Search results

  • ...Moeller as a "backup trustee"] against all sanity and process, and [[Erik Moeller]] instantly answers "[http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2004
    2 KB (282 words) - 18:45, 28 June 2004
  • *[[Erik Moeller]] (12 links) - third worst villain, [[libel]] king
    570 bytes (75 words) - 21:51, 18 August 2004
  • '''[[MediaWiki developer]] payment''' has been proposed by [[Erik Moeller]][http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Developer_payment and resisted by some oth
    932 bytes (139 words) - 01:48, 26 July 2004
  • ...chamber]] lies. One such '''troll jihad''' declaration was against [[Erik Moeller]], who often attempts [[outing]], and has advocated [[developer vigilantiis : ROTFL. You are entertaining in a truly pathetic way, Craig.--Erik
    2 KB (388 words) - 19:26, 20 September 2004
  • ::::Lying little criminals like [[Erik Moeller]] and [[Tim Starling]] who hand out [[vandalbot]] code like party favours a
    2 KB (249 words) - 22:15, 18 June 2004
  • ...pedia]] was up, then, it might be plausible that someone other than [[Erik Moeller]] or [[Tim Starling]] (who had control over all such bots prior to that) la
    2 KB (378 words) - 19:41, 26 June 2004
  • ...ssion about [[Gus Kouwenhoven]], [[Craig Hubley]], [[Fred Bauder]], [[Erik Moeller]] and [[Abe Sokolov]] could easily be developed into a model of what are th
    2 KB (271 words) - 19:25, 9 September 2004
  • :[[Erik Moeller]] - truly incomprehensible number of incidents, probably the very worst [[e
    2 KB (359 words) - 21:26, 7 September 2004
  • - removal of parties who habitually engage in this behaviour, e.g. [[Erik Moeller]], [[Daniel Mayer]] from any position of responsiblity in Wikimedia, with p
    2 KB (373 words) - 20:47, 7 September 2004
  • ...histories, logs and deleted pages (notably those about people like [[Erik Moeller]]) to find the exact specific [[Wikipedia mailing list]] quotes that back u
    3 KB (438 words) - 16:58, 9 September 2004
  • ...mon [[usurper]] tactic, e.g. employed heavily by [[Auntie Angela]], [[Erik Moeller]], as a prelude to censorship. Important to realize:
    3 KB (442 words) - 19:17, 6 May 2004
  • ...tware imperialism]] and specifically the control of that project by [[Erik Moeller]] and [[Tim Starling]]). Other [[wiki code]] will almost certainly be requ
    4 KB (566 words) - 18:26, 7 September 2004
  • ...], just because two people hate you doesn't mean they are co-conspirators. Erik and I are quite different in most respects, however we share the ability (a ::What makes Tim Starling and Erik Moeller the same? amateur psychiatry, libel, God's Eye view, and assumption that [
    5 KB (877 words) - 12:49, 19 May 2010
  • ...or a developer to rig" it becomes possible only for these two individuals, Moeller and Starling, to rig the votes. ''See [[Disinfopedia]] entries on [http:// ...up. In the future this might be of benefit to his friend and ally [[Erik Moeller]] who is a strong opponent of [[English Wikipedia User Anthere]], who won t
    11 KB (1,936 words) - 13:40, 9 September 2004
  • ...letions were not discussed anywhere. "Eloquence" (self-declared as [[Erik Moeller]]) is a [[sysop vandalism|sysop vandal]]: ...k was being censored at the time. Likewise this next one on WIPE. [[Erik Moeller]] (Eloquence) simply took the opportunity to destroy work that was offensiv
    14 KB (2,276 words) - 18:10, 6 September 2004
  • Squabbling among [[M.R.M. Parrot]], [[Tim Starling]], [[Erik Moeller]], and other highly ideological developers who seem to believe in [[develop
    6 KB (912 words) - 18:29, 7 September 2004
  • ...es Wales]], [[Howard Rheingold]], [[Sunir Shah]], [[Daniel Mayer]], [[Erik Moeller]], [[Tim Starling]], [[Angela Beesley]] or any other [[virtual community]]
    3 KB (428 words) - 20:45, 10 September 2016
  • ...instated [[troll text]] would be themselves subject to [[IP block]]s. But Moeller remains a sysop so this must be considered "policy" on your part. ...finite) (contribs) (trolling / libel against Wikimedia foundation); ..."; Moeller is equating what he calls "[[trolling]]" with [[libel]] which is a legal th
    18 KB (2,843 words) - 14:25, 29 September 2004
  • Question: If [[James Wales]], [[Daniel Mayer]], [[Tim Starling]], [[Erik Moeller]] were all kicked out, would the rest of the project stabilize and solve it
    8 KB (1,265 words) - 10:47, 26 September 2004
  • ::Recently, on [[m:|Meta-Wikipedia]], Users [[Erik Moeller]] and [[Auntie Angela|Angela Beesley]] agreed that "only the [[community po ::Moeller even advocated openly on the [[Wikipedia IRC channel]] that Wikimedia shoul
    10 KB (1,627 words) - 07:36, 13 July 2010
View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)