Jump to content

Talk:Independent board: Difference between revisions

m
de-linking
(facts)
 
m (de-linking)
Line 1: Line 1:
The bad example is completely true, despite the false statement in the log - see [[Talk:Wikimedia corruption]].  It's entirely true to say that:
The bad example is completely true, despite the false statement in the log - see [[Talk:Wikimedia corruption]].  It's entirely true to say that:


Some, e.g. [[Wikimedia]], refuse to have such a [[board]], loading it instead with insiders, i.e. from [[Bomis]]. One reason to avoid having such a board is to ensure that "friendly" people are in charge if their pet projects are someday audited. Very reasonably, most people refuse to contribute large amounts to such groups who avoid scrutiny of truly independent directors.
Some, e.g. [[Wikimedia]], refuse to have such a [[board]], loading it instead with insiders, i.e. from Bomis. One reason to avoid having such a board is to ensure that "friendly" people are in charge if their pet projects are someday audited. Very reasonably, most people refuse to contribute large amounts to such groups who avoid scrutiny of truly independent directors.


Facts:
Facts:
9,842

edits

We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.