POVs: Difference between revisions
m (bolding one link) |
(The above should be edited to take into account How Consumerium differs from Wikipedia in a nutshell. ) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Some [[trolls]] argue that [[NPOV]] is really just '''[[Community point of view]]''' in the best case and [[Sysop Vandal point of view]] in the worst case. | Some [[trolls]] argue that [[NPOV]] is really just '''[[Community point of view]]''' in the best case and [[Sysop Vandal point of view]] in the worst case. | ||
'''The above should be edited to take into account [[How Consumerium differs from Wikipedia in a nutshell]].''' | |||
Latest revision as of 14:03, 23 September 2004
There is not yet a decision on what (or which) Point of View(s) should be applied to provide reliable and user friendly Consumerium Services
Many of these following articles are not to be taken seriously though they as a whole offer a view into the problems of deciding and unbiasedly enforcing a policy that is required
- Neutral point of view (NPOV) (applied at Wikipedia) versus Non-neutral point of view (NNPOV) - this is sysopism
- New Troll point of view versus NPOV - this is trollist
- Multiple point of view (factionally defined) reconciled by some system like answer recommendation, with Consensual point of view of processes required to generate Consumerium buying signal
- Critical point of view versus Sympathetic point of view (applied at Wikinfo) (This is a redirect to Consensus)
Some trolls argue that NPOV is really just Community point of view in the best case and Sysop Vandal point of view in the worst case.
The above should be edited to take into account How Consumerium differs from Wikipedia in a nutshell.