Jump to content

Sourceforge: Difference between revisions

723 bytes removed ,  8 June 2003
m
no edit summary
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:


*SF seems to allow only one licence per project. Maybe we should split it into two SF projects [[XML]] and [[Executable]]s?
*SF seems to allow only one licence per project. Maybe we should split it into two SF projects [[XML]] and [[Executable]]s?
**Three - the [[XML DTD]] and an [[ASN.1]] minimal bitstream protocol which make the same data distinctions;  [[Executable]]s which implement this protocol and data model / [[schema]] / [[foundation ontology]];  [[Label data]] which can and must be consistently gathered and is what is subject to [[audit]] most often - there will be a need to withdraw support from labels that are just propaganda and say nothing about actual impact on real bodies.  We only need XML for now as all executables and labels data gathering will take place via very many means, one per faction say.  These may create their own [[consortium]] with their own [[consortium license]], e.g. [[Greens]] will not let weapons companies use theirs.


*Who leads the implementation process? I'm not really experienced enough to take charge of developing the actual software. My code is mediocre at it's best to be honest.
*Who leads the implementation process? I'm not really experienced enough to take charge of developing the actual software. My code is mediocre at it's best to be honest.
9,854

edits

We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.