Simple Trollish: Difference between revisions
(troll equivalent terms to eradicate philosophy as usual) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*[[scientific method]] - ''which trolls improve to [[scienterrific myehod]]'' | *[[scientific method]] - ''which trolls improve to [[scienterrific myehod]]'' | ||
*[[knowledge]] - ''which trolls [[gnaw]] down into [[some body]] [[gnawlij]]'' | *[[knowledge]] - ''which trolls [[gnaw]] down into [[some body]] [[gnawlij]]'' | ||
*[[truth]] - ''which trolls | *[[truth]] - ''which trolls [[defer]] to the [[world tree]]'' | ||
*[[neutral point of view]] - ''see [[New Troll point of view]]'' | *[[neutral point of view]] - ''see [[New Troll point of view]]'' | ||
*[[ethics]] - ''see [[moral order]]'' | *[[ethics]] - ''see [[moral order]]'' |
Revision as of 06:59, 10 August 2004
Some people have trouble understanding trollish. The Meta-Wikipedia's list of articles all languages should have includes the following required to understand "philosophy":
- scientific method - which trolls improve to scienterrific myehod
- knowledge - which trolls gnaw down into some body gnawlij
- truth - which trolls defer to the world tree
- neutral point of view - see New Troll point of view
- ethics - see moral order
- politics - see politics as usual
- ontology - see some body versus no body
- consensus decision making - see gnawing
- trolling - see heroic trolling and magnificent trolling
Accordingly, a Simple Trollish encyclopedia must explain all of these and their trollish equivalents. Consumerium defines the above from a New Troll point of view - a much more accurate way to view these things than a "philosophy" could ever be.
ok, you are right, trolling was not listed, but really philosophy is just a form of trolling, so it should be there!