Jump to content

Infrastructure owners trust: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(mv last para to talk page)
No edit summary
 
Line 2: Line 2:


The [[Wikimedia Board of Trustees]] for instance is 3/5 Bomis employees and has only two token females of non-American origin who have no power whatsoever, not even being consulted in such decisions as how to deal with the [[Red China block]], which the still-reigning [[GodKing]] chooses to deal with unilaterally via the "[[usual happy NPOV talk]]".  ''See also [[Wikimedia corruption]].''
The [[Wikimedia Board of Trustees]] for instance is 3/5 Bomis employees and has only two token females of non-American origin who have no power whatsoever, not even being consulted in such decisions as how to deal with the [[Red China block]], which the still-reigning [[GodKing]] chooses to deal with unilaterally via the "[[usual happy NPOV talk]]".  ''See also [[Wikimedia corruption]].''
[[Distributed Consumerium]] will actually not be dependent on any one owners' trust regarding central [[Consumerium Services]], since, it will run on widely distributed computers run by just anyone. 
However, the [[friendly retail]] locations will still be critically important and without their trust, it is a lot more difficult to deploy the [[Consumerium buying signal]].  So the focus for gaining this '''trust''' should be there, not on pleasing the various owners of infrastructure.
Anonymous user
We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.