Talk:Subject-object problem: Difference between revisions
responding to misconceptions of rape and right to vanish
(rape is not a subject-object problem, it's a gross crime and if you feel that there is a priestly hierarchy somewhere imposing their god's eye view on others you can simply go somewhere else...) |
(responding to misconceptions of rape and right to vanish) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
One could as a less extreme example include the definition of [[trolls]] into existence by a [[priestly hierarchy]] of [[sysop]]s loyal to their [[GodKing]]. | One could as a less extreme example include the definition of [[trolls]] into existence by a [[priestly hierarchy]] of [[sysop]]s loyal to their [[GodKing]]. | ||
-------- | |||
Some think that rape is not a subject-object problem, it's a gross crime that is just randomly done 99% by men on women in societies where women are subject to [[objectification]] via [[advertising]] etc. This is not what [[w:feminism|feminist critics]] tend to believe. | |||
Others feel that if there is a priestly hierarchy somewhere imposing their god's eye view on others one can simply go somewhere else... This is often quite possible, but not when there is only one [[GFDL corpuos access provider]] claiming the right to have [[link-back]]s only to its own version of articles, e.g. [[Wikimedia corruption]], grossly inflating itself in the [[google count]]. In these circumstances one can't "leave" but actually has to "fight". | |||