Sourceforge: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(We should register with SF, but the license, the license....) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*The [[XML/DTD]]s are already under [[GPL]] but since I'm the only contributor to that section I can easily place them under some other licenses too | *The [[XML/DTD]]s are already under [[GPL]] but since I'm the only contributor to that section I can easily place them under some other licenses too | ||
*SF seems to allow only one | *SF seems to allow only one licence per project. Maybe we should split it into two SF projects [[XML]] and [[Executable]]s? | ||
**Three - the [[XML DTD]] and an [[ASN.1]] minimal bitstream protocol which make the same data distinctions; [[Executable]]s which implement this protocol and data model / [[schema]] / [[foundation ontology]]; [[Label data]] which can and must be consistently gathered and is what is subject to [[audit]] most often - there will be a need to withdraw support from labels that are just propaganda and say nothing about actual impact on real bodies. We only need XML for now as all executables and labels data gathering will take place via very many means, one per faction say. These may create their own [[consortium]] with their own [[consortium license]], e.g. [[Greens]] will not let weapons companies use theirs. | |||
*Who leads the implementation process? I'm not really experienced enough to take charge of developing the actual software. My code is mediocre at it's best to be honest. | *Who leads the implementation process? I'm not really experienced enough to take charge of developing the actual software. My code is mediocre at it's best to be honest. | ||
**That problem will solve itself if you get the license and XML schema good enough to create a self-improving protocol. There are many good coders, but they do not contribute to projects where others of different values are allowed to just do damage to their code or twist it to be useful to their enemies. All code is political. Look at WAR FTP if you want to see examples of quality that is produced by values consistency. That is ideal level of protocol coding... | |||
* .... | * .... | ||