Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators
9,854
edits
(nothing disputed here, the vandalbot attacks were clearly technological, and there is only one technology to do that to mediawiki, and Tim Starling developed it) |
(mv the recyclopedia attacks para fully to talk page, leaving the first sentence of it here.) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
It's original stated goal was to let any user [[undelete page]]s, making [[ad hominem delete]] no worse a problem than [[ad hominem revert]]. Without this special power to prevent their opponents from reading the alternative view, it is thought, [[sysop power structure]] will not form at all. Apparently it has not lived up to this goal fully. | It's original stated goal was to let any user [[undelete page]]s, making [[ad hominem delete]] no worse a problem than [[ad hominem revert]]. Without this special power to prevent their opponents from reading the alternative view, it is thought, [[sysop power structure]] will not form at all. Apparently it has not lived up to this goal fully. | ||
The Anarchopedia's policy effort builds on prior efforts at [[Recyclopedia]] - an attempt to build a [[large public wiki]] without use of [[sysop]] powers at all. | The Anarchopedia's policy effort builds on prior efforts at [[Recyclopedia]] - an attempt to build a [[large public wiki]] without use of [[sysop]] powers at all. | ||
By contrast, '''Anarchopedia''' seems not only to embrace but seek to extend the [[NTPOV]] to all aspects of [[wiki governance]] and [[wiki management]]. There are no [[vile mailing list]]s and no [[cabal]] of friends with [[infrastructure owners trust]] as there is at [[Wikipedia]]. | By contrast, '''Anarchopedia''' seems not only to embrace but seek to extend the [[NTPOV]] to all aspects of [[wiki governance]] and [[wiki management]]. There are no [[vile mailing list]]s and no [[cabal]] of friends with [[infrastructure owners trust]] as there is at [[Wikipedia]]. | ||
It is also notable for embracing a [[one wiki model]]. It has some problems addressing [[language vs. area]] specializations. | It is also notable for embracing a [[one wiki model]]. It has some problems addressing [[language vs. area]] specializations. |