Jump to content

Talk:Wikinfo: Difference between revisions

534 bytes added ,  5 March 2004
no edit summary
(how does this multi-licensing work in practice?)
 
No edit summary
 
Line 2: Line 2:


:How does this work out in practice. I suppose that if an article consists of [[GFDL]]'d and [[CC]] texts it is not applicable to maintain the texts discrete of each other thus resulting in CC texts being subliminated into GFDL, which AFIK is a violation of both [[licenses]]
:How does this work out in practice. I suppose that if an article consists of [[GFDL]]'d and [[CC]] texts it is not applicable to maintain the texts discrete of each other thus resulting in CC texts being subliminated into GFDL, which AFIK is a violation of both [[licenses]]
::Probably true.  But no one knows, because, it's too new.
::Also, the GFDL as applied to a [[large public wiki]] is held by some to be almost equivalent to [[public domain]] since there is no way to make a case against [[copyright co-owner]]s, and no practical way to get permission from all involved parties to pursue a case of [[copyright infringement]].  There are many specific critiques of how stupidly [[Wikimedia]] has mismanaged this, go read it on the [[wikilegal]] list which should be called [[stupidsysops]] list.
Anonymous user
We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.