Worst practices: Difference between revisions
(well roared, 142.177) |
(stopping worst practices is more teleological than ontological) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Worst practices''', the opposite of [[best practices]], are ontologically [[factionally defined]] as | '''Worst practices''', the opposite of [[best practices]], are ontologically [[factionally defined]] as different groups think different things are "worst": | ||
*[[Greens]] probably think [[deforestation]] and other [[extinction]] are worst | *[[Greens]] probably think [[deforestation]] and other [[extinction]] are worst | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*[[Trolls]] probably think [[Wikimedia corruption]] and [[sysop vandalism]] are worst | *[[Trolls]] probably think [[Wikimedia corruption]] and [[sysop vandalism]] are worst | ||
Regardless of these | Regardless of these [[teleological]] priorities, rack up enough "worst" across many [[faction]]s, and you can expect a [[red light]] to flash as the [[Consumerium buying signal]]! | ||
Revision as of 18:15, 25 July 2004
Worst practices, the opposite of best practices, are ontologically factionally defined as different groups think different things are "worst":
- Greens probably think deforestation and other extinction are worst
- Pinks probably think child slavery and spreading disease are worst
- Reds probably think excessive profit and prison labour are worst
- Trolls probably think Wikimedia corruption and sysop vandalism are worst
Regardless of these teleological priorities, rack up enough "worst" across many factions, and you can expect a red light to flash as the Consumerium buying signal!