Talk:MediaWiki modifications: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(anwers to your nagging and madness) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::Whaddefuck?You want to contirbants be depended on M$ Internet Esplorer. You are not sane you troll. I havent looked into what xforms actually is but from the name i guess it's nothing special that can't be done with cleaver HTML Forms. But hey whaddoiknow. I'll look into the issue. | :::Whaddefuck?You want to contirbants be depended on M$ Internet Esplorer. You are not sane you troll. I havent looked into what xforms actually is but from the name i guess it's nothing special that can't be done with cleaver HTML Forms. But hey whaddoiknow. I'll look into the issue. | ||
:::XForms' main advantages are (a) multi-page forms that can be dug through without server interaction, submitting the whole thing back at once, and ending that "page expired" problem. (b) separating purpose of a form from style and (c) submitting the actual <instance> </instance> as XML. But IE doesn't do this yet. What IE does right now is work very well with XML, and a lot of people standardize on it only for that. | |||
*The linkage visualization (map) thing seems very interesting | *The linkage visualization (map) thing seems very interesting | ||
| Line 13: | Line 15: | ||
::No, that's wrong. Look at the MediaWiki user base - mostly at Wikipedia. These people do group management very very badly and freezing their bad ideas about it into code will make it worse. For years they have very serious governance problems, there are always big troll fights and "regime change" debates and flame wars, and "pogroms" and "witchhunts" and "purges". Comments on "what's really wrong" get censored by a group that doesn't want to hear it. | ::No, that's wrong. Look at the MediaWiki user base - mostly at Wikipedia. These people do group management very very badly and freezing their bad ideas about it into code will make it worse. For years they have very serious governance problems, there are always big troll fights and "regime change" debates and flame wars, and "pogroms" and "witchhunts" and "purges". Comments on "what's really wrong" get censored by a group that doesn't want to hear it. | ||
:::They just believe the plurality of contributors will keep the project alive well. the groups they have being: | :::They just believe the plurality of contributors will keep the project alive well. | ||
::::So, they have no actual concept of how responsibilities break down, other than this: | |||
:::the groups they have being: | |||
:::*Anonymous | :::*Anonymous | ||
:::*User | :::*User | ||
:::*Sysop | :::*Sysop | ||
:::*Developer | :::*Developer | ||
::::You forget, when anonymous offends sysop, it becomes [[troll]]. LOL! And there is no [[editor]] or [[lawyer]] which there might have to be soon. | |||
:::I'll describe how nearly unlimited amount of Groups can be implemented in MediaWiki without any major modifications when I feel up to it. It's not really a problem IMHO. | :::I'll describe how nearly unlimited amount of Groups can be implemented in MediaWiki without any major modifications when I feel up to it. It's not really a problem IMHO. | ||