Talk:Article hub: Difference between revisions

Consider this:  all the [[troll]] research on [[Wikimedia]], [[Wikipedia]] and the way Bomis has created [[Wikimedia corruption]] is true.  But it would only be considered "opinion" by the [[usurper]]s who set up this situation.  In a court of law, every last thing said about Wikimedia here would be proven true, and it could be proven to be "research".  But in very few cases would anyone ever get around to such a decision:  in general, the difference between "opinion" and "research" is who you trust, i.e. which [[faction]], and if you have a bias towards [[trolls]] and the [[New Troll point of view]] or the [[sysop power structure]] and its invented idea of [[neutral point of view]], which means only "that which does not offend sysops so much that they ban those who challenge it" - in other words, [[systemic bias]] of [[insider culture]].