'''Opinion change is a [[feature]] of an [[campaign]]'''
...ges. If a certain proportion of the [[campaigner]]s call for a [[vote]] on opinion change such a vote will be arranged and as a result a "fierce" call for [[b
571 bytes (98 words) - 00:39, 2 June 2003
...sest anyone has come so far. Accordingly we might ask [[Fred Bauder]] his opinion on this question:
...n a [[Publish Wiki]] will always contain a lot of what some people call "[[opinion]]".
750 bytes (121 words) - 16:55, 5 August 2004
#REDIRECT [[Opinion Wiki]]
26 bytes (3 words) - 21:27, 18 October 2003
*[[Opinion Wiki]]
**[[Opinion change]]
558 bytes (81 words) - 13:42, 12 April 2021
It's not clear who has worse no-body-expressing-opinion problems, Metaweb or Consumerium, but, whichever does, should set the stand
397 bytes (64 words) - 17:00, 17 October 2003
'''The [[Consumerium]] Exchange''' is where people can voice their opinion on which [[disputed article]] or [[campaign]] is closest to the [[truth]] a
...combined measurement for different opinions, which determines the default opinion shown to the [[consumer]] on each issue.
4 KB (656 words) - 01:16, 25 June 2004
'''Funded troll'''s are paid to change opinions in the [[Opinion Wiki]] or alter the way that the project works in ways that favour those wh
...s seems really unlikely if [[marketing]] starts to depend heavily on the [[Opinion Wiki]] here or other traits of [[Consumerium:Itself]].
2 KB (247 words) - 11:36, 11 July 2005
*[[Opinion Wiki]] - Where the campaigning is managed
701 bytes (108 words) - 20:36, 15 October 2003
...e DB of some 350 big companies with well researched information and public opinion
632 bytes (94 words) - 18:39, 21 September 2004
'''A Campaigner is someone who is participating in a [[Campaign]] in the [[Opinion Wiki]] by:'''
906 bytes (151 words) - 16:24, 4 November 2004
...ser]] vs. [[Verified User]]. ''Groups and VirtualGroups as described in [[Opinion Wiki]] '''may''' be implemented here, mostly likely as [[faction]]s and [[t
<small>'''Publish Wiki''' will take on the role of [[Opinion Wiki]], which was an ad-hoc development purpose name for discovering how [[
3 KB (396 words) - 18:48, 27 August 2005
...ganization]] will keep a close eye on sysops in the [[content wiki]] and [[opinion wiki]], and will govern them and give them more or less power depending sol
905 bytes (140 words) - 01:04, 8 September 2004
=== Content vs. opinion - where is neutrality possible? desirable? ===
...is disputed in the content wiki? Removing isolating disputed claims to [[Opinion Wiki]] circles is not enough.
4 KB (618 words) - 17:38, 2 July 2004
"Scenarios should include extremes and those that contradict popular opinion" - Algorithmics Inc., probably the world's most advanced scenario analysis
864 bytes (130 words) - 16:52, 25 November 2003
...is, rather than rely on [[Consumerium researchers]] exclusively for their opinion of say which [[standard label]]s were about to become important, it would b
1 KB (184 words) - 16:15, 24 November 2003
...specify how any [[improvement]] that is generated in the [[R&D wiki]] or [[opinion wiki]] or [[Consumerium maintenance]] etc. is to be documented, published,
1 KB (173 words) - 20:59, 24 November 2003
...se if they found information they had placed in a [[content wiki]] or an [[opinion wiki]] was being used in ways that was detrimental to their business or rep
1 KB (169 words) - 17:46, 22 November 2003
*[[faction]]s - representing differences of opinion within the system itself
1 KB (198 words) - 19:10, 9 April 2004
...the [[company]] in question and it's executives via [[Content Wiki]] and [[Opinion Wiki]].
545 bytes (80 words) - 11:50, 14 July 2012
Instead, Surowiecki's "Wise crowds" are described as having (1) diversity of opinion; (2) independence of members from one another; (3) decentralization; and (4
1 KB (225 words) - 21:58, 18 July 2004