Two-party system: Difference between revisions
(best place for this) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
As [[Trolls]] gain rights and force [[sysop power structure]] to adhere to some [[social contract]], a '''two-party system''' develops. Formal [[faction]]s in and out of these two parties jockey for control of the [[consensus]] and the [[dissensus]]. Eventually, a true [[multiple point of view]] system evolves. | As [[Trolls]] gain rights and force [[sysop power structure]] to adhere to some [[social contract]], a '''two-party system''' develops. Formal [[faction]]s in and out of these two parties jockey for control of the [[consensus]] and the [[dissensus]]. Eventually, a true [[multiple point of view]] system evolves. | ||
By this theory, [[Wikinfo]] is a more advanced [[Wikipedia]], which under this theory is quite early in its evolution. | |||
''See [[w:two-party system]] for historical examples of this in politics.'' | ''See [[w:two-party system]] for historical examples of this in politics.'' | ||
Revision as of 22:30, 3 March 2004
One theory is that neutral point of view is really a systemic bias (in large public wikis, an editorial bias). This is resisted by a New Troll point of view that refers to it as groupthink or just bogus or a product of individual biases.
As Trolls gain rights and force sysop power structure to adhere to some social contract, a two-party system develops. Formal factions in and out of these two parties jockey for control of the consensus and the dissensus. Eventually, a true multiple point of view system evolves.
By this theory, Wikinfo is a more advanced Wikipedia, which under this theory is quite early in its evolution.
See w:two-party system for historical examples of this in politics.