What we are supposed to be doing and in what order: Difference between revisions

m
and maintenance
(Since we have a total consensus (2 persons ;) on this, I'm dedicating a page to this)
 
m (and maintenance)
Line 4: Line 4:
#Get some wise people to lay down [[instructional capital]] that all parties can accept, that defines on [[what ground]]s [[each type of information]] is [[input]], [[audit]]ed, [[link]]ed, [[shared]], [[duplicated]], [[edit]]ed, [[contest]]ed, [[veto]]ed and [[remove]]d and by [[who]]m.
#Get some wise people to lay down [[instructional capital]] that all parties can accept, that defines on [[what ground]]s [[each type of information]] is [[input]], [[audit]]ed, [[link]]ed, [[shared]], [[duplicated]], [[edit]]ed, [[contest]]ed, [[veto]]ed and [[remove]]d and by [[who]]m.
#Develop software that allows us to maintain integrity of the [[instructional capital]],[[Current]] and [[Historical]] [[Data]] without being encumbered by the work and provide all parties with suitable [[UI]] for their role.  
#Develop software that allows us to maintain integrity of the [[instructional capital]],[[Current]] and [[Historical]] [[Data]] without being encumbered by the work and provide all parties with suitable [[UI]] for their role.  
#Acquire [[financial capital]] ([[funds]], [[cashflow]]) for routine operations and [[individual capital]] (talent) to aid deployment.
#Acquire [[financial capital]] ([[funds]], [[cashflow]]) for routine operations and [[individual capital]] (talent) to aid deployment and maintenance.
#retain [[social capital]] (trust, relationships, connections) of all [[faction]]s as we try to achieve [[consensus]] on standards above.  No [[faction]] can feel so excluded that they go off to "start their own".
#retain [[social capital]] (trust, relationships, connections) of all [[faction]]s as we try to achieve [[consensus]] on standards above.  No [[faction]] can feel so excluded that they go off to "start their own".
9,842

edits