Jump to content

User:Jukeboksi/Blog/September2004: Difference between revisions

don't assign label "false" based on one lying sysop's report, please, that is Sysop Vandal point of view not the more desirable New Troll point of view
(use my user page "email this user"-link if you must send urgent email. sorry for the inconvenience, but broken computer you know)
(don't assign label "false" based on one lying sysop's report, please, that is Sysop Vandal point of view not the more desirable New Troll point of view)
Line 1: Line 1:
:[[Trolls]] finally answered to all [[false or unsubstantiated claims of corruption|contested claims that are bogusly labelled false or unsubstantiated]] - both have clear evidence in their favour, and though there have been attempts to answer or clear up some of these, these are far from timely or satisfactory.  There remain many more [[alleged Wikimedia corruption]] issues than attempted resolutions.  The words of Mr. Wales in [[Talk:alleged Wikimedia corruption]] prove his [[libel chill]] attempt and his intent to censor anyone who publicly disagrees with him by name beyond a doubt.  So far all that you have done on this is to prove the trolls correct or at least very very right to be concerned.  So we thank [[Lowest Troll]] for that but ask that [[false or unsubstantiated claims of corruption|this page]] be renamed since it is named from [[Sysop Vandal point of view]] and should be from [[New Troll point of view]] like the rest of the [[Develop Wiki]].  There is an entire [[Meta-Wikipedia]] and half of [[Wikipedia]] devoted to lies about [[trolls]], every [[w:Votes for deletion]] argument that mentions trolls includes lies about them, so there is no need for more room for lies here.
---------
13.9.2004.
13.9.2004.


Anonymous user
We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.