Talk:Wikinfo: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(how does this multi-licensing work in practice?) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:How does this work out in practice. I suppose that if an article consists of [[GFDL]]'d and [[CC]] texts it is not applicable to maintain the texts discrete of each other thus resulting in CC texts being subliminated into GFDL, which AFIK is a violation of both [[licenses]] | :How does this work out in practice. I suppose that if an article consists of [[GFDL]]'d and [[CC]] texts it is not applicable to maintain the texts discrete of each other thus resulting in CC texts being subliminated into GFDL, which AFIK is a violation of both [[licenses]] | ||
::Probably true. But no one knows, because, it's too new. | |||
::Also, the GFDL as applied to a [[large public wiki]] is held by some to be almost equivalent to [[public domain]] since there is no way to make a case against [[copyright co-owner]]s, and no practical way to get permission from all involved parties to pursue a case of [[copyright infringement]]. There are many specific critiques of how stupidly [[Wikimedia]] has mismanaged this, go read it on the [[wikilegal]] list which should be called [[stupidsysops]] list. |