Jump to content

International trade: Difference between revisions

m
typos
(defining scope)
m (typos)
Line 5: Line 5:
Also [[blues|pro-globalization]] people may be very strong advocates of [[w:protectionism]] when it comes to [[product group]]s that are seen as traditionally nationally important.  
Also [[blues|pro-globalization]] people may be very strong advocates of [[w:protectionism]] when it comes to [[product group]]s that are seen as traditionally nationally important.  


Many [[greens|ecologists]] people object to international trade on grounds that transportation of [[product]]s over long distances is not ecologically sane.  
Many [[greens|ecologists]] object to international trade on grounds that transportation of [[product]]s over long distances is not ecologically sane.  


There is also the [[reds|opposition]] based on distress caused to the local economical situation due to the fact that [[Multinational]] [[corporation]]s can move their production and [[capital]] around the globe quite quickly and use this possibility to negotiate or extort [[tax]] exemptions in countries that fear loss of [[employment]]
There is also the [[reds|opposition]] based on distress caused to the local economical situation due to the fact that [[Multinational]] [[corporation]]s can move their production and [[capital]] around the globe quite quickly and use this possibility to negotiate or extort [[tax]] exemptions in countries that fear the loss of [[employment]]


For the [[consumer]] international trade provides more [[moral choice|choice]] and reduced [[price]]s from increased competition.
For the [[consumer]] international trade provides more [[moral choice|choice]] and reduced [[price]]s from increased competition.
9,842

edits

We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.