikitext standard]] way to do this across all major wikis. Just [[mediawiki]] alone is not enough. Stupid link converters can deal with [[link to this page]], but it takes a lot more to deal with [[categories]] as a whole. | ||
Also navigational [[Templates]] could be put to good use to simplify getting a good picture of the whole issue that involves many pages. See [[w:Wikipedia:Navigational_templates]] for those --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 19:35, 27 Aug 2005 (GMT) | |||
:That might be so. But again there is no standard. | |||
:And if [[tikiwiki]] and [[tiddlywiki]] are still options, and I think they are, then, it is dangerous to rely on mediawiki's latest features. | |||
:Besides there is no agreement yet at [[talk:categories]] on the existing ones that you proposed, some of which are fine, some of which are bogus or just have errors in names. | |||