Talk:Unsubstantiated claims of Wikimedia corruption

Add topic
Revision as of 21:31, 18 June 2004 by Jukeboksi (talk | contribs) (not true, not true)

142, please provide specifics and references for these claims.

Doing so for new claims; However, since lies, libel and echo chamber fraud are freely spread on vile mailing lists run by Wikimedia without any such specifics or references, it might be abusive to require such documentation from their opponents; most specific references are in the sub-articles using the most infamous Wikimedia clowns as the universal bad example for how not to do wiki governance.
Is being blocked in China evidence of corruption? hm. Trolls would say no, but, sysop power structure would have to respect China's power structure and their pet sysops who are their friends in fascist power plays. - hail to the red faction!

The partially released results of the Wikimedia Board of Trustees "election" proves what trolls have always said: it is a front for the sysop power structure:

"The top 3 for contributing rep were:

Anthere 269 Eloquence 258 (Erik Moeller) Maveric149 163 ((Daniel Mayer)

The top 2 for for volunteer rep:

Angela 345 (Auntie Angela) Maveric149 159" (Daniel Mayer)


Moved from Wikimedia corruption

This is not true. Imran and Danny have decided to not release full results apparently because some candidates wished they not be released. This has been critisized in the #wikipedia IRC channel recently and a plan is proposed that all results of those candidates who agree to releasing their votecounts would be released and those withholding would just look silly.
  1. Jimbo no longer works for Bomis, thus he has no employees at Bomis
  2. Michael Davis never worked there
  3. Only Bomis employee on the board is Tim Shell
Return to "Unsubstantiated claims of Wikimedia corruption" page.